Yedaa hai kya Chavan !! - Page 27

I know why many of us felt NB's reaction was thanda. He acted well especially as he understood what JM was saying.

If they don't show him thinking about SAI too, his reactions will always be thanda, because it is so irrational. His anger is completely logical.

But him not having any FB of Sai...renders him harsh and we get disengaged. That's the mistake the writers are making throughout this track.

Yes he can be angry with Sai for hiding the fact that she is alive. But him not having a single line grateful that she's alive, makes us disconnect with him immediately.

Originally posted by: Sherry24

It is Gold! Pure Gold.

The math scene was so good. The way JM explained using the rings.

Gold is a symbol of royalty, purity. He placed the two rings on the ground representing Savi and Sai respectively. In a way giving the message that they are pure and valuable as gold.

JM asked everything that was logical and yet V ignored so far. But the point to be noted was V only registered the logics related to Savi. At this point he is too occupied with the thought that Savi is his daughter, The happiness that his dream came true. Yes, he subconsciously wished that Savi should be his daughter. So his guilt and realisation of his mistakes are limited to Savi. "Bewde ne jo bhi Yede ko Savi ke baare mein bola woh dimag mein aise chap gaya!"

He is beating himself for not reading the signs, for not ever thinking that Savi could be his daughter.

Now note this dialogue "Maine kaise nahi socha ki Savi meri beti hai".

No where does he think about how he doubted that Sai would cheat or move away from him. He never said "maine kaise nahi socha is Sai kabhi kisi aur se pyaar nahi kar sakti"

Very clearly he is keeping Sai and Savi separate. It's weird because not thinking about Savi being his daughter, clearly indicates that he doubted Sai to have moved on. They are connected.

When he is recalling the scenes with Savi and questioning himself, he has no images of Sai's question. Sai saying that she gave birth to Savi, She asked him what he means by who is Sai's father, Sai saying that Savi is only her child, why she slapped him nothing.

JM was very clear on Sai. But V did not reflect on any of those questions or facts. Which means there is no introspection happening and he will play victim and Sai will be his culprit. And as a father, the culprit of his daughter.

Suddenly Savi is "Meri Bacchi" not "Humari bacchi".

He is asking valid questions, "Sai ne mujhe sach kyon nahi bataya", but refuses to believe that he knows the answers. As they put him on the spot instead of Sai. Yes, Sai did wrong to keep Savi away from her father, but he was the root cause. At every point, when she could have revealed he said or did things that made her retreat. Right from where he asked her "Kiski beti hai Savi" to Sai's character assassination. I still believe after that he does not deserve to be raising a girl child.

Agree with you 1000% Sherry.

JM said its because of his SHAQ and EGO. Sai has said she gave birth to Savi, but still he said to JM Sai could never become a mother, so how could Savi be his beti? The maths class JM gave was too basic for an IPS officer to not figure out himself. He himself said Savi is the name they decided on their daughter yet he questioned who is Savi's father. In todays episode too he said he never questioned or had shaq on Sai but that is exactly why he didnt even think Savi could be his. Its his ego that is refusing to admit he was wrong too.

JM also said Sai had only loved him and Savi is Sai's sacha pyar ki nishani. Sai too said the same, Savi is her pyar ki nishani, not their symbol of love. Sai gave birth and raised her symbol of love alone. Reminded me of the tree Savi planted and the ring Sai buried. The tree will answer when Savi's baba will come and the ring is symbol of V's love towards Sai. It has to have some connection.

Originally posted by: purplegirl7

Agree with you 1000% Sherry.

JM said its because of his SHAQ and EGO. Sai has said she gave birth to Savi, but still he said to JM Sai could never become a mother, so how could Savi be his beti? The maths class JM gave was too basic for an IPS officer to not figure out himself. He himself said Savi is the name they decided on their daughter yet he questioned who is Savi's father. In todays episode too he said he never questioned or had shaq on Sai but that is exactly why he didnt even think Savi could be his. Its his ego that is refusing to admit he was wrong too.

JM also said Sai had only loved him and Savi is Sai's sacha pyar ki nishani. Sai too said the same, Savi is her pyar ki nishani, not their symbol of love. Sai gave birth and raised her symbol of love alone. Reminded me of the tree Savi planted and the ring Sai buried. The tree will answer when Savi's baba will come and the ring is symbol of V's love towards Sai. It has to have some connection.

So true. For her now it is was all her love. She loved him like she never lived anyone. But he had someone else who mattered more. So it became “her” love.

The ring dug deep has to have a purpose. It popped up when Sai was leaving. Her love still trying to make her shake her resolve. So dug it back again, burying her love. And that is what is happening now. If there was any remainder V has ensured she sedates it. He will have to bring it back now by proving it was not just “her” but “his” as well, to make it “theirs”. For now it all be about “me” and “I”

Originally posted by: Sherry24

So true. For her now it is was all her love. She loved him like she never lived anyone. But he had someone else who mattered more. So it became “her” love.

The ring dug deep has to have a purpose. It popped up when Sai was leaving. Her love still trying to make her shake her resolve. So dug it back again, burying her love. And that is what is happening now. If there was any remainder V has ensured she sedates it. He will have to bring it back now by proving it was not just “her” but “his” as well, to make it “theirs”. For now it all be about “me” and “I”

The part that I hate is there is zero introspection donne by any of them, mainly V. Atleast S feels regretful and they show that onscreen, but with other chars esp V, they show situations and dialogues where everyonen has selective hearing or amnnesia, carefully to make sure that no logical introspection happens. I dunnno why this move to compleltely ignore Sais side of justification or trauma, while making only S remember. There were so many parallels, where any char could have had FB of what happened pre leap, they remove logical dialogues from S too, where seh can easily beat any stupid logic V comes up with. I would say writing such one tone and dubious dialogues is hard work compared to showing what is logical.

Thats why i can not connect with V pain cos of zero self awarenness and the belief that he and his family are the only victims, are the onnly people who suffered and are bunch of moral citizens, WHY cos they adopted vinu. If the child wasnt already named vinu, them naming vinayak is also a grave injustice to the adopted kid.

Why is everyone in CN nowas bunnch of robots, with no thoughts of their own except to let pakrat procreate, even if they see they arent happy. like what is wrong in showing side tracks, How is embroyo chor not one percent guilty or recollecting the shitty thing she did, isnt what S did more painful , letting them live happily despite havinng claim to everything P has?

why is her connfession drunk even was so appealing to these oldies, when if ghey ever loved samfat even one percentt, they should feel guilty for ruining his life, and think of the 100 times she lied. I know its like in the past, just saying this cos thats why as a viewer even if P is mother terasa, not able to relate cos no regret, and no shame.

Originally posted by: gingergarlic

The part that I hate is there is zero introspection donne by any of them, mainly V. Atleast S feels regretful and they show that onscreen, but with other chars esp V, they show situations and dialogues where everyonen has selective hearing or amnnesia, carefully to make sure that no logical introspection happens. I dunnno why this move to compleltely ignore Sais side of justification or trauma, while making only S remember. There were so many parallels, where any char could have had FB of what happened pre leap, they remove logical dialogues from S too, where seh can easily beat any stupid logic V comes up with. I would say writing such one tone and dubious dialogues is hard work compared to showing what is logical.

Thats why i can not connect with V pain cos of zero self awarenness and the belief that he and his family are the only victims, are the onnly people who suffered and are bunch of moral citizens, WHY cos they adopted vinu. If the child wasnt already named vinu, them naming vinayak is also a grave injustice to the adopted kid.

Why is everyone in CN nowas bunnch of robots, with no thoughts of their own except to let pakrat procreate, even if they see they arent happy. like what is wrong in showing side tracks, How is embroyo chor not one percent guilty or recollecting the shitty thing she did, isnt what S did more painful , letting them live happily despite havinng claim to everything P has?

why is her connfession drunk even was so appealing to these oldies, when if ghey ever loved samfat even one percentt, they should feel guilty for ruining his life, and think of the 100 times she lied. I know its like in the past, just saying this cos thats why as a viewer even if P is mother terasa, not able to relate cos no regret, and no shame.

That is the reason why the anger and frustration here is manifold.

We don't have clarity on the past, what conspired, why it is what it is. They are still trying to revel on suspense, but now it has started to get to people.

There is definitely more to it, that we can see and read. But they need to start dropping some hints. Or this toxicity will keep going up the ladder

Originally posted by: Sherry24

That is the reason why the anger and frustration here is manifold.

We don't have clarity on the past, what conspired, why it is what it is. They are still trying to revel on suspense, but now it has started to get to people.

There is definitely more to it, that we can see and read. But they need to start dropping some hints. Or this toxicity will keep going up the ladder

It’s not about suspense.

if they say P was regretful and stood outside CN niwas for two months to beg for forgiveness, suffered from public humiliation etc make us sympathise with her, when they don’t show them recolkect their deeds, even if the suspense is broken.
Maybe I am seeing it as black and white. If they hold Sai responsible for accidents, what P did was intentional, if they can’t even be happy for S being alive and be so so cruel, how have they easily not hold a grudge don’t even have to hold a grudge against P but they should talk about her deeds. Plus they didn’t hold even one percent disgust preleap when she was bailed out immediately, will the same people it’s unlikely they would hold P responsible, they would be like she apologised and begged her to stay so she is forgiven, all generosity for forgiveness is for P by every member of the Chavan family.

No point discussing this I know but it’s really stupid when they could have done exact same thing keeping them unnarried but created MU, or S had every right to be pissed to see P in the house after all these years.