Situation is not correct, None is 100% correct here and none is 100% wrong
I felt bad for Sai when her son was taken away from her and didn't like what Virat did, I have the same stand here, Sai took away Vinayak from him with a mindset that her Aaba raised her alone so she'll raise her son alone but she is forgetting that her Aaba raising her alone was his compulsion, he didn't wrong anyone for it
Sai took away Virat's son from him, I see their reasons, I saw Virat's reason that Pakhi is on the verge of suicide and if this child can make her happy then we can give him to her for a few days and I understand Sai's reasons for leaving today
But, I can't justify either because both are wrong for taking a decision like this, Vinayak has a father, why should he grow up like a fatherless child and why Sai has the right to take decision if she is not going to divorce Virat?
I'd understand this if they were divorcing each other and custody was given to Sai
Your pain, anger everything is justified but taking such decision for Vinayak and Virat is not justified
People connect with a mother's pain more that's why everyone felt bad for Sai when her son was taken away from her but a father is a parent too, he has love and rights too
Vinu was taken away from sai for no reason. If virat did his work dutifully than he will be able to know the truth that why Geeta and Sai didn't came that day and how pakhi became surrogate.
but he didn't investigate anything and just ignored sai's complain.It's police duty to capture attackers but he didn't did it.
If attackers not from pakhi than also it was his duty.
Virat said today sai got married davkit but he didn't say that his family has given her wrong medicine for so long and give devi's daughter to orphanage. Sai reunited his sis with her family.
It is so easy for virat to said that sai didn't consider Chavans her family he always do that.Sai always opposed his family(sorry just kaku mandli) when they are wrong but virat doesn't see that.
For his family and so called promises he can break laws but he doesn't see wrong in it because for him family comes first.If that's the case than why give him the dialoges on duty and farz. Instead he should say duty and farz came first when family is not involve else family is first priority.
Now also virat can easily say that we will bail out pakhi but she will stay with her mother and father.
in that way both Sai and his family get satisfied but he was adamant to bring pakhi home.
For him pakhi a criminal(who tried to harm sai ,snatched her child) is his family who can't stay at her own mother's house.
it's not at her mother's house she is going to have any problem because she is also one and only child of theirs but for virat and Kaku family's crime didn't matter.
Virat told sai never accepted his family but its vise versa. Kaku accepted sai for some days because of virat's lies that sai will give up her carrier. After that Kaku goes to her usual self to taunting but virat didn't see that.
In one or two episode they can't make both responsible for separation.
Yes,Sai has no right to separate a son from his father but virat had a choice and he choose opposite. he didn't give any choice to sai when snatching vinu from her so we can't compare both situations.
This situation only show that Chavans never considered sai their own. They never cared for her.
And yes,it will be great if they divorce each other but maybe sai was going to file divorce after coming back from gad chiroli. She can't stay in gad chiroli for ever because she have a job in nagpur and it's not she runaway from CN so she have to stay away from nagpur. Sai left home in daylight and front of everyone so she doesn't have to leave her job and hide somewhere so she was definitely going to come back nagpur after sometime and live separate at her house maybe with Usha maushi.
1.7k