Originally posted by: 404_NotFound
Samrat Pakhi decided to marry even before Virat came to attend their marriage. He didn’t force anyone at gun point to marry . Pakhi married for her selfish reason and Samrat ignored all the red flags in their relationship before marriage. Why is it Virat responsibility to tell the truth when his brother is least interested in hearing his side . His brother is ready to talk to his wife so let her talk about her real feelings. His brother has blamed Virat alone and is ready to give his wife a chance to move on . Before declaring that he should have understood what she wants . High time the couple take some responsibility in life
Samrat Pakhi took wedding vows so it’s on them to respect it and understand each other . Virat is not responsible for them .
Virat and samrat are brothers and who have had a strong friendship since childhood. He did not force anybody at gun point, but he did influence both pakhi and samrat's decisions by withholding truth from samrat whilst convincing pakhi to marry samrat. He is not responsible for pakhi;s life as she is nothing to him, but he is responsible for his brother from whom he hides the truth and who he has a duty to be honest with.
How long did samrat know pakhi before he married her to know that there was someone else in her life all by himself? Not much, but even then he had asked her on one occasion as he sensed something off with her mood but she completely denied so anybody in his place would have took her word for it. But virat had gotten to know the truth about pakhi being samrat's to-be wife on their haldi day, and he had time to tell samrat the truth between haldi and the wedding day, but he didn't. Instead he found time to convince pakhi to be part of his sacrifice for his brother.
Even then I can give virat the benefit of the doubt that he did not want to hurt his brother by going to him and telling him that the girl who he is about to marry loves his brother etc, so okay it is fine if the first time around he did not tell samrat before wedding about pakhi-virat, but bare minimum he should not have convinced pakhi either to marry samrat with that promise. He could have just said to pakhi that he cannot tell his family about her and him and neither can he marry her at the cost of his brother's and family's feelings, so whatever decision she wants to take, she can take knowing he will not marry her, regardless of whether she chooses to marry his brother or not. So even if he chose to not tell samrat the truth, he should have left pakhi to make her own decision about what she wants to do now that he refuses to marry her to break his brother's heart.
But given that he did influence her decision, and he has seen the consequences of that mistake, it is his responsibility now as a brother that he tells samrat that pakhi still is not ready to accept samrat as husband and still loves virat so that his brother does not ruin his life by making a wrong decision without knowing all the facts.
Pakhi cannot put all the onus of the decisions she took on virat, but samrat does have a right to blame virat as samrat and virat are brothers and virat should not be hiding the truth from him at least now that samrat is deciding to divorce pakhi, but yet again virat is trying to influence pakhi-samrat's situation by convincing pakhi to stay with samrat and again we all know predictably virat will still not tell samrat that pakhi's full intentions are only to divorce samrat and get with virat.