I am sure it’s an unpopular opinion but I feel Virat did the right thing by not clarifying to Sai about his meeting with Pakhi . Let’s assume Virat would have clarified , would Sai believe him or would she assume what she thinks is right based on the conversation Sairat had during their marriage . She would go with the latter . Based on the past behavior of Sai , no matter what Virat says she wouldn’t believe he has moved on from Pakhi .
Despite Virat clarifying about the below things , Sai still accused him of being a two timer and being unhappy that his brother has returned back . What would be different this time if Virat had shared the real purpose of the meet . He did say that he wants Pakhi to move on with Samrat yet Sai assumed differently while talking to Shivani . He did the right thing by clarifying infront of family and not giving anyone a chance to share their twisted version .
1. Virat clarified that he is no longer committed to anyone
2. Virat has time and again said he likes her a lot
3. Virat expressed his desire for a real marriage
4. Virat clarified he doesn’t need to take Pakhi’s permission while going on a mission
5. Virat clarified he doesn’t give two hoots about Pakhi when Sai bought Pakhi during anniversary trip
6. During hospital times , he choose his wife over his so called lover
7. He supported Sai over Pakhi blindly during birthday track
6. His actions where he has shown Pakhi means nothing to him .
Despite all the above , he is nothing but a two timer in Sai’s eyes . After this incident, he will be still be a two timer so no big difference.