Right thing - Page 4

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

He told pakhi to move on with samrat but pakhi refused for it. Had he left the matter when she said no. Then it would have called advice.

But he again & again told her to accept samrat. Isn't it forcing?

What pakhi or samrat does is secondary. Why can't he tell whole truth infront of family & let samrat decide if he still wants to give pakhi a chance or not. How will he decide on samrat behalf. Samrat still loving pakhi is not excuse. If he feels samrat is ready to accept pakhi whatever she does then why can't he tell the truth with honesty & leave the decision upto samrat. No one saw pakhi extreme obsession for virat except virat himself. If u r so honest then tell full truth instead of half baked information. As simple as that.

Pakhi is a grown woman. She can make her own decisions. Virat is not responsible for her actions. What he is responsible for, though, is being honest with his brother. Whatever his reasons were, him hiding the truth from samrat is what got him into this entire mess to begin with. Virat owes it to samrat, whom he claims is the second half to his soul, to tell him what a psychotic and delusional woman he is married to. What happened at the cafe cannot be brushed under the rug. Samrat deserves to know. After that, if he chooses to stay with Pakhi, he can dig his own grave. But, I just don’t understand how Virat can keep this from him….just my POV

Originally posted by: tptwi

Pakhi is a grown woman. She can make her own decisions. Virat is not responsible for her actions. What he is responsible for, though, is being honest with his brother. Whatever his reasons were, him hiding the truth from samrat is what got him into this entire mess to begin with. Virat owes it to samrat, whom he claims is the second half to his soul, to tell him what a psychotic and delusional woman he is married to. What happened at the cafe cannot be brushed under the rug. Samrat deserves to know. After that, if he chooses to stay with Pakhi, he can dig his own grave. But, I just don’t understand how Virat can keep this from him….just my POV

I would have preferred he said it once, about giving a chance to Samrat and then when she mentioned divorce, he should have said if you want a divorce go on, its for you two to decide but there is no future for us.. Pooja my point here is knowing Pakhi he should stop asking her anything , stop advising her, because of the way she takes his words.... She was fine with him lying about his love for her.. It wont take a brilliant mind to understand that she is obsessed with him and he needs to stop advising her... So I would have preferred if he said you can go on your separate ways if "you" want, but there is no us even in that case.. I would not like him calling her his friend or giving her advice henceforth. Because of the way she is least bothered about his brother, his abusive towards his wife, the way she treats his family and most importantly him..Baki story wise there is not point of this meeting, everyone is stuck at their same assumptions, Pakhi still going on to tell Sai, how she is "assuming" stuff as usual.. They could have avoided this, it was not needed just to stretch the whole misunderstanding thing.. and there was no need to stretch the whole "cafe" scene as well.. But then I am not sure what is in Vanku's mind..

Originally posted by: asmi_joya

I would have preferred he said it once, about giving a chance to Samrat and then when she mentioned divorce, he should have said if you want a divorce go on, its for you two to decide but there is no future for us.. Pooja my point here is knowing Pakhi he should stop asking her anything , stop advising her, because of the way she takes his words.... She was fine with him lying about his love for her.. It wont take a brilliant mind to understand that she is obsessed with him and he needs to stop advising her... So I would have preferred if he said you can go on your separate ways if "you" want, but there is no us even in that case.. I would not like him calling her his friend or giving her advice henceforth. Because of the way she is least bothered about his brother, his abusive towards his wife, the way she treats his family and most importantly him..Baki story wise there is not point of this meeting, everyone is stuck at their same assumptions, Pakhi still going on to tell Sai, how she is "assuming" stuff as usual.. They could have avoided this, it was not needed just to stretch the whole misunderstanding thing.. and there was no need to stretch the whole "cafe" scene as well.. But then I am not sure what is in Vanku's mind..

All I was saying is that if and when Pakhi decides to stay with samrat, that will be on her. Not Virat. Just like marrying samrat was on her. She is making her own decisions, and she will have to live with the consequences. In terms of what we would prefer to see onscreen, that is a separate conversation. Of course the makers are stretching this beyond what is necessary and of course vankar is living in his own delusions of what he wants to show….but what’s new? 🤣

Originally posted by: tptwi

All I was saying is that if and when Pakhi decides to stay with samrat, that will be on her. Not Virat. Just like marrying samrat was on her. She is making her own decisions, and she will have to live with the consequences. In terms of what we would prefer to see onscreen, that is a separate conversation. Of course the makers are stretching this beyond what is necessary and of course vankar is living in his own delusions of what he wants to show….but what’s new? 🤣

That is true, its not Virat's calling..From here on its not..But the delusional person she is , she would say Virat tumne bola tha toh maine mauka diya aur mujhe usse pyaar nahi hua...sirf tumhare kehne par maine mauka diya, sirf tumhare kehne par..Or even if they have marital issues, she will come back running to him to blame him..She is a woman who has zero sense of self analysation.. So I want Virat to steer clear..He need not tell her anything, need not call her a friend, need not give her advice, need not be a nice person to help her stop crying..He has done enough..Good hearted people also need to take a back seat.. at times..

Hopefully Virat will make it clear when he calls for a family meeting that he is not part of the equation.

Originally posted by: Kumuda-123

Virat is not responsible for samrakhi marriage. But he can force pakhi to move on with samrat even after knowing her real desire.CUTE😍.

Cute hai na mein isse cute cheez share karte sai gave up her wifely rights on virat so that pakhi ka sapna poora ho sake sai very well know pakhi's intension never had guts to tell virat this truth but kept on enjoying his attention double cute

Sai dont have any right to question virat apni cuteness mein bhul gayi .

Originally posted by: 404_NotFound

I am sure it’s an unpopular opinion but I feel Virat did the right thing by not clarifying to Sai about his meeting with Pakhi . Let’s assume Virat would have clarified , would Sai believe him or would she assume what she thinks is right based on the conversation Sairat had during their marriage . She would go with the latter . Based on the past behavior of Sai , no matter what Virat says she wouldn’t believe he has moved on from Pakhi .

Despite Virat clarifying about the below things , Sai still accused him of being a two timer and being unhappy that his brother has returned back . What would be different this time if Virat had shared the real purpose of the meet . He did say that he wants Pakhi to move on with Samrat yet Sai assumed differently while talking to Shivani . He did the right thing by clarifying infront of family and not giving anyone a chance to share their twisted version .

1. Virat clarified that he is no longer committed to anyone

2. Virat has time and again said he likes her a lot

3. Virat expressed his desire for a real marriage

4. Virat clarified he doesn’t need to take Pakhi’s permission while going on a mission

5. Virat clarified he doesn’t give two hoots about Pakhi when Sai bought Pakhi during anniversary trip

6. During hospital times , he choose his wife over his so called lover

7. He supported Sai over Pakhi blindly during birthday track

6. His actions where he has shown Pakhi means nothing to him .

Despite all the above , he is nothing but a two timer in Sai’s eyes . After this incident, he will be still be a two timer so no big difference.

Sai was very much annoying in her Mahabaleshwar trip with Virat. She behaved very badly when Virat gave her the surprise.

All girls should get a husband like virat. After all he is perfect gentleman, except when he becomes angry, who keeps his wife guessing whether he is committed to her or his ex and dare she question him to clarify his stand, he won’t hesitate to gaslight her in perfect gentlemanly manner.

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

Cute hai na mein isse cute cheez share karte sai gave up her wifely rights on virat so that pakhi ka sapna poora ho sake sai very well know pakhi's intension never had guts to tell virat this truth but kept on enjoying his attention double cute

Sai dont have any right to question virat apni cuteness mein bhul gayi .

Sai don't have any right to question Virat if she harps on this being a deal marriage. She says its a deal marriage and still stands by it so has no rights either to relinquish. She has no rights to question even if he pursues a relationship outside if they have no commitment towards each other. But the same Virat character assasinated and s**ut shamed her for being with Ajinkya. The rule was already broken by him in his cuteness and over possessiveness. If a rule exits for married couple be in deal or no deal the rules should be same for both men and woman. A mans insecurity cant get a free pass just because he is a man. If he can question so can she. Except that her questioning actually has abse because Virat made her privy to his commitment status. The same Virat hid Pakhis intentions from Sai and his family. I see none better than other. Both Virat and Sai had no right to question each other except that Virat crossed his limits, manhandled and beaten up a teenager and caused an accident

If Sai has no right to "question"Virat because its a deal marriage then Virat has no right to question her either.

If Sai harps on the fact that marriage is deal then Virat also keeps harping on being a "guardian" and zimmedari.

Sai is an adult. Virat is too. Ideally they both owe each other no explanation about anything pertaining to their respective lives. But life does not work that way when 2 people are living together.

Marriage whether deal or not demands that the 2 people in that bond are honest with each other.

If Virat expects Sai to keep him in the loop about her life and her decisions, if he is affected by her then he should see that its the same for her too. She wants to know everything about him too, she wants to be in the loop too, even when she says she doesn't care because its obvious that she does. Because she would not be raising the topic if she didnt care. All of us do this in our life- where we are super affected by something but find it difficult to admit how much it affects us for many reasons.

Virat has not been 100% honest with Sai about pp despite knowing how much it affects her. She has raised the issue of pp enough times that he knows it immensely affects her. Yet he has told her only part of his story. He knows that Sai believes that he still loves pp but merely holds himself back for the sake of maryaada and honoring his marriage with Sai n Samrats marriage with pp. But his heart belongs to pp. This belief of Sai's is not some figment of imagination. It is based on what she sees. When Virat is emotional, guilty, or being righteous he has sometimes favored Sai over pp but he has also in favored pp over Sai in his words or actions by being sympathetic to pp, going out of the way to console her or allowing her to interfere in his marriage with Sai, allowing her to taunt/rebuke Sai as he watched silently.

Additionally virat has hid the truth about pp's intentions. His defense of pp time and again despite how inappropriate the woman is- has led to Sai feeling like he is lying and compromising merely for sake of social decorum n intangible maryaadas.

Sai said he was still on two boats - that is true. Sanrat said so too.

Sai did not say that he is a two timer or cheat. She is clear that Virat has not slept with pp or crossed any lines but to Sai- virat being emotionally invested in another woman, having had feelings for her as a "lover" are not things that she can look past or forget too easily.