Sai returning to Virat - Page 5

Originally posted by: Bhavisweet03

Yeah now where is his maturity gone?

tel lene 🤣

Originally posted by: rithika2015

Even i was expecting her to throw money on his face. I wud hav enjoyed it. Atleast for that catchinh hand throwing money on his face wud hav balanced a little atleast in actions. Bt sai was quiet gud today.

She was trying less and less to fight bt pp kept on instigating her.

Nah, this was like a slap without slapping. Looked like she respects money. In the other episode too, they showed how she felt bad that his ticket money got wasted.

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

I beg ur Pardon yes totally agree virat is wrong today & don't support but this episode can not be compared to Draupadi cheerharan .

When I say Draupadi ka cheerharan, I am not saying anyone tried to disrobe Sai like dushasan did with Draupadi instead I am saying the episode invoked the same emotions when I saw the cheerharan episode. A woman's self respect was brutally crushed by man to show his superiority just because she is different from the women he knows.

Originally posted by: Bhavisweet03

Yeah now where is his maturity gone?

Sai is a branded immatured girl 😂😂

Maturity se bhi samjhautha (T&C apply)

He acts matured

1. as and when he wants? Or

2. Without his own knowledge? Or

3. When Sai or Aai are not in picture? Or

4. When Sai or Aai are in picture but when he is not angry or upset with Sai 🙌🙌

Originally posted by: laksh

I know that happens in point 5 or mebbe even in 6 I guess. Though I don't know the details, he doesn't share details about Shruti (may be even official) and expect them to understand. Also I guess Shruthi also plays a role in it which creates misunderstanding amongst them.

Will comment on Sai when I actually get to know what happened. For me, whoever is at fault, is wrong, doesn't matter who it is.

When it comes to the question of character or infedility, things that would help a couple are trust and understanding. If it waivers and if they want to save their relationship they will have to resort to honesty, transparency and clarity.

He expects her to understand when it came to Shruthi but easily accusses her when he finds her with a guy at coffee shop? Pulkit joins a little late and he then realises they 3 had come together.

I understand it is his duty that stooped him from revealing details about Shruti to her, but if he expects that she understands them being spot at Hotel by Mohit, how can he accuse her to have just seen her with a guy at a coffee shop?

He then takes care of Pakhi, jus imagine if there was a role reversal, he wouldn't uncomfortable her helping her ex?

That takes me to the point when he raises objection for her to treat Jagtap.

His duty is duty but not hers?

It clearly only indicates double standards. If it is not, then it only means both are madly in love with each other and are extremely possessive. So they need to respect each other's feelings and act in such a way that the other doesn't get hurt (be it Sai or Virat).

Waise yeh un logon ki nahi, audience ki pariksha hai 😂😂🤭

If they bring such tracks where they are going to keep questioning each other's character, I don't think I will be interested to watch. I will get to know my tolerance level when the show reaches that point.

I know that how this serial works

Sai ka kutta Tommy

Virat ka kutta kutta

In all versions ML was wrong in domestic violence 100 % but he not wrong always in other cases.

Originally posted by: Fruitcustard_9

I know that how this serial works

Sai ka kutta Tommy

Virat ka kutta kutta

In all versions ML was wrong in domestic violence 100 % but he not wrong always in other cases.

Mere liye donon hi ek hai

Gender doesn't speak for me, only their actions counts for me.

Can you deny the fact that when he gets possessive he gets unreasonable? Can you deny the fact that when it comes to Sai interacting with the other gender, his expectations doesn't match with his own actions?

He couldn't hold himself from checking who Aniket is. His exact words hai kya cheez, aisa kya hai usmein.

I understood what he felt because he likes her, wants that attention from her and he never got to know that she likes him.

Sai never got impressed with him or never gave him the attention that he would have liked whereas Pakhi was smitten by him. He actually got intrigued by her.

But what he needs to understand is that she can also feel possessive, feel bad or jealous.

He did tell her about his past and it was him who laid out T&C but when he expects attention from her as a wife, start to look at this marriage as a real one, wants to make it a real one, wants her to stop bringing Pakhi in between, wants her to stop using the word deal then he is supposed to make her feel these.

Him letting Pakhi barge into their room as if she owns it or him acting a silent spectator in his own room when Pakhi demeans Sai and also ridicules his marriage and ridicules Sai as a wife, let her belittle her only can give wrong ideas to Sai. He is only ascertaining that he cannot be her husband and he can't give place to anyone other than Pakhi.

I tried to reason his thanda response to Pakhi's behavior while cancelling the trip to him wanting to leave, him wanting to reach the airport on time and not blowing up at that moment. Things would get worse if he has shouted at Pakhi, also he has no rights on Pakhi to shout at her.

But he would have turned the whole mansion upside down if Sai had done that. He has done that a couple of times without being fully aware of what the problem was. He is clouded by a few thoughts and then all his subsequent actions are a result of it.

Has it got to do with the fact that Sai is young, she is his responsibility so he thinks shouting at her means correcting her, teaching her, has liberty on her because she is his spouse? No spouse should take the other for granted, I would have been unhappy with Sai too if she did or does that to Virat.

Originally posted by: laksh

Mere liye donon hi ek hai

Gender doesn't speak for me, only their actions counts for me.

Can you deny the fact that when he gets possessive he gets unreasonable? Can you deny the fact that when it comes to Sai interacting with the other gender, his expectations doesn't match with his own actions?

He couldn't hold himself from checking who Aniket is. His exact words hai kya cheez, aisa kya hai usmein.

I understood what he felt because he likes her, wants that attention from her and he never got to know that she likes him.

Sai never got impressed with him or never gave him the attention that he would have liked whereas Pakhi was smitten by him. He actually got intrigued by her.

But what he needs to understand is that she can also feel possessive, feel bad or jealous.

He did tell her about his past and it was him who laid out T&C but when he expects attention from her as a wife, start to look at this marriage as a real one, wants to make it a real one, wants her to stop bringing Pakhi in between, wants her to stop using the word deal then he is supposed to make her feel these.

Him letting Pakhi barge into their room as if she owns it or him acting a silent spectator in his own room when Pakhi demeans Sai and also ridicules his marriage and ridicules Sai as a wife, let her belittle her only can give wrong ideas to Sai. He is only ascertaining that he cannot be her husband and he can't give place to anyone other than Pakhi.

I tried to reason his thanda response to Pakhi's behavior while cancelling the trip to him wanting to leave, him wanting to reach the airport on time and not blowing up at that moment. Things would get worse if he has shouted at Pakhi, also he has no rights on Pakhi to shout at her.

But he would have turned the whole mansion upside down if Sai had done that. He has done that a couple of times without being fully aware of what the problem was. He is clouded by a few thoughts and then all his subsequent actions are a result of it.

Has it got to do with the fact that Sai is young, she is his responsibility so he thinks shouting at her means correcting her, teaching her, has liberty on her because she is his spouse? No spouse should take the other for granted, I would have been unhappy with Sai too if she did or does that to Virat.

Do u really think sai is not impressed by him or possessive for him ? She had been possessive of virat a way before marriage , she was always taunted him of pakhi , see how she reacted when in candy floss episode when she was not getting virat's attention as she thought he left police station by obeying pakhi . She was sad & jealous when she assumed virat don't want to take her to ladakh , usne pucha bhi tha aap mujhe le jaayenge in d car

Trip wala kaand vo kyu itna kheech rahi oh she very well know virat was not wrong taking her along & she admired virat during that track , .

She don't want to share virat's shadow also with pakhi ( she completely right & I support her )

Aniket leaves in hostel , pakhi leaves in same house . To sai kaha jaye usse check karne ke liye uske kamre mein

Let me remind u not only virat but sai 2 was attracted to virat from starting .

Virat zimmedari ka rant karta hai isiliye sai openly show nhi karti .

Originally posted by: deepzz

When I say Draupadi ka cheerharan, I am not saying anyone tried to disrobe Sai like dushasan did with Draupadi instead I am saying the episode invoked the same emotions when I saw the cheerharan episode. A woman's self respect was brutally crushed by man to show his superiority just because she is different from the women he knows.

@bold wow ...you have portrayed it so well.

Originally posted by: deepzz

When I say Draupadi ka cheerharan, I am not saying anyone tried to disrobe Sai like dushasan did with Draupadi instead I am saying the episode invoked the same emotions when I saw the cheerharan episode. A woman's self respect was brutally crushed by man to show his superiority just because she is different from the women he knows.

Originally posted by: laksh

Whenever they get back together 😂😂, they run short of miya biwi scenes and banters

Whatever Sairat scenes we get to watch until Shruti's track, download them, will be of help later 😂

I think that the makers think that once a couple gets united, people start to lose interest in them and in their romance. I think it is due to lack of creativity that they are not able to show something interesting (positive) which will make the audience glued to the couple. So what they do is, get them separated, make the audience crave for scenes of this couple and then get them together, then even if they add the same romantic scene, audience will watch without any complaints or without feeling bored 😂😂😂.

and our creative team, will show all their creativity on Sairat 😉 separation tracks 😆😆