How is Pulkit different from Virat?

Let’s look at Virat’s story. He falls in love with a woman. That woman gets married to another man. He accepts that marriage but pledges to continue loving her unilaterally & staying loyal to her & not making any effort to move on. We all agree that is not only a stupid impractical unwarranted vaada, it is also morally dodgy to pledge to keep loving another man’s wife.

But come to think of it, isn’t Dr Pulkit also doing the exact same thing, albeit as an unspoken vaada to himself instead of to the woman? As far as he knows Devi married someone else. While she may have been “forced” by her elders, she was an educated adult when it happened. If his marriage with her was legal he should have fought all out for her. If he decided to throw in the towel & accept her marriage to another man, then like a gentleman should he not have put her memory away in a corner of his heart, tried to move on & lead a regular life, instead of continuing to hanker after her? In all probability he has pics of her that he might be looking at often.

If Devi was indeed married off to another, how wld that guy feel about a former lover still pining for & adoring his wife’s pics? I feel the show is romanticising these things in a very light way while in reality they are serious moral dilemmas.

I am myself not sure in my mind of the rights & wrongs here as it is a moral minefield. Plus, we don’t know enough of the Devi-Pulkit backstory. But I think we have enough machoority in this forum to discuss this somewhat contrarian view, hence bringing it up 😊
Eagerly look forward to reading more views on it.

Nhi nhi Virat aur uski epic love story ka toh koi mukabla hi nahi hai

And Devi Pulkit definitely 2 din se jada hi ek dusre ko jante the toh unka pyar firbhi believable higa, aur waise bhi abhi hume puri kahani nahi pata ki Pukkit ko kya bataya gya, Devi aur uski bacchi usko kaise mili, kaku aur gang ne kya kya kia, etc. Toh wo jane bina we can't compare their story with anyone, specially the epic love saga

Originally posted by: Bana

Let’s look at Virat’s story. He falls in love with a woman. That woman gets married to another man. He accepts that marriage but pledges to continue loving her unilaterally & staying loyal to her & not making any effort to move on. We all agree that is not only a stupid impractical unwarranted vaada, it is also morally dodgy to pledge to keep loving another man’s wife.

But come to think of it, isn’t Dr Pulkit also doing the exact same thing, albeit as an unspoken vaada to himself instead of to the woman? As far as he knows Devi married someone else. While she may have been “forced” by her elders, she was an educated adult when it happened. If his marriage with her was legal he should have fought all out for her. If he decided to throw in the towel & accept her marriage to another man, then like a gentleman should he not have put her memory away in a corner of his heart, tried to move on & lead a regular life, instead of continuing to hanker after her? In all probability he has pics of her that he might be looking at often.

If Devi was indeed married off to another, how wld that guy feel about a former lover still pining for & adoring his wife’s pics? I feel the show is romanticising these things in a very light way while in reality they are serious moral dilemmas.

I am myself not sure in my mind of the rights & wrongs here as it is a moral minefield. Plus, we don’t know enough of the Devi-Pulkit backstory. But I think we have enough machoority in this forum to discuss this somewhat contrarian view, hence bringing it up 😊
Eagerly look forward to reading more views on it.

As far as we know, there has been very little information provided to us about DevKit. So I don't want to make assumptions but maybe Kaku blackmailed him indirectly. Her husband was the DSP a powerful position, plus Ninad must have also been in the army around that time so he could have backed off.

Devi Tai might have been sedated and then slowly driven to her current state. Kaku does mention to her devars that Devi's Raaz should stay a Raaz and no one should know especially Sai.

I think somewhere Kaku knows that Sai will raise her voice against injustice regardless of who is standing in front of her as she voices in the upcoming episode.

They might have also told the family a different story regarding Devi Tai. Also, Devi Tai never brought up her husband and marriage before Sai came into the picture so there might be something really fishy about what Kaku has done and how she manipulated the entire story which makes everyone including Virat and Samrat (two sensible servicemen) not doubt Devi Tai's condition.

Sai coming into the picture is a direct threat to Kaku and she knows that if sai finds the truth she will prove it to everyone by hook or crook and no one will be able to save her.

Plus Pulikt sir had shifted away, he has only returned now. you know he could also have been blackmailed for Devi Tai's life. We know what all Kaku is capable of so it won't be surprising if she told Pulkit Sir that Devi's life will be in danger. ( she doesn't need to meet him or know him to make this threat reach Pulkit)

Devi Tai is already scared that someone will harm her husband so she doesn't even tell sai his name cause she knows the house is big but Kaku's Nazar is sharp.

Hopefully, the CV's will reveal the entire past and not conveniently forget this incident.

we are still clueless about pulkit-devyani backstory what really happened and with parts and bits i can't even come to a conclusion the only think i can conclue is C-gang involve in it and they are monsters not be even call human who the hell does to their daughter this after sai expose the truth what is virat going to say about his adarsh family and for god sake virat chanvan you are a IPS officer

virat is immature and highly emotional and that 2 days yoga love is not live but infatuation and attraction if it was true love pakkhi would not misunderstand virat and agree to marry samrat nor virat ask pakkhi to marry samrat. Love the main foundation is trust and understanding where is that in their relationship i see none even now when they are friends they do not understand the meaning of love marriage friendship relationships they just made a joke out of it. Now coming to that stupid promise he made to pakkhi which his destroying not only his married life but also pakkhi's married life as that one promise binded her not to move on and making her enter the dark path

promises are meant to be broken but at the same think before you make a promise when virat made the promise he did not think abt consequences,he was actually driven by his emotions and there was no control over

virat-pulkit is two different stories

pulkit was helpless and maybe he had a reason but virat was immature and stupid

Originally posted by: Bana

Let’s look at Virat’s story. He falls in love with a woman. That woman gets married to another man. He accepts that marriage but pledges to continue loving her unilaterally & staying loyal to her & not making any effort to move on. We all agree that is not only a stupid impractical unwarranted vaada, it is also morally dodgy to pledge to keep loving another man’s wife.

But come to think of it, isn’t Dr Pulkit also doing the exact same thing, albeit as an unspoken vaada to himself instead of to the woman? As far as he knows Devi married someone else. While she may have been “forced” by her elders, she was an educated adult when it happened. If his marriage with her was legal he should have fought all out for her. If he decided to throw in the towel & accept her marriage to another man, then like a gentleman should he not have put her memory away in a corner of his heart, tried to move on & lead a regular life, instead of continuing to hanker after her? In all probability he has pics of her that he might be looking at often.

If Devi was indeed married off to another, how wld that guy feel about a former lover still pining for & adoring his wife’s pics? I feel the show is romanticising these things in a very light way while in reality they are serious moral dilemmas.

I am myself not sure in my mind of the rights & wrongs here as it is a moral minefield. Plus, we don’t know enough of the Devi-Pulkit backstory. But I think we have enough machoority in this forum to discuss this somewhat contrarian view, hence bringing it up 😊
Eagerly look forward to reading more views on it.

According to me Virat’s and Pulkit’s stories are really different.

Devyani and Pulkit seem to have dated for quite some time, got married, had a KID, and then he believes she left him for another man, a man her family approved of. It seems Devyani was blackmailed into not meeting him ever again, if she didn’t want him to get hurt.

Pakhi and Virat knew each other for literally 2 days. They didn’t have a relationship at all, they were barely acquaintances, while Devi and Pulkit were a married couple.

Then Pakhi and Virat had a stupid misunderstanding. She agreed on HER OWN, without being pressured, to marry another guy. Virat gets to know about this, and still let her go. From what we’ve seen, I believe Pulkit never made the decision of letting Devi marry a man she herself didn’t want to marry.

Virat, on the other hand, insisted that Pakhi get married to his brother, even when she didn’t want to. His plan was to pine for his brother’s wife his entire life while living in the same house as her. (How much ever we hate Pakhi, he did give her a false sense of hope). Listening to his advice in hopes of an EMA, was Pakhi’s stupid decision tho.

Devyani and Pulkit’s decisions were made for them by other people, and it seems like Pulkit has also been kept in the dark. Pakhi and Virat made all their decisions themselves.

Apart from the fact that they both lost their loves (in Virat’s case ‘love’ lol), there’s not a lot of similarity.

Originally posted by: Svt611

As far as we know, there has been very little information provided to us about DevKit. So I don't want to make assumptions but maybe Kaku blackmailed him indirectly. Her husband was the DSP a powerful position, plus Ninad must have also been in the army around that time so he could have backed off.

Devi Tai might have been sedated and then slowly driven to her current state. Kaku does mention to her devars that Devi's Raaz should stay a Raaz and no one should know especially Sai.

I think somewhere Kaku knows that Sai will raise her voice against injustice regardless of who is standing in front of her as she voices in the upcoming episode.

They might have also told the family a different story regarding Devi Tai. Also, Devi Tai never brought up her husband and marriage before Sai came into the picture so there might be something really fishy about what Kaku has done and how she manipulated the entire story which makes everyone including Virat and Samrat (two sensible servicemen) not doubt Devi Tai's condition.

Sai coming into the picture is a direct threat to Kaku and she knows that if sai finds the truth she will prove it to everyone by hook or crook and no one will be able to save her.

Plus Pulikt sir had shifted away, he has only returned now. you know he could also have been blackmailed for Devi Tai's life. We know what all Kaku is capable of so it won't be surprising if she told Pulkit Sir that Devi's life will be in danger. ( she doesn't need to meet him or know him to make this threat reach Pulkit)

Devi Tai is already scared that someone will harm her husband so she doesn't even tell sai his name cause she knows the house is big but Kaku's Nazar is sharp.

Hopefully, the CV's will reveal the entire past and not conveniently forget this incident.

i'd rather not comment on two days yoga love story...

🌀🌀🌀🌀🌀🌀🌀

While we don't know the story yet, it would be very presumptuous to say that Pulkit's yearning for his wife and mother of his biological child, who has been separated from him due to a misunderstanding orchestrated by the family for "honour's sake" or whatever reason is the same as Virat's "yearning" for his "1.47 hours wala love", which he had the full opportunity to claim.

Getting separated after confessing and fighting for your love due to misunderstandings or circumstances and surrendering in defeat for whatever reason is different from not putting up a fight at all and claiming martyrdom. Give me a man with Pulkit's spine any day.

Originally posted by: Bana

Let’s look at Virat’s story. He falls in love with a woman. That woman gets married to another man. He accepts that marriage but pledges to continue loving her unilaterally & staying loyal to her & not making any effort to move on. We all agree that is not only a stupid impractical unwarranted vaada, it is also morally dodgy to pledge to keep loving another man’s wife.

But come to think of it, isn’t Dr Pulkit also doing the exact same thing, albeit as an unspoken vaada to himself instead of to the woman? As far as he knows Devi married someone else. While she may have been “forced” by her elders, she was an educated adult when it happened. If his marriage with her was legal he should have fought all out for her. If he decided to throw in the towel & accept her marriage to another man, then like a gentleman should he not have put her memory away in a corner of his heart, tried to move on & lead a regular life, instead of continuing to hanker after her? In all probability he has pics of her that he might be looking at often.

If Devi was indeed married off to another, how wld that guy feel about a former lover still pining for & adoring his wife’s pics? I feel the show is romanticising these things in a very light way while in reality they are serious moral dilemmas.

I am myself not sure in my mind of the rights & wrongs here as it is a moral minefield. Plus, we don’t know enough of the Devi-Pulkit backstory. But I think we have enough machoority in this forum to discuss this somewhat contrarian view, hence bringing it up 😊
Eagerly look forward to reading more views on it.

I think, we can NOT compare pulkit with vaada boy! (totally different situations).

@ bold - may I suggest a add on?

Virat forces/requests That woman to get married to another man - that too his own brother, she agrees as that way she can live with her love 2 days wala love (she planned ema before marriage with samrat) .

Even if virat thought to love pp only forever (no harm, if he is NOT telling pp or not showing up in family, or not giving his nod to all her delusions) & treating her as vahini only thereafter: is OK.

In short, any act that may harm/hurt that other person (or any other person) you claim to love: emotionally, socially or physically ... IS TERRIBLY WRONG.

giving her (to be vahini) vaada is moral less ... he gave his approval/hope of ema to vahini indirectly & being a pendulum is cringeworthy - he wants both of them around him !

As far shown: pulkit only knows devi is married to some one else,

chawans might have warned him: to harm him or their daughter if he interfere devi's married life ... or something like that.... and probably that little life's sake he moved away from the city and devi (my guess).

Here, pulkit having her picture - what is wrong in that?? (I guess, she was his wife once, they have a daughter together)

he is not showing everyone

not bothering her anyway, after knowing she is married - never looked back!

If Pulkit thinks that Devyani is married to someone else it means they weren't legally married. Otherwise both could have sued the Chavans. They were probably secretly married. Chavans made Devyani believe that they have harmed him or threated to harm him. They made believe Pulkit that Devyani was married to someone else. If they weren't legally married than he couldn't have fought for his love. And the difference between ViraKhi and DevKit is 1. Devkit had a real love story unlike ViraKhi's 2 days wala love. 2. Pulkit is not confused between two women like Virat nor is he creating trouble or expecting anything from a married woman like Pakhi. If he loved a woman, doesn't matter if she is married or not, the feelings will stay.

Originally posted by: MuguetDScorpion

If Pulkit thinks that Devyani is married to someone else it means they weren't legally married. Otherwise both could have sued the Chavans. They were probably secretly married. Chavans made Devyani believe that they have harmed him or threated to harm him. They made believe Pulkit that Devyani was married to someone else. If they weren't legally married than he couldn't have fought for his love. And the difference between ViraKhi and DevKit is 1. Devkit had a real love story unlike ViraKhi's 2 days wala love. 2. Pulkit is not confused between two women like Virat nor is he creating trouble or expecting anything from a married woman like Pakhi. If he loved a woman, doesn't matter if she is married or not, the feelings will stay.

underlined - that is the main difference in characters, I can not digest that flaw in ML !

@ bold - agree ! I told same thing twice in this forum - loving someone else who is married (or not) - not moral less as we can not control feelings.

Acting upon that feeling, without thinking consequences of that act - is WRONG

Harming/hurting (emotionally, socially or physically) someone else for that love is terribly wrong.

Showing affection on vahini is moral less

Playing with two person's (one of them is vahini, we regard vahini as mother😈) emotions is disgusting, cringeworthy (out of words) !