Do they have any idea what marriage is? - Page 2

He made the promise but she didn’t need to marry someone else for it .. if she wanted to move on, she could have but that promise was solely virats. A lot of people can tell me something tomorrow but that doesn’t mean I’ll marry someone just to be close to someone else. Marriage is huge to be messing around, it’s a commitment you make to THAT person that you marry.

I think when Virat and Sai got married he knew he can’t ever leave Sai and they will forever be married which is why he took his time to apply sindoor. However he told Sai she can do whatever she wants .. he will never tie her down.. maybe he didn’t know she will say okay I’ll leave. He obs doesn’t want her to leave and even in the fight wala episode when she said I don’t care abt what family thinks bc she doesn’t want to stay there he said “aisa nahi Hota hain” .. he’s really desperate to try her to be calm and tactful so it’s easier for him and her to stay in the house forever ..

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Virat ko to pata ta hain ki shaadi kya hoti hain , sorry he never stopped pakhi . It was only pakhi's dumbness . Virat is culprit of samrat not pakhi in any way.

Regarding sairat unki marriage unexpected circumstances mein hui thi , I guess they didn't thought much at that time .

Completely agreed! Pakhi is responsible for her own plight because for some stupid reason a promise of celibacy was satisfactory to her to be able to agree to marry samrat.... on the other hand virat is only responsible for betraying samrat by not telling him that the girl who is set to marry him is in love with his brother and virat hid all the truth from samrat. So pakhi does not get to act like a victim and neither is virat answerable to her because he did not cheat her, he only cheated his brother. Pakhi basically cheated herself only with such a stupid decision. She made two stupid decisions. First to marry samrat on her own will as a rebound to get over virat over a silly misunderstanding of her own, then again agreeing to marry him just because virat convinced her to marry samrat on the promise of staying single for the rest of his life. It makes me question the IQ level of pakhi. 🤪

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Virat - pakhi tumhare pyar mere pass humesha rahega , lekin tum sai ko pareshan karna or usse akela chod do .( If he says so )

Will pakhi agree to it ? Stop instigating chavans against sai.

Infact virat only said in chilli grinding episode to pakhi stop taunting sai , she immediately raise her voice on him . Why that time pakhi don't stopped.

Do u really she listen to virat or anyone else ?

Precisely. It's because pakhi can see that the time is not far when virat will get over pakhi completely and move on with sai. She feels threatened, hence why she doesn't even care to listen to virat's request of leaving sai alone and instead pakhi constantly fishes for moments to taunt sai, will taunt sai even if sai does not give her any such opportunity, and then also has the nerve to barge into virat-sai's bedroom and conversations whenever she wants just to instigate virat against sai. Matlab koi sharam aur hayaa bachcha bhi nahi hai pakhi mein ab. Now it seems to me pakhi was always this egoistic girl, that's why she so easily got annoyed when she realised virat did not save her number and decided to marry someone else, then even agree to marry samrat on basis of virat celibacy promise.... because the idea of virat staying alone and unwed for the rest of his life just to remain loyal to pakhi is something that makes her feel a great sense of importance and value.

Originally posted by: Nandini6

Pakhi should have thought before marrying Samrat , its her life she can't agree blindly for everything. In my opinion it's Pakhi's fault, if she never asked for the promise then why she expects virat not to break that ...its too silly🤪 Education doesn't teach you maturity , its your upbringing which teaches you.

Yeah and now anytime she feels virat is not following through with his promise she says the same old "I did not even ask for such a vaada" blah blah blah to guilt trip him and to keep him in her shackles. She didn't ask for the vaada but she expects him to stick to it nonetheless.

Originally posted by: Zahra15

Exactly my views.

Virat should have never told Pakhi to go for the marriage by making that promise.

Marry or not to narry, he should have left that solely on her.

Yes, he could have "broken up" so as not to hurt his fsmily, but he had no right to indirectly force her.

Like Pakhi said, he ruined 3 lives with that, and now a fourth one. Samrat didn't deserve this.

I'm sorry to say, although I agree that virat did something very very stupid and wrong by giving such a promise, I only agree that he cheated and hurt his brother by doing this because samrat has the right to know that the girl he is about to marry loves his brother and virat had no right to cover up the truth from him by using such a lie.

Where I disagree with you is saying that virat forced pakhi to marry her. How did he force her? He neither blackmailed or threatened her. He merely convinced her by promising her something that at the time he thought was an achievable promise, without realising how unpredictable life is and someday or the other the family would have gotten virat married even if he had not married sai.

Before we say that virat forced pakhi to marry samrat, we have to ask what was it about that promise that virat gave her for which she agreed willingly to marry samrat when she had the option to not accept virat's promise or marrying samrat, especially considering virat did not have her at gun point to accept this deal of celibacy in exchange for her marrying his brother. What did pakhi see in that promise that made her willing to become samrat's wife if virat stuck to a life of bachelorhood and not showing any interest in any other woman?

I believe she saw two things. One was a nice stroke to her ego to think a guy will remain single for her and live his entire life in the memory of her love whilst she still gets to live the life of a married woman with another man in the same house as virat, meaning virat would at least remain in front of her eyes because if she refused to marry samrat, then virat would not have anything to do with her for the sake of his family. The other, which is the most perverse is, that pakhi saw it as a proposal from virat of him continuing to have a romantic relationship with her even after she marries his brother, i.e., she felt virat would willingly have an extra marital affair with her behind his brother's back, but only ask her to remain as his brother's wife just for the happiness of his family. 🤢

Originally posted by: Guiltyo0o

But the fact is, pakki who destroyed ( her, samrat, virat, sai)

If she didn't accept the promise and marry samrat, none of this will happens, every one will move on eventually.

I hoped, the story begins with her getting married without the knowledge of virat

It will be a 3 triangle love story without a stupid promise that is not believe worthy

I seriously wonder how the story would have been if virat returned married to sai after samrat-pakhi got married and pakhi getting to know virat is samrat's brother only after her grah pravesh. Because if virat-sai got married and then virat returned with sai only to get to know that pakhi is now his brother's wife, virat would already be a married man and would not have then made a celibacy promise, but then again I suspect that virat, to convince pakhi to remain as samrat's wife would have told pakhi that his and sai marriage is a deal shaadi and that they will both separate once sai becomes doctor and pakhi then expecting from virat that things happen as per the assurance he has given her that sai and him will separate eventually, so I guess the story may have ended up exact same, just with slight change.

Originally posted by: prs_725

He made the promise but she didn’t need to marry someone else for it .. if she wanted to move on, she could have but that promise was solely virats. A lot of people can tell me something tomorrow but that doesn’t mean I’ll marry someone just to be close to someone else. Marriage is huge to be messing around, it’s a commitment you make to THAT person that you marry.

I think when Virat and Sai got married he knew he can’t ever leave Sai and they will forever be married which is why he took his time to apply sindoor. However he told Sai she can do whatever she wants .. he will never tie her down.. maybe he didn’t know she will say okay I’ll leave. He obs doesn’t want her to leave and even in the fight wala episode when she said I don’t care abt what family thinks bc she doesn’t want to stay there he said “aisa nahi Hota hain” .. he’s really desperate to try her to be calm and tactful so it’s easier for him and her to stay in the house forever ..

True, I don't recall virat saying when they were about to marry that sai will have to leave after she becomes doctor and neither virat said to her that they will remain together only till she becomes doctor. All he had said is that he will never be able to give her husband love and that she cannot expect anything else other than care and support from him. It was sai who had said that they will only remain married until she becomes doctor. Meaning virat of course did not marry sai with intention of leaving her at any point, and this is a very interesting point actually, because that means virat married her with intention of always looking after her, and he merely gave her option knowing that she does not want to marry him that he will not keep her chained and she can leave if she wants. Virat leaving sai was not a decision he made for himself or them and neither was it an option that he had offered to himself, it was only an option that he left for sai if she in future does not want to be in this marriage. Interesting!

Originally posted by: sammy17

Where I disagree with you is saying that virat forced pakhi to marry her. How did he force her? He neither blackmailed or threatened her. He merely convinced her by promising her something that at the time he thought was an achievable promise, without realising how unpredictable life is and someday or the other the family would have gotten virat married even if he had not married sai.

They of all people should know that love can happen in 2 days. Didn't Virat hope that Pakhi will eventually come to love his brother? So how can he stop his heart from loving someone.

Both were emotional at that point and behaved without thinking thoroughly, Virat by giving the promise and Pakhi by accepting it.

Like you said if Virat does so much for his family, will he refuse if his kaku asked him to marry at some point later.

But though Virat didn't discuss his promise with anyone, Pakhi however discuss it with both her parents and got some sane advice which she choose to ignore.

I believe she saw two things. One was a nice stroke to her ego to think a guy will remain single for her and live his entire life in the memory of her love whilst she still gets to live the life of a married woman with another man in the same house as virat, meaning virat would at least remain in front of her eyes because if she refused to marry samrat, then virat would not have anything to do with her for the sake of his family.

Totally agree.

The other, which is the most perverse is, that pakhi saw it as a proposal from virat of him continuing to have a romantic relationship with her even after she marries his brother, i.e., she felt virat would willingly have an extra marital affair with her behind his brother's back, but only ask her to remain as his brother's wife just for the happiness of his family. 🤢

Virat was wrong to tell Pakhi after his wedding with Sai that I still love you. Not defending Pakhi, but what will Pakhi make of it?

I understand he didn't want Pakhi to create a scene at their home when he comes with Sai, but telling his brother's wife that he loves her .

That kind of gave another hope to Pakhi that he will remain Sai's husband only for namesake but will continue to love her and have extra marital affair.

Originally posted by: sukri

Virat really did sicken me there. It was by telling her that he loves her even despite pakhi being his brother;s wife now and virat himself now being married to sai that now made it virat's fault for what pakhi is doing. He crossed a line there just to give pakhi and her delicate feelings some assurance, yet him having crossed the line this once time after his marriage to sai and samrat-pakhi marriage is what has encouraged pakhi to repeatedly cross the line from now on.

Both vahini and virat's brains works in weird ways.... Vahini thought she will marry samrat and be close to virat... Yeh nahi socha virat will be eventually pressurised by his family to get married... He being only child of his parents will never be allowed to reamain a celibate.

Virat must have thought vahini will move on eventually as samrat is a nice guy and likes her too... He was anyway posted in GC toh she wont see him everyday... But he didn't know how obsessed vahini was with him.... Saamne nahi bhi rahoon toh she will keep reminding him of his promise through phone calls.