What are the expectations?? - Page 2

Originally posted by: ..Peppermint..

I don't know about Virat, but I hate how Pakhi feels entitled in that "friendship"...

Heck they've known each other for one week at most...and Pakhi calls him at every opportunity, questions him about his job, tells him to come back to her because she feels lonely????? I'm sorry, this is not friendship.

In real life, nobody would want a friend like Pakhi because she is plain selfish, what's with forcing your bestie to come to your parents house at midnight because you want to rant about your 2 day wala pyaar....

And virat needs to put a stop to that as soon as possible. And Pakhi needs to wake up.

@Bold Obviously it is not friendship, it is something more than that...i don't think a girl will keep calling her friend and cries continuously saying "Comeback I need you"

Pakhi calls herself Virat's friend but acts as his wife.

@RED last time I was thinking to put that here you go...on that her friend is married she kept telling her it is late but she was adamant this is not friendship she was simply using her, I need you and you MUST come...🤢

Originally posted by: Chattering-Lory

I want the makers of this show to follow the ORIGINAL version that is in BENGALI. I think till now except for some minor changes like Sai in safe house they are religiously following the Bengali version. I happened to watch few scenes from the original on Hotstar and I must say it was amazing! All the characters over there Emon (Sayi), Ronojoy (Virat), Roopkotha (Pakhi) were soo good 👏👏in their respective roles. Even Roopkatha was great to watch. All the leads seemed to renowned actors and their acting skills were first rate and not at all irritating or OTT. I think this is very essential to captivate the viewers who don't prefer to watch exaggerated drama. I haven't watched the entire series but the scenes I had a glimpse of were on point. The other versions might be good as well but since this show is a remake of the original I want the makers to stick to the Bengali version and minor changes here and there do happen depending on the actors' availability, budget, creativity etc.

Here they will need to make changes like Samraat should not die but must return back.

It also depends on Indian viewers and their thoughts...

Here Pakhi is a bit of a pathetic character....

After watching the tamil version my thoughts about Pakhi changed.

Although Pakhi's actions seem to show her obsessed over Virat thereby portraying her in a bad light she is a victim over here.

The one that loved her sacrificed their love for his brother and family. On the other hand the one who married her left her on the altar without even hearing her explanation leaving her all alone in a new place with a few people who are hostile to her. Her only support system is Virat who is also far away from her.

In the tamil version when Samrat returns she asks him and the other family members some pertinent questions.

Like how most of the audience thinks negatively only about pakhi and not about Virat she asks the family members why only she is seen as the bad one while Virat is seen as a victim although they both were equally wrong and both sacrificed their love. Also she asks Samrat why he decided to leave her without even seeking her side of the story and her explanation for not telling him the truth.

I hope the hindi makers follow the tamil version post Samrat's entry instead of the original bengali version where Samrat dies halfway through. whereas in the tamil version Samrat and Pakhi realise their mistakes and have a happy ending to their story.

Originally posted by: ALUJNA21

Here they will need to make changes like Samraat should not die but must return back.

It also depends on Indian viewers and their thoughts...

Here Pakhi is a bit of a pathetic character....

I won't mind if they keep Samrat alive but the extreme pain and annoyance Pakhi brings in his life is such that he will be gradually heartbroken and perish. It's actually consistent with the constant mental torment he faces. That's why they showed him depart in the original series.

Even if Samrat remains alive here he shouldn't end up with Pakhi who is self-centered and causes him great suffering with her unmindful actions rather he should move on, marry another girl of his choice and lead a happy life. I would prefer to see him marry an army widow because because being an army man he can easily understand the genuine feelings of army wives who truly respect and are devoted to the profession and their spouse.😊

Originally posted by: Chattering-Lory

I won't mind if they keep Samrat alive but the extreme pain and annoyance Pakhi brings in his life is such that he will be gradually heartbroken and perish. It's actually consistent with the constant mental torment he faces. That's why they showed him depart in the original series.

Even if Samrat remains alive here he shouldn't end up with Pakhi who is self-centered and causes him great suffering with her unmindful actions rather he should move on, marry another girl of his choice and lead a happy life. I would prefer to see him marry an army widow because because being an army man he can easily understand the genuine feelings of army wives who truly respect and are devoted to the profession and their spouse.😊

Once in a post I also stated that Samraat needs to return back all mentally strong and needs to get a new girl with whom he will fall in love. He also has the right to be Ghum hain kisi ke pyaar main.

This right is not entitled only to Pakhi and Virat.

Originally posted by: tulasi99

After watching the tamil version my thoughts about Pakhi changed.

Although Pakhi's actions seem to show her obsessed over Virat thereby portraying her in a bad light she is a victim over here.

The one that loved her sacrificed their love for his brother and family. On the other hand the one who married her left her on the altar without even hearing her explanation leaving her all alone in a new place with a few people who are hostile to her. Her only support system is Virat who is also far away from her.

In the tamil version when Samrat returns she asks him and the other family members some pertinent questions.

Like how most of the audience thinks negatively only about pakhi and not about Virat she asks the family members why only she is seen as the bad one while Virat is seen as a victim although they both were equally wrong and both sacrificed their love. Also she asks Samrat why he decided to leave her without even seeking her side of the story and her explanation for not telling him the truth.

I hope the hindi makers follow the tamil version post Samrat's entry instead of the original bengali version where Samrat dies halfway through. whereas in the tamil version Samrat and Pakhi realise their mistakes and have a happy ending to their story.

Hai Tulasi, I haven't watched the Tamil version but at least in this hindi show named 'Ghum hai kisi ke pyaar mein' I don't think Pakhi's actions can be justified.

Even before Virat asked Pakhi to sacrifice and marry his brother, Pakhi and her family proceeded with Samrat and family's alliance. During their first meeting Pakhi didn't reveal anything to Samrat about her love affair. Instead she remained silent throughout till her Haldi. Wasn't that cheating? She was even asked to back out if she didn't wish to marry but she did not instead gave her consent for the wedding to take place in 3 days. It's not that Samrat and family forced her into this relationship. During her Haldi she saw Virat and then after knowing what happened she wanted to reveal the truth to elders and marry Virat. She would have married Samrat if Virat didn't appear before her but since she met Virat she wanted to proceed with him. Clearly we can see nothing but selfishness!

And also what kind of love is that!? In scenario 1 she was in love with Virat. In scenario 2 she couldn't trust Virat and blocked his number. This meant she no longer wished to be in contact with him. Love disappeared here. Trust is nowhere to be seen. In Scenario 3 she moved on to marry Samrat but didn't reveal any of the details from her past affair. In scenario 4 she confronted Virat, got to know what happened and wanted to break the marriage alliance with Samrat and marry Virat. In scenario 5 she married Samrat, entered as Samrat's wife and took promise from Virat that he wouldn't see any other girl all his life.

It's not that she's in love with Virat throughout right from their first meeting. Her feelings kept changing.

Also we all here agree with the point that Virat was stupid enough to request Pakhi to marry his brother despite knowing it's only an arranged marriage setting and he will always be criticized for that. Leave Pakhi he has ruined his brother Samrat's life, by taking this decision, who has nothing to do with and was unaware of all this nonsense.

Whatever reason, how appropriate it is to keep the person whom you are going to get married unaware of your past affair? I have seen people in real world too do the same thing. At some point in their life they get married keeping their spouse in dark about their previous relationship(s). That's fine if your partner too had his/her own set of relationships and didn't reveal anything to you. Still it's not a good thing for both the sides if they are aiming for a long lasting happy marriage. But what about people like Samrat who believe and get married in the arranged setting? What mistake they have exactly done to suffer such cheating? Pakhi didn't want to proceed with the wedding NOT because she was feeling guilt for cheating Samrat or due to some thoughtfulness about his life and future but just because she found Virat and he cleared her misunderstanding. So why anyone else? Samrat is just an use and throw tissue paper. Why should we expect someone to marry a person who doesn't trust them. It was Pakhi who couldn't trust Virat and blocked his number in haste and decided to move on with another person. So why should Virat feel obliged to marry her? He should definitely have told the truth to his family members not for the sake of marrying Pakhi but to save Samrat from this weird situation. Seeing a person for 2-3 days and liking him/her is different from having love and trust for someone. For Pakhi it's the first case. Her relationship with Virat wasn't that deep. It's clearly shown that she couldn't trust him. She regretted when she came to know the truth. Her guilt of losing him due to her own mistake has turned into obsession. That's why she demanded him not to see any other girl all his life and remain only hers'.

Overall how she's a victim over here?? I don't understand.

Originally posted by: Chattering-Lory

Hai Tulasi, I haven't watched the Tamil version but at least in this hindi show named 'Ghum hai kisi ke pyaar mein' I don't think Pakhi's actions can be justified.

Even before Virat asked Pakhi to sacrifice and marry his brother, Pakhi and her family proceeded with Samrat and family's alliance. During their first meeting Pakhi didn't reveal anything to Samrat about her love affair. Instead she remained silent throughout till her Haldi. Wasn't that cheating? She was even asked to back out if she didn't wish to marry but she did not instead gave her consent for the wedding to take place in 3 days. It's not that Samrat and family forced her into this relationship. During her Haldi she saw Virat and then after knowing what happened she wanted to reveal the truth to elders and marry Virat. She would have married Samrat if Virat didn't appear before her but since she met Virat she wanted to proceed with him. Clearly we can see nothing but selfishness!

And also what kind of love is that!? In scenario 1 she was in love with Virat. In scenario 2 she couldn't trust Virat and blocked his number. This meant she no longer wished to be in contact with him. Love disappeared here. Trust is nowhere to be seen. In Scenario 3 she moved on to marry Samrat but didn't reveal any of the details from her past affair. In scenario 4 she confronted Virat, got to know what happened and wanted to break the marriage alliance with Samrat and marry Virat. In scenario 5 she married Samrat, entered as Samrat's wife and took promise from Virat that he wouldn't see any other girl all his life.

It's not that she's in love with Virat throughout right from their first meeting. Her feelings kept changing.

Also we all here agree with the point that Virat was stupid enough to request Pakhi to marry his brother despite knowing it's only an arranged marriage setting and he will always be criticized for that. Leave Pakhi he has ruined his brother Samrat's life, by taking this decision, who has nothing to do with and was unaware of all this nonsense.

Whatever reason, how appropriate it is to keep the person whom you are going to get married unaware of your past affair? I have seen people in real world too do the same thing. At some point in their life they get married keeping their spouse in dark about their previous relationship(s). That's fine if your partner too had his/her own set of relationships and didn't reveal anything to you. Still it's not a good thing for both the sides if they are aiming for a long lasting happy marriage. But what about people like Samrat who believe and get married in the arranged setting? What mistake they have exactly done to suffer such cheating? Pakhi didn't want to proceed with the wedding NOT because she was feeling guilt for cheating Samrat or due to some thoughtfulness about his life and future but just because she found Virat and he cleared her misunderstanding. So why anyone else? Samrat is just an use and throw tissue paper. Why should we expect someone to marry a person who doesn't trust them. It was Pakhi who couldn't trust Virat and blocked his number in haste and decided to move on with another person. So why should Virat feel obliged to marry her? He should definitely have told the truth to his family members not for the sake of marrying Pakhi but to save Samrat from this weird situation. Seeing a person for 2-3 days and liking him/her is different from having love and trust for someone. For Pakhi it's the first case. Her relationship with Virat wasn't that deep. It's clearly shown that she couldn't trust him. She regretted when she came to know the truth. Her guilt of losing him due to her own mistake has turned into obsession. That's why she demanded him not to see any other girl all his life and remain only hers'.

Overall how she's a victim over here?? I don't understand.

Couldn't agree more..u explained it perfectly.what is she was she thinking while getting married to samrat!! She wasn't forced by chavhan family .even her father was ready to support her but she got married to samrat. It's call cheating/ betrayel.

Now she doesn't care for anything .behaving like a obsessed person . What is her and Virat thinking!! Platonic relationship??

Originally posted by: A4Anjie

- I have no problem if pakhi calls virat if it is just friendly talk... like she would talk with that other devar in house... (sorry forgot the name)...

- BUT she keeps reminding him about their past feelings/promises (or whatever)... and she is trying to reinstate that .... which is EMA now.

Exactly!! first off it is her always calling Virat... I only saw Virat calling Pakhi in the last episode before Sai committed suicide. She somehow thinks she OWNS him because of that promise and hate to say it Virat is totally allowing her to do it. If he straight up just cleared things up then Pakhi might have let him go if she has self-dignity. I swear it is like she doesn't want Virat to forget about her for even one second and kind of guilt-trips him in remembering the promise. IDK but she seems like a psychopath or mentally unstable to me.

Originally posted by: ALUJNA21

Once in a post I also stated that Samraat needs to return back all mentally strong and needs to get a new girl with whom he will fall in love. He also has the right to be Ghum hain kisi ke pyaar main.

This right is not entitled only to Pakhi and Virat.

🤣🤣

True, the right is not entitled only to Pakhi and Virat😆

Originally posted by: Chattering-Lory

Hai Tulasi, I haven't watched the Tamil version but at least in this hindi show named 'Ghum hai kisi ke pyaar mein' I don't think Pakhi's actions can be justified.

Even before Virat asked Pakhi to sacrifice and marry his brother, Pakhi and her family proceeded with Samrat and family's alliance. During their first meeting Pakhi didn't reveal anything to Samrat about her love affair. Instead she remained silent throughout till her Haldi. Wasn't that cheating? She was even asked to back out if she didn't wish to marry but she did not instead gave her consent for the wedding to take place in 3 days. It's not that Samrat and family forced her into this relationship. During her Haldi she saw Virat and then after knowing what happened she wanted to reveal the truth to elders and marry Virat. She would have married Samrat if Virat didn't appear before her but since she met Virat she wanted to proceed with him. Clearly we can see nothing but selfishness!

And also what kind of love is that!? In scenario 1 she was in love with Virat. In scenario 2 she couldn't trust Virat and blocked his number. This meant she no longer wished to be in contact with him. Love disappeared here. Trust is nowhere to be seen. In Scenario 3 she moved on to marry Samrat but didn't reveal any of the details from her past affair. In scenario 4 she confronted Virat, got to know what happened and wanted to break the marriage alliance with Samrat and marry Virat. In scenario 5 she married Samrat, entered as Samrat's wife and took promise from Virat that he wouldn't see any other girl all his life.

It's not that she's in love with Virat throughout right from their first meeting. Her feelings kept changing.

Also we all here agree with the point that Virat was stupid enough to request Pakhi to marry his brother despite knowing it's only an arranged marriage setting and he will always be criticized for that. Leave Pakhi he has ruined his brother Samrat's life, by taking this decision, who has nothing to do with and was unaware of all this nonsense.

Whatever reason, how appropriate it is to keep the person whom you are going to get married unaware of your past affair? I have seen people in real world too do the same thing. At some point in their life they get married keeping their spouse in dark about their previous relationship(s). That's fine if your partner too had his/her own set of relationships and didn't reveal anything to you. Still it's not a good thing for both the sides if they are aiming for a long lasting happy marriage. But what about people like Samrat who believe and get married in the arranged setting? What mistake they have exactly done to suffer such cheating? Pakhi didn't want to proceed with the wedding NOT because she was feeling guilt for cheating Samrat or due to some thoughtfulness about his life and future but just because she found Virat and he cleared her misunderstanding. So why anyone else? Samrat is just an use and throw tissue paper. Why should we expect someone to marry a person who doesn't trust them. It was Pakhi who couldn't trust Virat and blocked his number in haste and decided to move on with another person. So why should Virat feel obliged to marry her? He should definitely have told the truth to his family members not for the sake of marrying Pakhi but to save Samrat from this weird situation. Seeing a person for 2-3 days and liking him/her is different from having love and trust for someone. For Pakhi it's the first case. Her relationship with Virat wasn't that deep. It's clearly shown that she couldn't trust him. She regretted when she came to know the truth. Her guilt of losing him due to her own mistake has turned into obsession. That's why she demanded him not to see any other girl all his life and remain only hers'.

Overall how she's a victim over here?? I don't understand.

Woah! You nailed it!

I am not sure if partners should reveal about their past affairs to each other or not. But in this case, Samrat had all rights to know. But according to Pakhi, Samrat is just a 'path' for her to be close to Virat. I feel for him :(