You are absolutely right, with some very valid points. There are some incredibly talented actors working on the show at the moment and neither are they being given their due, nor are our fabulous leads. The careless manner in which the story and screenplay are being handled is unfair not only the audience but to the actors themselves!
In my mind, making Dev positive was not a bad idea from the start. In fact, the story was always leading to that, even with AS's remorse track and his friendship with Meera. However, making him good was not as easy a task as the present CVs assumed. The moment Geet forgave him, he ceased to be tortured by his past, which didn't figure for the viewers who were themselves still tortured by it. They didn't complexify his character in a way that was suited to his past, and much like all the characters of the show, including Lucky, Mama and Nandini, he was flattened into a prototype: good brother and devar, whose only mistake was to marry the wrong woman (NT).
Maaneet's absence could have been a blessing in disguise for the writers and CVs. Because we love our leads and would never fault them for being human, falling sick and taking a few days off, we would have been perfectly open to a track focused on the side characters. The CVs could have taken this time to really give these characters depth. Instead of the immature marriage, couldn't we have had a conflicted, tortured confession from Dev (SS would have been great in this), a shocked, appalled Nandini, a sensible older sister Geet (since poor DD was clearly shooting at least some scenes)? Or couldn't we have at least seen a legitimate reason for Lucky to have married Preeto so suddenly?
In addition to all the meaningless hide-and-seek sequences, there has been no consistency in the depiction of the supporting cast. Just one example, they made it sound like Nandini has been oppressed by her family all her life, which we know is not the case. She clearly studied away from home and was represented as headstrong, willful and pampered by her mom and brothers. This knowledge makes the impulsive marriage incredibly hard to digest. Why do the CVs not understand that one or two dialogues cannot convince us to accept something that contradicts a plot point or characterisation that has been developed already?
The way I see it, side-plots can be dealt with in two ways:
1. Support the main story, in this case Maan's ML (this is why the NT weeks were so good!)
2. Be interesting enough for viewers to want to see it independently of the main story
The side tracks in GHSP are failing to do both at this point. The strength of the office track was that all the characters fed into the Maaneet story. When they were not onscreen, they were being discussed, plotted against, suggested but that is not the case any more. Neither do any of the tracks support Maaneet, nor are the well-enough written to sustain interest on their own.
I agree with you that negativity is not bad, but negativity doesn't necessarily have to be in the form of a literal villain. It could even be the conflicts within the characters. Dev didn't have to be shown as a villain but constant conflict within himself was absolutely necessary to make his redemption track work. Turning him into a nervous, smitten comedic lover was not the answer.
Edited by skg267 - 14 years ago