If thats the case then FG shouldn't give option of janta voting. This is just to make money & nothing else. If ppl are watching just for entertainment & not looking for singer then they should switch channel to Star one where " The Gr8 Indian laughter challenge " it will make them more happy.
I donno why but i wanna bring cricket again in this topic as indian ppl will understand that only. Why don't you praise someone who doesn't perform in say may be 5 games? If someone doesn't play one inning they curse him & everyone starts he should be out. If there are 1 million who wants to be singer but can't become singer so they give vote to someone who is poor in singing then I guess there are 60 mil who wants to be cricketer, but can't become cricketer. why don't they stand behind someone who performs poor?
My guess is this whole voting thing is for money & who knows hoe real it is? in background they might making up stuff. Why don't they even mention number of votes each candidate got?
Originally posted by: texasguy
Yes..speaking about JANTA...want to justify what exactly happens when they vote..(in a nut shell)
if you take one milion janta(who vote)..all of them have the interest in singing, but could not fulill the goal of becoming a SINGER for some or the other reason..and very few of them could come up in as SINGERS(we can count them though)...so the rest of the million always want support the person who is LOW in singing(because they imagine themselves in that person..), so in that fact the least sur wala get most of the votes....and also in QAZI case he has a good performer level..so ghar may baki sab ka votes b mil jata hai..
and now for shammit and good singers ...they will get votes from people who know or havig knowledge in sur and singing will vote(which is very less % in india)...so this is the REAL problem...