Originally posted by: merrydock
as we all know that ranvi did apologize to baldev for believing rajveer. but you must know and understand that ranvi acquisition was not based on intent to hurt or punish baldev. but on the on the situations present in front of him at the time. ranvi did not frame baldev for nihals murder. rajveer did. ranvi was as much a victim of rajveers manipulation as baldev, thought baldev suffered more. for which ranvi accepted his fault and appologised. so balwant hounding ranvi to apologize to baldev is a moot point.
the current situation is of baldev making. he knowingly framed veera, and humiliated her in public. portraying her as corrupt and dishonest. and does he need to apologize to veera or not is the question of the hour.
baldev torchred veera after they married. even after she proved him innocent he still misbehaved with her and even asked for a divorce. just because she didnt trust him. today he broke her trust in the worst way. but she is the one being crucified, but why because he is baldev and what ever he does is right. and justified.
in the same vain what bansuri and manpreet are doing is right, and veera deservs to be abused by them. day in and day out.
way to go people. 👏
Any decent and sensible man would think twice before accusing anyone of murder, least of all someone he had known his whole life. Ranvi already knew that he was wrong about the alcohol case, so didn't he owe it to Baldev (a man who saved his life) to think carefully before he made any such wild accusations, knowing that this time it is matter of life and death and not just some jail time? And after how Anmol had betrayed him shouldn't he have thought twice before trusting a guy he just met, like he did with Rajveer? So it is irrelevant whether he intentionally framed Baldev or not, because his absolute stupidity and lack of any regard for Baldev led him to accuse him of murder and be horribly tortured in jail.
I don't know about you but I and many others on the forum found his apology completely insincere. It looked as if he was apologising for denting Baldev's car and not for nearly ruining Baldev's life and his sanity. And it seemed as if he was giving this half-ass apology only coz Baldev happened to be married to his sister.
I fail to see how you can call Ranvi a victim, when he didn't exhibit even an ounce of shame or guilt for his mistake?😳 And Ranvi himself proved how little thought he actually gave to this matter, when he so quickly change his witness testimony by saying that he just saw Baldev pick the weapon and stand over the body and not actually kill Nihal.
And any decent father (which Balwant is most certainly not), would blame a guy for so thoughtlessly sending his innocent son to jail, that too for a murder charge, no less!!
How Baldev behaved with Veera after they got married was horrible. But he was suffering from PTSD, he was mentally ill. His actions weren't justified but we cannot place the same amount blame on him as we can on someone of sound mind. So if you refuse to blame Ranvi for mistakenly sending Baldev to jail to be tortured why are you placing all the blame on Baldev for something he did while he was not in his right mind?😕 You can blame them for not giving sincere apologies to the victims of their actions once they realised their mistake and got back to their senses (in case of Baldev).
Have you actually been reading all of the comments recently? Hardly anyone thinks Baldev was right to betray his wife, that was horrible for any husband to do. They are all just sick of Veera and her hypocrite family's inability to assume their share of the blame.
Edited by ...-Riya-... - 10 years ago