While I can sympathize with anyone who is a victim of dogmatism, I cannot feel for Laksh!
All of us are products of our circumstances, victims of our birth and our prejudices. However, the question here is how we deal with all of these. Bharat was the son of Kaikeyi and yet he understood the distinction between right and wrong! Therein lies his greatness!
Laksh's problem is not just his orientation. He is a greedy, evil man who plotted to kill his own cousin for the sake of the throne and planned the public disrobing of his sister-in-law. He killed a man, whom he supposedly loved, to save his skin! Now he makes eyes at another man, while his lover hasn't been in the grave for more than a couple of weeks or so!
If Laksh had wanted to, he could have avoided the marriage. Or he could have confessed to Swarna! Thereafter, it would have been up to Swarna to walk out on the marriage or to try and forge a friendship with him! Instead, he and his parents made it seem like the problem lay with Swarna.
How could Swarna have exposed Laksh? If she had cited non-consummation, he would have most certainly accused her of being frigid. Precisely what his mother did! So, how does Swarna prove his orientation! She had her doubts but she had no definitive proof. When things played out differently, she probably told herself that her reading was completely wrong. Given the period the story is set in and also the social class that the character belongs to, it is but natural for her to try and give the relationship a chance!
Sorry but Laksh is absolutely despicable. As much so as his parents! He never made an effort to rise above his circumstances. And he is by and large to blame for it. Dogmas do play a part but the courageous learn to deal and overcome prejudice. Laksh is just an evil coward!
Edited by BertieWooster - 9 years ago