It is possible. One can be good but still be fallible. Is it not about finding that balance
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 18th Sept 2025
HEALING SHUROO 18.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: AFG vs SL, 11th Match, Group B at Abu Dhabi🏏
Akash Ambani constantly holding radhika's hand and waist
Deepika Removed From Kalki 2
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 18, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Nerdtastically Navratri (CC Game, Sign Up Open)
The Ba***ds Of Bollywood - Reviews
Abhishek reminds me of young Puneet Issar
VICTIM KAUN 🤧 19.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 19, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Buddhiya ki Nautanki
ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Off Air for Charlie Kirk Comments
Anupamaa 18 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
How quickly time changes
Alia bhatt special topic
Pari's hate for Tulsi
Armaan has always been the victim
Anupamaa 19 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Appreciation Post for Ruheen
It is possible. One can be good but still be fallible. Is it not about finding that balance
Originally posted by: munnihyderabad
Is she running away rabz.. we are thinking that she is not even aware that her son is alivewe were predicting of the regular ekta drama where she had a still born baby (as told by her husband or by dadaji ) and hence to forget that still born baby ,.she might have took Viren as her baby and started mothering himand the crux of it is "klhandaan ki Izzat" LOL
But the original plot was for Viren to find it hard to be second in his wife life. Which never happened! My guess still lies with the fact that the couples became so popular that they didn't want to mess with that and made them adarsh.
Originally posted by: munnihyderabad
and more over even in the conceptualizing the show they might have decided to make one couple sweet and perfect . they are so sweet and perfect that them being any bit unlike their characters will ruin the characters - you know they are on a different pedestal of perfection and Adarshnesswhile the 2nd couple they can take as much liberties as they want ...but they can never make them as Adarsh,..because if they show the second couple as perfect today.. tomorrow if they go back to being the flawed characters.. then people say there are inconsistencies ..so he flawed remains flawed .. perfect remains perfect in their own grove
but remember whn she saw Karan in the Mall.. she went to dadaji n said 'wo wapis agyaa'.. she was talking abt her son wasnt she?
Originally posted by: sennareni
Its true that ppl will not accept it... But then it still remains a fact that these too perfect characters cannot be explored and do not leave any room for evolving and remain blunt... And its high time TV shows come up with dark and grey characters... In fact these characters make for an interesting story...Shocked at the extent the bahu is made ideal these days... In one of the shows the bahu to save her husband from a crime is acting as a maid in her own house and is shown making her husband act as the hubby of the woman whose husband he killed...And a bahu who cannot stand for her self, aims to be a cop...All these makes for a good laugh...
Originally posted by: munnihyderabad
In this thread we were assuming that , as she saw him from back,.. may be she thinks it to be her husband... rather than son...and generally woh means someone other than kid..and most importantly if she knew that he kid was existing ...wouldn't she have thoughts of the baby . if not for flashbacks ...not once have seen her thinking about kid/baby .. she was staring at her mangalsutra and else ...but not one memory of baby đ˛