ShraMan/NiMik AT#34 - Tum Dena Saath Mera

First Previous

Page

109

Next Last

Frequent Posters

-Shilpaa-

@-Shilpaa-

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#151

Originally posted by: Sanika.

I HAD THE SAME REACTION.
I was like yeh kab dhapa 🤣

Even I thought the same for a sec.

I was like,Wait, what's priya's photo doing with Shravan🤣

Quote

Kritika Pawle

@FangirlForever

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#152

Ok guys Good night and sweet dreams 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

-Shilpaa-

@-Shilpaa-

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#153

Originally posted by: Sanika.

He did not give the final hearing yet na. Remember, Shravan asked for 'time' and because the stupid verma tried to undermine the judge by saying time nai milega, time mill gaya😆

Yeah.. even i felt the judge gave Shravan another chance because verma was trying to be smarta** which gave away his true intentions.. 😆

Quote

-Shilpaa-

@-Shilpaa-

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#154

Good night sani,kritika and all

Quote

Puja Bagchi

@puba

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#155

Originally posted by: prc_fan1

Technically Khosla has already won the case, by proving that Priya's signature on the documents were authentic. And Shravan provided no counter-argument whatsoever. So exactly on what basis is Shravan even proceeding? And please remind me why did the judge allow the case to proceed?😆

The only thing that can save this case is Khosla's confession that he's lying. And the thing is we're not even sure if he's lying or telling the truth.

From the olvs...it looks like he is going to try to show that Khosla is lying. Let's just wait and watch. Waise Indian tv shows mein logic idhar udhar chup jati hai...I just hope this show is a bit different.

Quote

Samridhi

@BinKuchKahe.

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#156

The point is Shravan did nothing but smirk & look confident in both hearings. Yes the judge gave him time, but on what basis? Just to verify the details by the opposing party? Nehh judges hardly do that unless you have some substance to your case. And Shravan had no substantive material whatsoever.

I wouldn't have cribbed so much if the CVs didn't focus so much on the technical aspect of this track.. but they are. And to see them do it this way without any logic is annoying. I don't expect total legal decorum but just basic logical points that's it.

Quote

Samridhi

@BinKuchKahe.

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#157

Yes true lets just wait & watch!

Quote

Sanika

@Legilimens

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 9 years ago

#158

Sammy soyi nai?

Also go read my os. Pasan nai aaye tou batana,please :p

Edited by Sanika. - 9 years ago

Quote

Puja Bagchi

@puba

Dazzler

Posted: 9 years ago

#159

Originally posted by: prc_fan1

The point is Shravan did nothing but smirk & look confident in both hearings. Yes the judge gave him time, but on what basis? Just to verify the details by the opposing party? Nehh judges hardly do that unless you have some substance to your case. And Shravan had no substantive material whatsoever.
I wouldn't have cribbed so much if the CVs didn't focus so much on the technical aspect of this track.. but they are. And to see them do it this way without any logic is annoying. I don't expect total legal decorum but just basic logical points that's it.

I mean I agree to your points. It was quite disheartening to see that Shravan had no counter argument to offer on the 2nd hearing. However, I do hope that the writers are able to make up for some of the loopholes in the future!