cant accept ! - Page 3

I love this serial...its amazing...the way they are depicting Krishna as a human..because he was human n he was emotional bound by peoples love..i love it...n also i think Balram raising his voice infront of Krishna is fine elder brothers do that..lakshman couldnt do that because he was younger than Ram..this serial is one of the best.

Originally posted by: _Vrish_

But DBSK is made by the same people as JSK!

yeah .. PH is same i guess director is different ...

Originally posted by: _Vrish_

But DBSK is made by the same people as JSK! As for Sagar Arts, remember the Swarna-Kamal adventures, as well as the adventure of K-L & Hanuman after they're done singing the entire Ramayan to Rama? I think that the way they've split it, Sagar Arts seems to handle all Satya Yuga & Treta Yuga stories, and Sagar Pictures Dwapar Yuga stories.

I agree w/ you on some of the actors. Vishal seems to be batting alone - no real support from the rest of the cast, except Gauri and to an extent, Hemant.

Originally posted by: _Vrish_

Somebody else please do today's update - I'll do tonight's.

But continuing on the unacceptable aspect of the serial - the latest to be vilified is Satrajit & Rukmini. Last night, Rukmini was given a thali by Revathy, but while she was holding it, she tripped & fell. Even Revathy didn't consider it an apshakun, but Rukmini did. Later, when she was alone w/ Krishna and very concerned, Krishna asked her whether she'd be more @ ease if he were to assure her that there was nothing to worry about. Rukmini apologized but said no.

W*F? They made Rukmini to Krishna what Mandodari was to Ravan. 😡 When Uttara was threatened by Ashwatthama's Brahmashira, the Pandavas had a lot more to be worried about, but they had full faith in Krishna, and didn't worry about her. Here, Revathy has no concerns b'cos she has full faith in Balarama & Krishna, but Rukmini doesn't seem to. 🤔 I know that Rukmini was nowhere compared to Sita, but still, this sort of lack of faith in her hubby when her hubby is Krishna was just inexplicable.

Last night, they introduced Satrajit - the lead actor in the Syamantaka gem chapter. In the original story, Krishna wasn't interested in the gem, but in last night's episode, they had him ask Satrajit for the gem, and Satrajit refuse and finally run away. Later, Balarama upbraided Krishna for exhibiting greed after something that's been granted to someone else by Surya-dev, and Krishna questioned whether Satyaki deserves it. I too found Krishna's conduct pretty distasteful, given that in the original story, even after Satadhandva was killed and Krishna met Akrura, who had the jewel, he allowed Akrura to keep it.

The other thing I didn't like is that so far, the actual theif who incriminated Raman seemed to be forgotten, so no justice really for Ramaiya.

I'll comment more on the episode once the update is up.

Hey guys how're u... m struggling wth my net probm, cant tell u hoiw eager I'm to talk wth all u ppl!!

[
Krishna every time looked helpless...






Let me put it this way. When a saint/God is being made, it is only the posterity that looks at the personality as a God/saint. In their Age *in this context Krishan's time), there are mixed reactions. For example Shirdi Sai baba. He did not have many followers when he was alive but now the vastness of the temple in shirdi is itself a tell tale.

Or, evenpresent day examples like the art of living Guru. Ppl. who follow him consider him God but some others could look at him with a lot suspicion. Dwarakadeesh makers are bringing out this aspect of Dwaraka yuga very sincerely. This is unique becoz this is the first ever time this has been attempted. Risk-taking should be appreciated. Attemting run in the mill stuff is extremely easy like what other shows especially in the 8 pm slot are doing.

Yes, the actors performance can improve. Since the set is erected is erected in some remote part of Baroda, may be be due to difficulty in accessibility they are not able to get good actors. Shishupal, and the new entry Satrajit is not even remotely appealing at all. 😡Satrajit is the future father-in-law of Krishna. They surely should have got a better actor for this role.

Now, to the million dollar question: In just 1-2 weeks the character Satyabhama would step in. Just hope (though I know that 99% my hope will be squashed😭), I hust HOPE that they get someone commanding/experienced and yet subtle for the role of Satyabhama.

Satybhama is a much more multi-faceted and intriguing character than Rukmini. Hence any actress who has played a strong author backed role should be the best choice. This is because, in comparison to Rukmini (who is still tame as a character), Satyabhama is more human😊 It is told that Satybhama is bhuma devi and thus is multi faceted: warrior; loves her husband; challenges him and openly expresses that she needs his attention etc.

By the way, in the promo the girl who was shown with Krishna was Rukmini or Satybhama. As, the girl in the promo was surely not Priya. So, is the same girl going to play Satybhama. Any guesses?

LJR

Originally posted by: _Vrish_

LJR

Just as there were major differences in the character profiles of Rama & Krishna, it has to be conceded that there were similarly major differences b/w Sita & Rukmini. Just b'cos Rukmini was Lakshmi's incarnation doesn't imply that her character was the same as Sita's. Granted, circumstances made them different, but that's the point - they were different. What might have happened had Rukmini been the queen of Ayodhya or Sita been the one of the royal women of Dwarka is something that can only be speculated.

Which promo are you talking about? The latest promo that they have running for tonight's show is Satrajit accusing Krishna of stealing his jewel & killing his brother Prasenjit. No Satyabhama was shown, and I doubt they'll show her until Krishna is vindicated, and Satrajit decides to offer her to Krishna.

Originally posted by: _Vrish_

LJR

Which promo are you talking about? The latest promo that they have running for tonight's show is Satrajit accusing Krishna of stealing his jewel & killing his brother Prasenjit. No Satyabhama was shown, and I doubt they'll show her until Krishna is vindicated, and Satrajit decides to offer her to Krishna.

Vrish,
Before the serial started, the promos that were on did not have priya in them they had Vishal along with some other person. Was this actress playing satybhama or was she used in lieu of Rukmini just for the promo?