*~DABH-Frustrations Thread~*#2 *DT Note P 66/70* - Page 52

Originally posted by: --veena--

@ Mugl-e-azam sorry yaar. . spoiler turns out to be false... its time for celebration... its just my frustration on hearing sbs vo. ... surya saved from cvs. ..

Sahi me?? 😊 😊 [:D/] .. Thanks yaar warna Mai b sooraj k mafik insane ho jaati 😉

Originally posted by: Mugl-e-azam

Sahi me?? 😊 😊 [:D/] .. Thanks yaar warna Mai b sooraj k mafik insane ho jaati 😉

it's true... spoilers and segments hamare dil aur dimaag ko karaab kardiya. ... Now such a relief after seeing the actual episode...

Originally posted by: --veena--

it's true... spoilers and segments hamare dil aur dimaag ko karaab kardiya. ... Now such a relief after seeing the actual episode...

Some people using vulgar words. Harrassing actors and their appearances. What is going on in the forum? Very unhappy.

My frustrations in the form of a poem

Thank you friends for liking my post. I want to watch dabh with a smile. I don't want to cry. We all want that I know. CVs please listen. Make dabh to be loved by all as it has been for the last 4 years.

Enough is enough. Mod, I'm no one to suggest this. But it's my honorable opinion. I think First we should close all AT and DTs about actors and actress.that's only causes all problems.
There are character AT. Then what is the need to open Actor AT?
Again please suggest tthem to post like character successfully executed by actor than posting like he/she is king/queen of expressions.
A show is about characters not actors. we can support or hate characters, will this forum allow that unbiased criticism about actor/actress and their life.
If we can't, we shouldn't appreciate celebrity AT at a daily soap forum.

i got your point susee,

i think you are saying why if an actor/character should be allowed to be praised when they are not allowed to be criticised...

I agree, no point appreciating if no criticism is allowed...

Actually Actors AT exist so that you can post offscreen pics of the actors with their family, friends or whoever...otherwise their personal stuff will get bashed in the main threads...secondly it was created mainly to appreciate or discuss about them...thirdly when their info/segments arent shared in the main thread, AT will do the work...

No Akka.I Didn't mean anything wrong about AT.But you see if I post something about Sandy, then people labeling me as DS basher. not only in this forum, in YHM forum also many people supported Ishita due to that character portrayed by DT.Personally I felt it all happening because people toggling their views on differences between character and actor. I'm sorry if this POV hurts you. see, some people wants Anas to act as Suraj. so they are ready to accept anything like suraj becomes spy, police to ensure his part in upcoming episodes. they will forget Suraj is a simple self made man. obsession on Actor/Actress makes us to change script, wants to justify our fav as perfect, wants us to behave like they are accusing actors even though people questioned characterization. in my POV, obsession on Actor shouldn't affect show/masterpiece health and wealth.

do you know Akka?i am very much annoyed with this forum double standards. sometimes I feel to join in Anas AT. but I resisted myself to part on that AT. because it'll give a chance to poke me like I'm supporting Suraj and hating Sandy because of being Anas fan.

of course, Ramayana have more sense here also.Mata Sita was pure but Lord Ram didn't want give any chance to question about his Dharma. same here, even though you're a good judge, people will question your honesty just because of you're fan of respective Actor. they'll point you as Actor supporter. Sometimes we have to uphold our morals by leaving our Rights.AT maynot cause problems but I said it shouldn't give a chance to doubt about forum's neutrality.