Actress and Character Ridhimma - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

1.6k

Users

9

Likes

20

Frequent Posters

-Anku- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 15 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Sue101

hey ankita..i just love all your comments..you talk very sensible..making sure not to hurt anyone😃 good job girl..the forum should be happy to get such new members😃

Hey sue thank you so much😊 .......if I have read all your posts ....I know one thing for sure I have never seen you hurting anyone else aswell and you are one of the most sweetest person on this forum!
DarlingSarun thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#12
Sue awesom post . AR is become our part of life. Well said all 3 actress played their role for short term and gave their 100%. But Arman was always one and only KSG.
But whenever there was change of actress there was change in the role of Ridhima too. Totally different from the previous one.I dont know why? This makes me think Is this same ridz I used to watch.
Why CVS are playing with the character Ridhima. Always experimenting her with a new change. This I didn't like it.
Sue101 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: sherleve

Sue awesom post . AR is become our part of life. Well said all 3 actress played their role for short term and gave their 100%. But Arman was always one and only KSG.

But whenever there was change of actress there was change in the role of Ridhima too. Totally different from the previous one.I dont know why? This makes me think Is this same ridz I used to watch.
Why CVS are playing with the character Ridhima. Always experimenting her with a new change. This I didn't like it.

very boldly written the truth hun👏👏👏
Sue101 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#14
dua_44ever thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#15
Amazing topic dear 👏 I completely agree with each and every word. Specially this line:

I want to say here that the attachment we as fanzz have to the character Ridhimma will be much more than the actressess who potrayed the role for a very shortime.

But at the same time I want to modify this line a little bit for my view.

I want to say here that the attachment we as fanzz have to the character Ridhimma SHOULD be much more than the actressess who potrayed the role for a very shortime.

For the actresses's sake, that is! All three of them have never had anything against each other, never spoke ill of each other but actually had words of praise for the other two. All the three tried to do the same thing Do justice to the complex role of Ridhimma and they all have been very successful in their own way. They all have given perfect shades to the character (as rightly ur topic title is).
Sometimes I feel that, and don't get me wrong here, if we didn't have 3 Ridhimmas what would have happened? But we can't answer that question. The fact is that we had 3 Ridzs and we should accept it. (accepting the change of actress and not the character...) All three remarkable actresses gave their very own special and perfect touch.
Shilpa, Sukku and Jenny COMBINED gave Ridhimma what a lot of shows don't get in their protagonist from one actor.
We should all be thanking them.

I for one love all three..Shilpa, Sukku and Jenny ...b/c without them we won't have Ridhimma. Just like without KSG we won't and will never have Armaan, without Mayank we will never have Rahul, without Drashti we won't have Muskaan, Sunaina, Pankit, Ayaz...etc...

Padma had been changed twice....and they both have given the role their own special touch...

What I am trying to say is that in the end it's the characters. That's what all the actors thrive towards..to be known and be famous by a special character and secondly as the actor who played that character. Example....there are a lot of people for whom Smriti Irani isn't Smriti Irani...She is Tulsi....Similarly...Juhi Parmar for a lot of people is Kumkum...that's how she is known....

It's ALWAYS about the character...

I am sorry if I went off topic!

BTW..Sue...I loved your analogy of B'Wood actors who " get so much so into the character do not take two movies at the same time. They spend all their time for a movie to become the character itself. " 😉


Sorry for the long and boring post! 😆 I got carried away...
Sue101 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: dua_44ever

Amazing topic dear 👏 I completely agree with each and every word. Specially this line:

I want to say here that the attachment we as fanzz have to the character Ridhimma will be much more than the actressess who potrayed the role for a very shortime.

But at the same time I want to modify this line a little bit for my view.

I want to say here that the attachment we as fanzz have to the character Ridhimma SHOULD be much more than the actressess who potrayed the role for a very shortime.

For the actresses's sake, that is! All three of them have never had anything against each other, never spoke ill of each other but actually had words of praise for the other two. All the three tried to do the same thing Do justice to the complex role of Ridhimma and they all have been very successful in their own way. They all have given perfect shades to the character (as rightly ur topic title is).
Sometimes I feel that, and don't get me wrong here, if we didn't have 3 Ridhimmas what would have happened? But we can't answer that question. The fact is that we had 3 Ridzs and we should accept it. (accepting the change of actress and not the character...) All three remarkable actresses gave their very own special and perfect touch.
Shilpa, Sukku and Jenny COMBINED gave Ridhimma what a lot of shows don't get in their protagonist from one actor.
We should all be thanking them.

I for one love all three..Shilpa, Sukku and Jenny ...b/c without them we won't have Ridhimma. Just like without KSG we won't and will never have Armaan, without Mayank we will never have Rahul, without Drashti we won't have Muskaan, Sunaina, Pankit, Ayaz...etc...

Padma had been changed twice....and they both have given the role their own special touch...

What I am trying to say is that in the end it's the characters. That's what all the actors thrive towards..to be known and be famous by a special character and secondly as the actor who played that character. Example....there are a lot of people for whom Smriti Irani isn't Smriti Irani...She is Tulsi....Similarly...Juhi Parmar for a lot of people is Kumkum...that's how she is known....

It's ALWAYS about the character...

I am sorry if I went off topic!

BTW..Sue...I loved your analogy of B'Wood actors who " get so much so into the character do not take two movies at the same time. They spend all their time for a movie to become the character itself. " 😉


Sorry for the long and boring post! 😆 I got carried away...

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH RABZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ what a beautiful comment hun...my topic is priveleged nowwwwwwwwww wow..your comment itselof deserves to be a great topic by itself👏

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".