Why at is closed - Page 12

Originally posted by: loveangel94

I have already asked her why she closed at without giving warning and proper explanation.

I have also asked global moderator to look in.

My post point is to see other forum members opinion about ongoing strict moral policing.

I don't care what mod think or not.

I will write my honest opinion.

I m doing this because I hope in future it block other unreasonable moral policing and punishment without reason.

Having authority means also having responsibility to be answerable.

Originally posted by: .Avengers.

Man 15 page crossed😆

I think it's not about this forum, every forum is getting such hitler like mods these days ki they close topics or post a note for no reason at all. The 9:30 Sony show forum was always so calm and now mods there drop by on epi analysis post that we mocked and all. Mods lock CCs and ATs and give faltoo ka explanation which has no head or tail. K AT was locked back during IB time too but now we got a new forum so what's up now? Should not those stalkers get reported too who have no other work except stalking and reporting useless posts? And why can't mod keep an eye rather than straight up lock, they are not to be found when we actually need them for eg sticking post or stop fanfights🥱

Guys there is no use discussing it now I have written to the Mod let her respond, I don't think it's about yesterday because you are allowed to discuss IB in context to the character whose AT it is, I had asked her earlier about Rumya AT n she said we could discuss IB

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Guys there is no use discussing it now I have written to the Mod let her respond, I don't think it's about yesterday because you are allowed to discuss IB in context to the character whose AT it is, I had asked her earlier about Rumya AT n she said we could discuss IB

I think she confused our dislikeaboutGauri's character n RiKara story to bashing let's wait for her reply n will try to put our point to her

Also to be frank I don't think it's about reporting this time as DBO forum is pretty homogeneous and no one from outside the forum would take the pain to scan and report the AT

Originally posted by: KunalJaiS

Kunal R8 Now 🤣

saki 🤣🤣

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Guys there is no use discussing it now I have written to the Mod let her respond, I don't think it's about yesterday because you are allowed to discuss IB in context to the character whose AT it is, I had asked her earlier about Rumya AT n she said we could discuss IB

I think she confused our dislike about Gauri's character n RiKara story to bashing let's wait for her reply n will try to put our point to her

Also to be frank I don't think it's about reporting this time as DBO forum is pretty homogeneous and no one from outside the forum would take the pain to scan and report the AT

preet we never discussed about IB actors in K AT.

Ok people Shreya (MOD) just responded to me, she has been kind to reduce the make it a 24 hours warning (instead of 72 hours warning that it originally was), rest I am quoting her response here

"I'm sorry I cannot provide specific posts as there are across too many ATs to collect them all and post them here.


But here's what I can tell you. I have some specific examples of what you can't do just so you know for the future from many ATs:

1.No more than a page at a time on discussing other characters.
2.No discussion on IB forum or the main forum topics. There were a few instances where some member said, "oh did you see that post in IB what a joke" and then the discussion revolved around that. You can mention your own posts like "go see my thread in IB forum" or "did you see my reply in xyz thread", but don't discuss other people's posts and especially not about how you'll report them or bash them. This latter part didn't happen specifically in the Kunal AT, but it's still good to know.
3.Don't bash other characters or actors. The former happened several times like "Gauri is such a joker" or "that ACP didn't bother even searching for Saumya". These are just examples. The second one didn't happen in the Kunal AT, but it was just an example.
4.Don't respond to instigating posts. I had to remove a few comments in a few ATs where someone posted something instigatory and a few people replied to it. Since it wasn't like bashing or anything I didn't say anything, but just keep this in mind.

Often times you or someone else might post something that's fine and then other people will start taking it out of context. For example say abhiya_12 posts "today Gauri was so annoying". Now that by itself is fine. But then a few more people join the conversation and suddenly it becomes a Gauri bashing session and in the end I look at the full context around a post. So I'll look at what abhiya_12 posted and then what everyone else posted and while abhiya_12 didn't mean for it to go against the rules because it did that constitutes a warning. Then depending on the number of people involved it might be individual warnings or an AT warning."

I think we shall stop this discussion here and be more attentive henceforth

Originally posted by: Priya.

@ bold - Preet I don't know about the reporting part but Kunal AT is very much stalked by our old friends.There is evidence left elsewhere😉😆

And yes the fictional character Gauri is criticised as many people are extremely disappointed in the way the cv's have conceived and developed ( aspects of) her character. The question is aren't we allowed to express what we feel or not? Is every sort of civil criticism equal bashing?

Pri lets not get there our old friends are more loyal than the AT members, AT members ne AT chhod di but friends ne nhi

About the second part, I just quoted the reply from the mod, lets follow that and try to be attentive

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Ok people Shreya (MOD) just responded to me, she has been kind to reduce the make it a 24 hours warning (instead of 72 hours warning that it originally was), rest I am quoting her response here

"I'm sorry I cannot provide specific posts as there are across too many ATs to collect them all and post them here.


But here's what I can tell you. I have some specific examples of what you can't do just so you know for the future from many ATs:

1.No more than a page at a time on discussing other characters.
2.No discussion on IB forum or the main forum topics. There were a few instances where some member said, "oh did you see that post in IB what a joke" and then the discussion revolved around that. You can mention your own posts like "go see my thread in IB forum" or "did you see my reply in xyz thread", but don't discuss other people's posts and especially not about how you'll report them or bash them. This latter part didn't happen specifically in the Kunal AT, but it's still good to know.
3.Don't bash other characters or actors. The former happened several times like "Gauri is such a joker" or "that ACP didn't bother even searching for Saumya". These are just examples. The second one didn't happen in the Kunal AT, but it was just an example.
4.Don't respond to instigating posts. I had to remove a few comments in a few ATs where someone posted something instigatory and a few people replied to it. Since it wasn't like bashing or anything I didn't say anything, but just keep this in mind.

Often times you or someone else might post something that's fine and then other people will start taking it out of context. For example say abhiya_12 posts "today Gauri was so annoying". Now that by itself is fine. But then a few more people join the conversation and suddenly it becomes a Gauri bashing session and in the end I look at the full context around a post. So I'll look at what abhiya_12 posted and then what everyone else posted and while abhiya_12 didn't mean for it to go against the rules because it did that constitutes a warning. Then depending on the number of people involved it might be individual warnings or an AT warning."

I think we shall stop this discussion here and be more attentive henceforth