Does Veer Love Shera at all?? - Page 3

is sawal ka jawab to veer ke paas bhi nahin hai, sirf sagars hi jante hain

but laks he is taking shramiks share only which they give to aryavrath in shape of lagaan...jamindaar case was absolutely different ...as far as majboori is concern....shera had no right to steal or loot their hard earned money....dakoo ka kisi ki kamai par haque nahi hota

Originally posted by: sonur15

but laks he is taking shramiks share only which they give to aryavrath in shape of lagaan...jamindaar case was absolutely different ...as far as majboori is concern....shera had no right to steal or loot their hard earned money....dakoo ka kisi ki kamai par haque nahi hota

Originally posted by: lakshmim_84

well, i would like to quote veer's words itself... "chori karne ke liye koi majburi nahi hoti". n telling that the money they r stealing is their own lagan is just trying to catch a straw when u r drowning... it is not right....

during gurukul days, when a jamindaar's daughter's wedding was going on... veer stopped shera from stealing their money.......... even that jamindaar was rich..but he felt, it is wrong to steal.......

its the same case now, aryavrats have brought money with them for the yatra, then how cld veer steal them. what happened to his morals....

n also, from y'day episode, i didn't feel that veer loves shera, he is just using her..... he was thinking on how to steal, n he sees shera... n its like "yes, i have got a way"......

I agree with u yaar.Yesterday i was shocked to see veer telling shera o steal aryavrats money. I feel he was wrong here.Now dharam will say tumne humein harane ke liye hamare paiso se hatyaar kharide?Veer shdn't hv done this. 😭

no i dont agree with u laks what about veer's trust dharam has also break veer's trust ...what veer has done....usne toh sia ko bachaya hi tha...veer took that decision of stealing because he lost hope but what one thing irritated dharam to that xtend which made him say something like that n front of sia... im sorry but these aryavraths behaves like a britisher...they hold the powerful political positions... take lagan from shramiks...freedom is not meant for them.... their children cant play in park..

Originally posted by: sonur15

no i dont agree with u laks what about veer's trust dharam has also break veer's trust ...what veer has done....usne toh sia ko bachaya hi tha...veer took that decision of stealing because he lost hope but what one thing irritated dharam to that xtend which made him say something like that n front of sia... im sorry but these aryavraths behaves like a britisher...they hold the powerful political positions... take lagan from shramiks...freedom is not meant for them.... their children cant play in park..

as far as sia is concern who gave her right to speak in their internal matter...she is a rajkumari she was supposed to have some grace...why she is behaving like a chugalkhor....agar dharam usko chance dega tabhi toh kuch bolegi

but dharam ne kya galat kaha?He only said aryavrats provide shramiks food and shelter.Kya yeh galat hai?He only said the truth,what was the need for veer to feel hurt?Dharam ne jo kaha,bilkul sahi kaha.

Originally posted by: sonur15

no i dont agree with u laks what about veer's trust dharam has also break veer's trust ...what veer has done....usne toh sia ko bachaya hi tha...veer took that decision of stealing because he lost hope but what one thing irritated dharam to that xtend which made him say something like that n front of sia... im sorry but these aryavraths behaves like a britisher...they hold the powerful political positions... take lagan from shramiks...freedom is not meant for them.... their children cant play in park..

as far as sia is concern who gave her right to speak in their internal matter...she is a rajkumari she was supposed to have some grace...why she is behaving like a chugalkhor....agar dharam usko chance dega tabhi toh kuch bolegi

oh really so according to u he was right....chalo leave it subha i dont think there is any use of discussing it further ...then u must be supporting sia also ...i think veer shouldnt have asked for azadi he should live like poor sharmik...dhoop mai non stop kaam karna chahiye...mandir mai entry ke liye dharam ko bohot thanks karni chahiye.....................wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...veer is wrong from the begining i think...

leave it laks ....u are not getting my point uski honewali gharwali jisko woh kabhi yaad bhi nahi karta tha his father and family doesnt know about his gharwali.......yes dharam was right....aur ho bhi kyo na woh toh kabhi galat hota hi nahi....first it was veer now there is sia...dharam always fellow someone adviced

Originally posted by: sonur15

oh really so according tou he was right....chalo leave it subha i dont think there is any use of discussing it further ...then u must be supporting sia also ...i think veer shouldnt have asked for azadi he should live like poor sharmik...dhoop mai non stop kaam karna chahiye...mandir mai entry ke liye dharam ko bohot thanks karni chahiye.....................wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...veer is wrong from the begining i think...

excuse me,u misunderstood me.yeh log dhoop mein free mein kaam nahi karte hain,inhe aryavrats isliye to money,food,shelter dete hain.Dharam stopped the food supply to them b'coz they didn't turn up to work.That was their punishment.
Raha sawaal mandir mein entry ka,agar dharam permission nahi deta to kya yeh log ghoos pate?Dharam even went against the rajya sabha for this b'coz he realized shramiks hv full right to go to temple.U too like shramiks forgot all those things.
Sorry if it hurt u.