Originally posted by: .Reshama.
yes.. i thought they reside also there..but i knew they also reside in our harts..the atmaa is gods gift...
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 04 Aug 2025 EDT
UPMA&ICECREAM 4.8
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai August 5, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Jhanak Written Update And Episode Discussion thread No "123"
BALH Naya Season EDT Week # 8: Aug 4 - Aug 8
National Awards mockery: Legendary Urvashi slams awarding SRK on Pg 2
Anupamaa 04 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Abhira’s infertility issue
SATYAMEV JAYATE 5.8
Member topic: What do you do on weekends?
Are you interested to watch War 2 in cinemas?10 days to go!
Dhanush And Mrunal Thakur Reportedly Dating
Saiyaara Joins 300 Crore Club Celebration Thread
Anupamaa 05 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Originally posted by: .Reshama.
yes.. i thought they reside also there..but i knew they also reside in our harts..the atmaa is gods gift...
Originally posted by: wildcat1994
yes, v can discuss abt SHIVLINGAMS and NUCLEAR reactors...but y not start a new thread which is about the connection between SCIENCE & ANCIENT MYTHS/MYTHOLOGIES??? wassay??
Hello... My name's rinal and i'm new to this forum... Just registered myself some days back... And i have a mighty big ball of doubts rolling in my head..
forgive me for i'm extremely confused & may have trouble explaining my doubt clearly... But here it is anyway...
So sati's mother prasuti had narrated the story of jallandhar-vrinda-shaligram during the tulsi vivah sequence... I surmise that for someone who knows something even minutely about jallandhar, it is imperative that the person must also be aware of jallandhar's identity... That of being a 'shivansh'... And prasuti seemed oblivious to it... Infact i've noticed that despite being part of the Trinity, sati & parvati's families knew nothing about shiva... Even in parvati's era, her mother was not at all happy imitally about her attraction towards shiva.. Even parvati's nani makes a point that marriage should always be solemnized between people belonging to the same 'kul'/cultural bg... She also sent an aide of hers to kailash alongwith the people who went for the Tilak ceremony to find out everything about shiva & the other inhabitants of kailash... I mean, how could they be so ignorant? How could they not know anything about shiva?😕
Originally posted by: rinal.lataxi
Hello... My name's rinal and i'm new to this forum... Just registered myself some days back... And i have a mighty big ball of doubts rolling in my head..
forgive me for i'm extremely confused & may have trouble explaining my doubt clearly... But here it is anyway...
So sati's mother prasuti had narrated the story of jallandhar-vrinda-shaligram during the tulsi vivah sequence... I surmise that for someone who knows something even minutely about jallandhar, it is imperative that the person must also be aware of jallandhar's identity... That of being a 'shivansh'... And prasuti seemed oblivious to it... Infact i've noticed that despite being part of the Trinity, sati & parvati's families knew nothing about shiva... Even in parvati's era, her mother was not at all happy imitally about her attraction towards shiva.. Even parvati's nani makes a point that marriage should always be solemnized between people belonging to the same 'kul'/cultural bg... She also sent an aide of hers to kailash alongwith the people who went for the Tilak ceremony to find out everything about shiva & the other inhabitants of kailash... I mean, how could they be so ignorant? How could they not know anything about shiva?😕
Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt
Ok Prasuti narrating the story was a blooper, so leave that.Daksha was already against SHiva... as he had beheaded one of his father Brahma's heads. And another reason was that SHiva as a son-in-law didn't pay him proper respects. Though the real reason was that if Shiva had bowed down to Daksha, Daksha wouold have never been freed from the birth-and-death cycle, because it is a great offence to make a god pray to you.TheParvati's mom and Nani not liking SHiva is made up. In the real story both Menavati and hImavan are great Shivabhaktas and regularly have darshan of Lord SHiva.Hope this clears your doubt. Could you answer mine?
Since on Friday, they showed the return of Nahusha, it brought up another question. Yeah, I know this serial makes things up, but just to recap...
Did the Tridevs have any involvement in the selection of Nahusha? As per the Mahabharata account (by Shalya to the Pandavas), who was it who selected him to be Devaraj? From what I recall, Indra abdicated the throne after the treacherous killing of Vritra and disappeared, even w/o Sachi. The devas were at a loss but needed a ruler, and ultimately approached Nahusha. Initially, Nahusha was reluctant, but accepted the throne. Like many others both b4 and after him, he started well, but after a while, his stature went to his head. The turning point started after he started stalking Sachi.Here, they showed Atri/Kashyap propose his name, and he conveniently happened to be there. Also, in the original, wasn't he already a king of Pratishthana? Had he already died, or did he become devraj in his human form? Also, while it's claimed that Indra is a title for devraj, Indra, as in Aditi-nandan, regained the throne after Nahusha's fall. Also, was Nahusha responsible for the rains when Indra was absent?
Originally posted by: Surya_krsnbhakt
Good idea.OK I have another BIG doubt. SO we know that Swargalok and Patallok are not on earth. So naturally, even all the fighting should take place outside earth, no?BUt (not only in the show) whenever the gods and demons fight, it is always on earth. Because, neither in Swargalok, nor in Patallok, there are clouds or sun or moon. Even in Puranas, the fight is always on earth. WHy so?