i dont not think Parvati was shown like a Villian-and i do not think the episode was even 1/4th of how bad the Kaali episode was...
Parvatis arguments were logical and even her anger was justified
Infact through out the argument Parvati did have an upper hand
What did Vinayak do so bad that he deserved a beheading?
Why all the DEvtas and Ganas ganged up against a little boy just following his mothers orders?
Why Mahadev who otherwise leaves her alone for days together couldnt wait for just sometime to meet her?
If Prajyapati Daksha could be brought back to life,why not Vinayak?
Dakshas and Vinyaks crimes were of two diffrent levels,Dakshas being worse-so if Daksha could be brought alive why not Vinayak
She first nicely asked Mahadev-mostly she immidiately gets angry
here she asks Mahadev nicely,then she demands it,and when Mahadev doesnt listen to her demand only then she becomes Adi Shakti and begins to destroy everything
Parvatis anger and her vengance was justified-i do not think she looked bad!
The Makers actually gave us two arguments-One Mahadevs and One Parvatis both arguments in thier own way were right
I though Parvati was right and Mahadev was the one who looked like a villian!
but i agree with Vrish,in an attempt to justify Vinayaks beheading they did manage to make the viewers confused
Infuriating was the precap🤣-no comments on that😊