Did we forget? - Page 2

Originally posted by: shruti.nil

okey...

now where is this topic going???😆

i just meant to say that we should remember this show is a mythological and not expect the romance etc to be put in the forefront as compared to the Sati phase!and hence expect the represnetation to be made that way itself and not like a film!

im not comparing either stage!

oh God...do i have to be mistunderstood..

never mind!

Arrey I was joking re...I just thought you needed a good dose of laugh...I will remove that from my post..or the DTs will be kicked out of this forum😆

wow.. Dkdm seems like a melting pot of all tv soaps and mythos.. yes i agree that the transition from a romantic show to a mytho has been liked as well as hated by some.. but as rightly mentioned, this was bound to happen at some stage.. those who watched it purely for a romantic angle wud obviously not like it now..

What i seriously cant understand is why cant we leave it to the fact that both the phases have had their merits.. As a new show if DKDM did use the romantic platform, there isnt anything wrong with it.. It did give them a lot of space to develop characters..tho predominantly romantic, narad, nandi, vishnuji, dakhsha and a lot of other characters got much larger screen presence. The show got a strong foothold afterwhich it cud turn to the myhto aspect.. Similarly, beyond a certain point, stretching a romantic line can also be monotonous and a mytho stories ARE A NECESSITY here.. honestly i dint know half the sub-stories they are showing now.. i enjoyed the sati phase for a different reason and like this one for another.. comparing actors is simply baseless imho..

one complain i do have about the current way of things is the lack of proper oranization with stories attaching themselves without a flow.. also most of the shooting taking lace inside the studio with animated graphics thrown in later is a bit boring

Originally posted by: -Srushti-

Interesting topic...And I loved everybody's viewpoint on what they find different between the phases...
Ah well...two pence from my side...Sati phase and Parvati phase are totally different...from a complete layman point of view...ie knowing nothing about the scriptures...I would say that Sati phase was a teenager's love story...and it was given a depth and a flair because we all knew that it was going to die a very tragic death...where as Parvati phase is a matured love story...it is more about responsibilities, growing up together...Sati phase was never given that touch as we knew the end from the beginning..and nobody would have believed it otherwise...
Parvati phase..the most visible drawback has been the patchy editing ...and a kind of messed up stage...and also the lack of strong co-actors...the only strong actors are the ones which were also there during Sati phase...To be frank...Daksh was the peripheral of all...when he stood up..everything else dimmed...
Right now we have like dozen cameos..but not a solid actor..the only other role which is predominant is a weak character...Indra...even the Asurs have turned into something called Comic relief😆
That grandeur is missing...we loved Sati and Shiva against the total evil that was Daksha...

In this phase the couple is being hood winked by hopeless devtas and which is very pathetic actually...
Dont know if I make sense...I dont think I do😕😆 Ah well...i can say I am consistent😆

Srushti, well said, about the characters & editing. Who will be next after Tarkasur is the haunting Q😆

Originally posted by: shruti.nil

@meenaxi-they had a spiritual significance..maybe yes...but many of the sequences were cooked up..like the constant attacks,Sati fainting and all those things,Dakshas hatred...

the D and D thread was more acive then beacuse the show was still knew,and infact we have discussed almost everytopic there thats why it isnt that active

it was made a bit more filmy and romantisised!

also the focus during Satis time was romance and love

i think we have seen a larger number of stories in Parvatis phase!and yes they have put forward some concepts beautifully-like Ardhanaeeshwar,Parvatis Tapasya etc etc

regarding mess up-both of the phases have had thier own types of goof ups!

shruti, Sati fainting & being attacked constantly are very minor incidents. I am talking about the real significant aspects like Mahakal, Ardhnarishwar etc.

about actors-the Satis phase had space for them, because almost the entire Sati phase developed around them-hence we had a larger number of characters there who were well develeoped beacuse they had the time

sheehs thats my Ramayan

during sati's time they didn't blindly glorified mahadeva which are they doing in parvati's time..rather they sometimes glorified sati too but that charm is missing in parvati..when parvati is complete adi shakti form they made her only a weak woman..and everyone is more powerful than her..yes she took durga and mahakali form but alltimes was directed by mahadev as if ..and romance is not our illusion there vivid descriptions of their romance in puranas..they are omitting this nowadays...
and also there are no vishnu nowadays who in sati's phase and early parvati's phase was more active..brahma is nowadays more like a smiling witness of all these happening without dialogue ..no activity for lakshmi,saraswati,chandrama etc..and also indra's own stories are missing..and i also miss sati's sister who helped parvati to get ready to meet mahadeva..i think now they also should show some of vishnu's avtar's story too...

*bang head band head*

Originally posted by: shruti.nil

*bang head band head*

okey done!

i finally give up

minaxi can i close this topic please?

hahaha Shruti getting all frayed...let it be na...We are having a healthy discussion...it might be a bit out of the main post...but still😆

@Srusthi its SO out the main post...