Vachan!!! - Page 3

Originally posted by: narangi_77

@Krishna

Yes probably...we have this Vindhya naresh putra dude...😆 All these poor chaps. What have they done to deserve this? They don't stand a chance in front of our Mahadev... 😆

All we can do is bide our time...bide our time...wait for all the 🤪 to pass.

Yes did you notice that he was named in this episode by mena, i mean in this episode they named him for the first time. the name was dandak.

hope he doesnt become some bali ka bakra 🤣. but i am sure he will make his entry in one or two weeks.

Krishna

Originally posted by: kkr531

Yes did you notice that he was named in this episode by mena, i mean in this episode they named him for the first time. the name was dandak.
hope he doesnt become some bali ka bakra 🤣. but i am sure he will make his entry in one or two weeks.

Krishna

Originally posted by: narangi_77

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 Of course he will!

And we have to put up with this predictable nonsense for how long I wonder?! 😕

I am amazed that they can't come up with ONE original (and not totally wack-job) idea!!! Now they are just copying themselves!!!! 😆

So only bright spot is mohit raina as shivji . i was expecting double bonanza with very good depiction of parvati but it seems we were expecting too much.

krishna

Don't think Shivji will take manav roop again for Parvathi..coz in Sati's case Daksh the father of the bride was against the marriage but in Parvathi's case its her mother who is against.. at some point Mena has to listen to her husbands wish.. I know its chauvinistic but in those days pati was considered parmeshwar so that way mena can't go against Himavan & His wishes..

Originally posted by: GoldenDew

Don't think Shivji will take manav roop again for Parvathi..coz in Sati's case Daksh the father of the bride was against the marriage but in Parvathi's case its her mother who is against.. at some point Mena has to listen to her husbands wish.. I know its chauvinistic but in those days pati was considered parmeshwar so that way mena can't go against Himavan & His wishes..

Originally posted by: narangi_77

Actually Shiva does take the form of a Brahmin to test Parvati...he says all sorts of horrible things about himself and Parvati refutes him ... that'll be fun to watch! Unlike in the case of Sati, there's actually some basis for such a track!

its not exactly manav roop its more like a visual illusion,

moreover let me make it clear Shiv and Parvati have never taken manav roops or human avatars.
they occasionally are born as humans only as anshavatars.

but CVs have distorted this truth so much that people really think that it may be possible. But its against shiv and parvati's nature to take human forms.
CVs should also understand that parvati's avatar is not like Rama or Krishna where they have to eventually leave the body to return.
its the permanent form of devishakti who till that point was formless, and till now exists in the form. in short parvati is the personification of supreme divine and not human avatar or aadishakti

these CV's have not done even the basic research.

regards
Krishna

I think Maina will choose Mahadev for her daughter once she realizes their love.

Originally posted by: narangi_77

It is not an "avatar" in the Vaishnavite sense for sure...

Shiva does indeed take the "form" of humans (he's not born as a human) for his various acts on earth. There's a story in the skanda purana of Shiva taking the form of a good looking beggar and Vishnu a the form of a beautiful maiden...to teach some rishis a lesson...just to mention one...

If you want to call that an illusion...sure...but I'm not sure why we shd object to "human form" / "manav-roop". No one is confusing these with the Rama/Krishna avatars...

i am not objecting to human form or manav roop. what i meant was

In the sati track shiv kept saying that pancha tatva shareer se bana sati mere yogya nahi ho sakthi etc

Here also they keep saying that manav roop me janmi aadi shakti ko manushya roopi maryadaonka paalan karna padega

this is a line similar to rama and krishna, as rama was human he had to follow all the human ideals and had to act like human.

even though parvati is born as human the human rules do not apply for her. i just wanted to convey that message,

regards
Krishna

Originally posted by: kkr531

i am not objecting to human form or manav roop. what i meant was

In the sati track shiv kept saying that pancha tatva shareer se bana sati mere yogya nahi ho sakthi etc
Here also they keep saying that manav roop me janmi aadi shakti ko manushya roopi maryadaonka paalan karna padega

this is a line similar to rama and krishna, as rama was human he had to follow all the human ideals and had to act like human.
even though parvati is born as human the human rules do not apply for her. i just wanted to convey that message,

regards
Krishna