When people were/are criticizing Hinduism for its caste system ,do you find the Hindus saying that go and read the Vedas and Upanishads it is not part of Hinduism. Did the Hindus say those who are practising it are not Hindus . I see terrorists killing in the name Islam and only thing I hear is that they are not muslims. Hindus accepted that there were/are shortcomings and trying to improve upon it. Are the muslims doing the same? People are going to judge any religion by its followers. Any religion is as good/bad as its followers. why don't you show the verses to the govt. of Saudi Arabia? How much freedom of religion is there ? Is there any educated muslim protesting?
Let me copy from my previous post about cast system in hindus:
Let me tell you some thing about the caste system .
The caste system was never the was it is now.
The very word 'caste' is not Indian.
It is of Portugese origin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste#Etymology_of_the_English_ word_caste
The related Indian word is "Varna" and "jati".
It was a social order based on one's occupation NOT BIRTH.
Over the time the system got corrupted (power corrupts)and
the higher order people like Brahmins manipulated it for their own
advantage and it became associated with one's BIRTH.
Even lord 'Gautam Buddha'who founded Buddhism believed in the varna system.
We have many instances in Indian history to show that one can change
one's varna.
Take the example of sage 'valmiki'.
He was of tribal orgin (which is of the lowest order in varna) but rose
to become a brahmin and wrote the 'Ramayana'.
Lord krishna was born into a yadav family(Lalu Prasad yadav rings a bell) which is considered to be among the backward classes today.
The social order or rather the division of society based on occupation
is not a new phenomenon .
Just a couple of centuries back.
There was the feudal system .
They had the feudal lords and the peasants in the whole Europe.
All did their respective duties and it was very much based on
one's birth.
A lord's son became a lord.
A peasant's son became a peasant.
None of the pre modern societies have been egalitarian in terms of belief or practice.
Discrimination by those who control power / economy has been a norm.
Only that in context of Indian society / hindism this was sought to be given a religious cover name of Casteism.
I don't remember people saying the division of society along the lines
of lords and peasants is part of Christianity.
Then why people say it is part of Hinduism?
Again, the very word 'religion' is of western origin.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion#Etymology
The correct word for Hinduism in Sanskrit is 'Sanatan Dharma'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism
'sanatan' means eternal and 'dharma' means duties.
There is nothing in Hinduism that says that in order to be
considered a Hindu you have to believe in this God
or do exactly as written in this particular book.
In short,
there is no perfect definitin/answer so as to who is a Hindu.
Hinduism is a way of life not just a set of beliefs.
You can be a 'athiest' and still be a Hindu.
(read about the charvaka traditions in Hinduism)
Traditionally ,Hinduism did not accept any converts.
One was considered Hindu only if he was born into a Hindu family.
Hindus never tried to convert others the reason is
Hindus believe in the concept of 'vasudev kutumbakum',
which means, 'the whole world is my family'.
Hindus believe that there is more than one way to reach God.
You can be a Christian and still reach God.
you can be a Muslim and still reach God.
In Hinduism one is judged solely based on one's deeds not any believe system.
Recently,from the last century or a bit more onwards,
Hindus have also started accepting converts.
If you convert to Hinduism you can most probably say
you belong to a particular varna based on your occupation.
But again ,there is no particular central authority in hinduism,
who can lay down hard and fast rules in Hinduism.
Different people will have diferent opinions in this matter.
I bet ,if you say that you have converted and become a Brahmin
not many will raise an eyebrow.
Some food for thought:
A Sunni muslim will not go to a Shia mosque .
A Shia muslim will not go to a Sunni mosque .
A catholic christian will not go to a protestant church.
A Protestant Christian will not go to a Catholic Church.
In Buddhism you have these Hinayana and Mahayana sects.
These sects have different places of worship
Iin Hinduism , people of all caste go to the same place of worship.
Hinduism divides or unites?
------------------------------
Am not againt any religion...I read and respect ,accept good points from other religion too...if any hard feeling sorry for that....when we talking about cast system in a particular religion it will happen sometime so Dil pe mat lođ
Edited by Believe - 18 years ago