Are Men Secure ?? - Page 8

Originally posted by: mermaid_QT

Are we talking anyone particular here?? 😛. This is onece again becoming report-worthy in that case the way I see it ? Pleeeeease assure me I am wrong 😊.
luv,
subha-di

Man sometimes i need to get the undercurrents.. So Cutes according to you some personal references are made here while talking about generally 5 girls....😕. Wish I could have a girls brain in these dire times of need...😆😆

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

I would have agreed with you if you were talkin about a street guy.. but once a guy logs in to internet and behaves arbitrarily... its always good not to profile him for what he is...Most guys who are big problem on internet are the ones who always come across as holier than thou or nice people...thats their route to build trust...😊

Was the discussion only about guys who log in to the internet?? If that's the case, it's always difficult to know as it's what we call the virtual world. Here we see the person based on what s/he writes on the forum as there's no way we can see what s/he is doing in real life or on PMs or other mediums and we can't really verify everything s/he says.

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Man sometimes i need to get the undercurrents.. So Cutes according to you some personal references are made here while talking about generally 5 girls....😕. Wish I could have a girls brain in these dire times of need...😆😆

THE words SOUL SISTERS caught my eye 😛- a term used a lot in DM... Not 5 people, unless the poster is willing to share SOUL sisters in any KEKTA SOAP.. 😆😆😆
Also, men security thread has also been drifted a certain way and many of see that as a motive, no just soul - sisters😉.. 😳

The topic started as men's security, was diverted to injustice to men by false accusations, then when we were discussing about TAXIWALA being complained by several 5 women, SOL-SISTERS and internet accusation of man were discussed.. You see my point fried qwerty? 😳.. So I asked innocent question as to whether I was wrong in the above interpretations😳

Originally posted by: souro

Was the discussion only about guys who log in to the internet?? If that's the case, it's always difficult to know as it's what we call the virtual world. Here we see the person based on what s/he writes on the forum as there's no way we can see what s/he is doing in real life or on PMs or other mediums and we can't really verify everything s/he says.

More or less since we assume some education in these interactions.. Guy who is whistling and whiling away his time under lamp posts is not going to login to the forum and receive a judgement...😊

regarding profiling individuals its not too difficult - just let them keep on posting on random things and eventually you can see a pattern in their thinking.. based on which fairly good judgement can be derived...😊

Originally posted by: mermaid_QT

THE words SOUL SISTERS caught my eye 😛- a term used a lot in DM... Not 5 people, unless the poster is willing to share SOUL sisters in any KEKTA SOAP.. 😆😆😆
Also, men security thread has also been drifted a certain way and many of see that as a motive, no just soul - sisters😉.. 😳

The topic started as men's security, was diverted to injustice to men by false accusations, then when we were discussing about TAXIWALA being complained by several 5 women, SOL-SISTERS and internet accusation of man were discussed.. You see my point fried qwerty? 😳.. So I asked innocent question as to whether I was wrong in the above interpretations😳

Whoa....Whoa... so many things happening. Ok I will just be a good honest by-stander from now on, whenever there is reference to any number etc..in discussions..😆...

but why are you frying me for such innocent questions....😆

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Whoa....Whoa... so many things happening. Ok I will just be a good honest by-stander from now on, whenever there is reference to any number etc..in discussions..😆...
but why are you frying me for such innocent questions....😆

nope, it was for the poster, not you 😳😳😳.. but by quoting me, you landed in an INSECURE zone?

lolz.. that insecure zone comment means nothing qwerty. I am just trying to take this topic "Are men insecure"- way.. instead of keeping in on the track it is currently forced into 😆😆😆.

Originally posted by: lighthouse

Flirtatious and indecent is not the same thing btw...and is highly relative and subjective to an individual.. But to answer your question, let's say the character of SRK in DDLJ as Raj who is open flirt and mischievious but a nice guy nevertheless and some other "decent" guy as in Kekta serial who is has ulterior motive.. In hindsight one would choose to deal with known then unknown and isn't it upto the interested girl to decide how far she should go with each character knowing their behaviour.. I suppose one would choose to trust the so called decent guy more then the flirtatious guy and more often then not the girls become victims when they trust "decent" guys who might have ulterior motives...This is usually the case onthe internet..

Flirtatious and indecent are not same, similarly the debate was never about simple flirtations. When the allegations are brought, it's termed sexual harassment, which in no way means harmless flirting. If some girl complains because of flirting then such complains are immediately trashed, of course before that the guy is subjected to scrutiny. If many girls bring the same complaint and it's found that it was really indecent behaviour on the guys part then there's nothing wrong to take action against him. If the situation is such that only one girl is complaining and the rest are vouching for that guy's decency, only then we can say that the particular girl is wrong.

And if you too are talking only about internet and virtual life then the equation changes drastically. Afterall, s/he's judged based on what s/he writes, there's nothing else that can be done and it's not worth the time and effort. Btw, everyone knows the rules for any forum that they join, when they violate those rules repeatedly, it's they who're to be blamed if other users suspect their character or motive. And those who act decent on the internet doesn't always mean they're putting on an act, afterall someone who has some ulterior motive will come out of his act some time or the other, even if subtly to test the waters.

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

More or less since we assume some education in these interactions.. Guy who is whistling and whiling away his time under lamp posts is not going to login to the forum and receive a judgement...😊

regarding profiling individuals its not too difficult - just let them keep on posting on random things and eventually you can see a pattern in their thinking.. based on which fairly good judgement can be derived...😊

Nah, when I started posting it was only about men and whether they are insecure because of the current laws, no mention of whether they are internet users or not. Anyway, since the discussion now is about only internet users, as I said then it's a completely different situation as we don't really know the real person.

Originally posted by: mermaid_QT

[
The topic started as men's security, was diverted to injustice to men by false accusations, then when we were discussing about TAXIWALA being complained by several 5 women, SOL-SISTERS and internet accusation of man were discussed.. You see my point fried qwerty? 😳.. So I asked innocent question as to whether I was wrong in the above interpretations😳

But isn't this the trajectory of more then 95% of debates here. My observation is that in almost every thread there is more of masti, frivolous chats, flirting/bonding, self serving agenda etc then the debate itself...😉 and after all we are all drive by debaters here and I must say the original debate does get a more broader perspective when all is said and done...Imo

Originally posted by: lighthouse

But isn't this the trajectory of more then 95% of debates here. My observation is that in almost every thread there is more of masti, frivolous chats, flirting/bonding, self serving agenda etc then the debate itself...😉 and after all we are all drive by debaters here and I must say the original debate does get a more broader perspective when all is said and done...Imo

Is that right? My fan mail never accused me of such 😃 and I get plenty as a debator. so, I would have no clue and you will have to excuse me on writing my comments on that one 😳.....
qt