Is it Time to review Juvenile Justice - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

16

Views

2.1k

Users

12

Likes

27

Frequent Posters

-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#11
There are many loop hole in indian law esply in rape cases...law says underage get maximum 3year jail, a rape is a rape,.. many rape offenders in this country are also first time offenders ,they doing like this acts cos they dont fear the law and the system...the minor guy remove that poor girls intestine with his bare hands and also was mainly responsible in throwing her out off the moving vehicle without of her clothes n this is really cruel some...now he can escape from punishment becos of our poor law...like this situation govt should not waste time in changing this law as it will get complete support from all parliament members and also from all the people in this country.
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#12
If a person is old enough to rape or murder he is old enough to undergo trial for the crimes. Is that so difficult to understand 😕
McNinja thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#13
I've heard of many cases where kids as young as 14 get tried as adults, depending on the crime. Whether they get convicted to an adult sentence is a different story. In the States at least, the crime is looked at to determine how to try someone. And that's how this juvenile in the rape case should be treated as well. His crime was a heinous one and he deserves no leniency.

Kids mature and take part in adult activities at a younger age. There is a reason we have 13 year olds that are pregnant. Laws should generally reflect this change in the mindset of the youngsters.

But once again, here is the justice system letting loopholes make it easier for the criminal, while having red tape to make it harder for the victim.


571304 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#14
If some one is old enough to commit a brutal rape, then he is old enough to face the punishments too...
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#15
The juvenile board trying the sixth accused case in the gang rape case has turned down the petition to get the 17 year old criminal tried along with the other accomplices inspite of the heinous nature of his crimes 😡
The justice Verma report does not give much hope of bringing about any major changes 😔
Xarina thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago
#16
Justice Verma has disappointed me on that point. We are not talking about petty theft, vandalism, or immature irrationality. This was a crime most horrid. Rather than look at the age they should look at the severity of the crime. To let this particular excuse go free in three years will only give him licence to commit more heinous crimes on some poor girl/boy. He has the bloodlust now.
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#17
Gang-rape victim's kin appalled as 6th accused declared minorJan 28, 2013, 07.48 PM IST
BALLIA (UP)/DELHI: The family of the Delhi gang-rape victim expressed shock on Monday and termed the juvenile justice board's (JJB) decision of ruling the sixth accused in the case as minor as "unfortunate" and said that they would challenge it in the court.

"The family would consult legal experts and challenge the matter in the relevant court," the brother of the girl told over phone from Delhi.

"The family is not ready to accept that the sixth accused get anything less than death penalty," the brother said, adding that the minor accused should also get the same punishment of death penalty for which the central government should make necessary changes in the law.

"How can the family accept that the main accused is let off with a mere three year imprisonment," he asked.

On the decision of the juvenile board, the brother said that it is based on his school documents whereas he should have been sent for medical examination.

He expressed apprehension of some kind of "fraud" in mentioning the date of birth in school documents and alleged that the minor accused was the one who had played the main role in the incident.

Earlier on Monday, the sixth accused in the case was declared by the JJB in Delhi as a "minor", which would enable him to walk free by June 4, this year when he attains the age of 18 years.

The accused, who was described as the most brutal of the six accused by the Delhi Police in its charge sheet, was declared as 17 years and six months and 24 days-old (as of today) by the JJB, which relied on his birth certificate and school documents produced before it.

Section 15 (g) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act mandates that a juvenile aged between 16-18 years if convicted of any offence can be sentenced to be sent to a special home for a period of three years at the maximum, and, thereafter, be released on probation.

However, section 16 of the Act also provides that a juvenile can only be kept at the special home till he attains 18 years of age and he cannot be sent to jail thereafter, which in effect will result in his release.

The JJB also rejected the police's plea for bone ossification test of the sixth accused for determining his age.

Lawyers appearing for the prosecution said they appeal against the JJB order in a higher court.

Earlier on January 15, the principal of the school, from where the juvenile had droppoed out, had submitted before the JJB that as per the school records he is 17 years and six months-old.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".