🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: Ind vs Zim 48th Match,26 Feb 🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: WI vs SA 47th Match,26 Feb 🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: NZ vs Eng 49th Match,27 Feb 🏏
MUKTI SAVES MAIRA 26.2
NIGHT STAYY 27.2
Kya Rishta tyar hai ek aur leap lene ko? -SBS
Jogan Is Back
TRP ka Kamal Holi par Sasural lauti Abheera
Alia Bhatt - for Gucci - at the Milan Fashion Week
Originally posted by: osama-bin-joe
depends. if the person gets more entertained via the comp then no he isn't. But if he aimlessly does it and doesn't really do anything but sit in front of the comp he is kind of wasting his time.
Hey the internet is a great source for knowledge too.It all depends how it is utilized.But yes a balance is needed in all things.I read a lot of sports and other news from the internet.But when I am with family and real people I do not go on the net ( considered rude and inconsiderate by some).A loser is a person who stops trying or give up easily. We must make the effort and be patient. Results matter but it does not mean we are losers if we fail, so long as we keep trying we are winners.
Many people who are actively social in real life will find that people who socialize only on the internet are losers.
Behaviorists though have found that internet socialization is no different than real life socialization – the only difference is the mode of communication and connection has changed to a virtual medium.
Most people in today's day and age will have a blend of real and virtual socialization.
Although a very small group socializes, interacts and spends majority to 100% of their time on the internet – as long as they socialize, perform day to day tasks, have steady employment to sustain their lifestyles – then there is no harm in it. Just because some people need to see people, be around people and talk face to face sometimes does not mean that other humans cannot be content with virtual only interactions.
But whether or not I am a loser, only my actions and achievements get to decide, not some random man on TV judging people on the basis of the tactics they implement to get into their show.
That random man on TV is judging because that guy gave him the chance to judge him. That guy went there willing to undergo the scrutiny and judgement. That random man has his own yardstick just like everyone else. In someone else's yardstick that random man might be a loser for producing such a garbage show. It's all subjective.
Originally posted by: TheUltimate
Living only a virtual life on the internet and be unable/unwilling to mingle with real people makes a person weird or odd. I would still not call them a loser. Usually, they turn out to be geeks or pedophiles based on what are they doing on the internet.