LOST IN CASE 3.1.26
SRK Targetted Again
X-MAS PARTYY 02.01.26
King and Love & War to split in 2 parts inspired by Dhurandhar??
People do care about Abhiara/Abhiru!!
7 year leap for Yeh Rishta
Band Baaja Baaraat To Re- Release
Happy 300 Manvikians.....
Akshay Kumar & Rani Mukerji in OMG 3?
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Depends on the perspective...of how you see a 'better life' or mean by a 'better life'...
Are we 'morally' better than are 'fore fathers'...probably not...and for me leading a morally correct life is more important than leading a comfortable life...Are we leading a better life in all other aspects...like material comforts, education, technology, medicine and cure etc...I would say yes ...we are leading a better life than our fore fathers...
You have to be kidding urselves ..if u think that our forefathers did not have stress...they may seem simple to u considering the technology we have today at our disposal but they were big challenges for them...even sending a message to someone must have been a big stress considering they depended on pigeon mails and smoke signals for communication...regarding compromises and adjustments don't u think they must be making more of that especially the women folk?...Originally posted by: taanufanvartika
but wht abt the stress and compromises, adjustments tht we have?
Originally posted by: blue-ice
Are we 'morally' better than are 'fore fathers'...probably not...and for me leading a morally correct life is more important than leading a comfortable life...
I think whether our lives are morally better is relative.
Perhaps the nuclear family, disintegration of old school family values and heightened sexuality might not seem moral.
However, in terms of the fact that we deem that even girls have a right to go to school, even women should also be able to have careers, that men and women are equally responsible for children and household, that girls should not be married as soon as they hit puberty, that demanding dowry is wrong and harassing a girl for dowry is horrid, that respect and love in families ought to be mutual and no one person should have absolute authority over another due to age or relation, that women who cannot conceive need to be treated with respect and compassion too and that the inability to conceive can also lie in the man, that widows/widowers also need to be treated with respect and it is OK for them to remarry and have families especially when young, that our caste system is a societal wrong just like racism, that our temples and public places cannot be exclusive for the upper elite and a lot more ' I would believe there are many ways we are morally better off as well.
Are we morally superior or inferior to our forefathers? I don't know and I don't think we can fairly assume either way. But I think we have a lot of morality going for us and some against us, and like with every generation we are just a product of our times.
When I said morally better...i was not even thinking about the marriage or families etc...I was thinking more about crimes and corruption and there is no doubt in my mind that our generation is weaker morally when it comes to crimes and corruption...Originally posted by: return_to_hades
I think whether our lives are morally better is relative.
Perhaps the nuclear family, disintegration of old school family values and heightened sexuality might not seem moral.
However, in terms of the fact that we deem that even girls have a right to go to school, even women should also be able to have careers, that men and women are equally responsible for children and household, that girls should not be married as soon as they hit puberty, that demanding dowry is wrong and harassing a girl for dowry is horrid, that respect and love in families ought to be mutual and no one person should have absolute authority over another due to age or relation, that women who cannot conceive need to be treated with respect and compassion too and that the inability to conceive can also lie in the man, that widows/widowers also need to be treated with respect and it is OK for them to remarry and have families especially when young, that our caste system is a societal wrong just like racism, that our temples and public places cannot be exclusive for the upper elite and a lot more ' I would believe there are many ways we are morally better off as well.
Are we morally superior or inferior to our forefathers? I don't know and I don't think we can fairly assume either way. But I think we have a lot of morality going for us and some against us, and like with every generation we are just a product of our times.
Originally posted by: blue-ice
You have to be kidding urselves ..if u think that our forefathers did not have stress...they may seem simple to u considering the technology we have today at our disposal but they were big challenges for them...even sending a message to someone must have been a big stress considering they depended on pigeon mails and smoke signals for communication...regarding compromises and adjustments don't u think they must be making more of that especially the women folk?...
Everything is relative . Robin hood stole, killing the enemy is considered an act of valour, lying and cheating by lawyers is considered skill. Depends on one's perspectives -Originally posted by: blue-ice
When I said morally better...i was not even thinking about the marriage or families etc...I was thinking more about crimes and corruption and there is no doubt in my mind that our generation is weaker morally when it comes to crimes and corruption...
I agree with you on the women issues that you have mentioned that we are definitely better off than our forefathers and that is why if you see my second post ...I did say that the women had to make more compromises and adjustments in the older generations...Marriage and families are a matter of personal choice...u want to marry or not, want to live in a joint family and nuclear family are all personal choices...people should never be judged on that basis...For me being moral is not lying, stealing, cheating, killing etc...some of the basics that would stand true in every generation, in every culture and every country...when I compare its only on the basis of these...rest is all relative and depends on perspective...

Voice or Expression: Singer or the Actress ? Who Gives Depth to a Song Scene in Indian movies? The singer (voice + expression): A playback...
17