U.S. intelligence after 9/11

Page

Next Last

Believe

@-Believe-

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

Hi all,

Do you think US's entire intelligence community, based on faulty premises and unrealistic expectations.!? US keep saying that Saddam Hussein has WMD,he does not have WMD.. or they simply do not know...Now a leaked report from US intelligence says, CIA found no link between Saddam Hussein and AlQaeda and now another leaked intelligence says that war actually produced a new breed of radicals and terrorist.! Do you believe, cos of these type of wrong deeds,world peace improved!!? ....Do you think America's gov't care about peace ?

Views and comments plz

Edited by Believe - 15 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

us people will always have the same intelligence, unfortunately.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Summer3

@Summer3

Trailblazer

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Believe
Hi all,

Do you think entire intelligence community, based on faulty premises and unrealistic expectations.!? US keep saying that Saddam Hussein has WMD,he does not have WMD.. or they simply do not know...Now a leaked report from US intelligence says, CIA found no link between Saddam Hussein and AlQaeda and now another leaked intelligence says that war actually produced a new breed of radicals and terrorist.! Do you believe, cos of these type of wrong deeds,world peace improved!!? ....Do you think America's gov't care about peace ?

Views and comments plz

It was the UN officer who claimed that they did not find any WMD.

UK felt obliged to listen to US . The mass murder in Iraq is unacceptable and Bush is to blame.

Edited by Summer3 - 15 years ago

Quote

return_to_hades

@return_to_hades

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 15 years ago

The less said about US intelligence the better. They have been less effective in stopping actual terrorists and more effective in harassing civilians. The foreign policy has always been flawed. The US has a policy of intervention and preemptive action which has not been effective. Forget Iraq - US is a country that has had its nose in wars across the world since the world wars (and it had no business in WWI).

I feel that the 'war on terror' is the right idea, but US needs to go back to the drawing board and rethink its execution which has always been flawed.

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

The US Intelligence is involved only in one thing - singling out and finding ways to exterminate Leaders or regimes that do not serve the interests of its MNCs. 'Nuff said.

@RTH : The War on Terror started off on the right note when it began, but it was soon corrupted by Hawks seeking to use it for ulteriro motives...btw, Why Is OBL missing yet?

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

first of all terrorists are individuals and not nations so you cant fight terrorism using the armed forces!!! you just make more enemies and terrorists by innocent collateral damage!!!

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

@ Qwerty- thats not always the case......many a times Terrorism IS funded by the state - the most prominent example being Pakistan...however, the US got it wrong when they chose Imperialistic hubris over Actual fight- thats why they kept on arming Pak with Missiles and fighter Jets while Bush struck Oil deals with Saudi princes....and meanwhile an Innocent country Iraq fell victim to their Oil Lust.

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

@ Qwerty- thats not always the case......many a times Terrorism IS funded by the state - the most prominent example being Pakistan...however, the US got it wrong when they chose Imperialistic hubris over Actual fight- thats why they kept on arming Pak with Missiles and fighter Jets while Bush struck Oil deals with Saudi princes....and meanwhile an Innocent country Iraq fell victim to their Oil Lust.

Right you are..

Quote

Bankim Chandra Chaterjee

@mr.ass

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

not exactly, quert and krys. Nations include civilians , as well.

Sadly, those civilians think the same about other nations being terrorists. 😆 not just the govt guys or the few actual terrorists.

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: old-black-joe
not exactly, quert and krys. Nations include civilians , as well.

Sadly, those civilians think the same about other nations being terrorists. 😆 not just the govt guys or the few actual terrorists.

If its state sponsored its upto the people to decide if they wanna be there or leave.. for eg.. afghanistan etc... if civilians cant overthrow their terror sponsoring govt. they become party to it.. and I think relativity doesnt work here.. Everybody knows who the terrorist is.. Its not ambiguous there....

Quote

1 2

U.S. intelligence after 9/11

Related Topics

Explore Topics