Tips for contestants to survive in DID (spoiler) - Page 3

Originally posted by: ThatOneGuy

Yes, Lipsa, but at least she's talented, she already got eliminated 😕

I don't know, maybe I am wrong, but obviously we can't ignore that fact. Only Chuck Norris can tell how in the hell DID selects it's contestants

@Others, idk why everyone is stuck on only one detail and not seeing the whole picture I went for 😕 These are few of the same people who used to write Urvashi shouldn't be in top 18 and now all of a sudden when she is related to Jai, we should stop picking on her 😆

@pigbelly Yes she is most definitely Jai's student 😛

Anywhoo, have fun guys 😊

Originally posted by: ThatOneGuy

• Perform below average
• Look good
• Have connections

That's pretty much it 😕 What better example than Urvashi? That girl has been performing mediocre since day 1, and she's enjoying her stay like a boss. Not to mention, she is Jai Kumar Nair's student-cum-assistant-cum-girlfriend 😳 And others, like Sneha and Lipsa who are probably the strongest of girls and perform awesomely each week get eliminated.

So to pretty much survive in DID, never perform well and always look good. 👍🏼

Great work Zee production team 👏

Originally posted by: ThatOneGuy

maybe, maybe not...that's not important😆Although he keeps posting on his FB page, "Urvashi I love ya, I'm proud of ya" etc etc😆

Originally posted by: ThatOneGuy

I am done explaining myself here 😆

I think you may have missed the point some people were trying to make. No one was trying to say that you should not criticize Urvashi or single her out at all. Many people do agree that she has unfairly survived while other much better dancers have been eliminated.

What people had an objection to is targeting her over her connections to Jai. Jai is honestly not that connected to influence the stay of his friends/students on the show. Moreover, other contestants/affiliates have had their students on the show. Most importantly no one has any clue on the logic utilized by makers of DID. Who they select, who they keep, who they eliminate is a mystery. Feel free to criticize and point out anyone who is undeserving to be there, but do it strictly on the basis of what we see on screen. It is Ok to bring in connections/relationships etc in humor – but when you fixate on it, it becomes unfair and gossipy. Bottom line is, no one has a problem with criticizing or targeting Urvashi – just do it on the right and fair basis.

The other point of contention some people might have is the insinuation of a relationship between Jai and Urvashi based on his FB messages. "I Love you, I'm proud of you" are words of endearment and affection. Some people never say such things unless they are really close to someone. But many people express such things frequently to close friends and people they care for and it carries no romantic weight. A good rule of thumb is always to try and avoid discussing social media or external media in general unless the main focus is actually the dance, the show and the content.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

I think you may have missed the point some people were trying to make. No one was trying to say that you should not criticize Urvashi or single her out at all. Many people do agree that she has unfairly survived while other much better dancers have been eliminated.

What people had an objection to is targeting her over her connections to Jai. Jai is honestly not that connected to influence the stay of his friends/students on the show. Moreover, other contestants/affiliates have had their students on the show. Most importantly no one has any clue on the logic utilized by makers of DID. Who they select, who they keep, who they eliminate is a mystery. Feel free to criticize and point out anyone who is undeserving to be there, but do it strictly on the basis of what we see on screen. It is Ok to bring in connections/relationships etc in humor ' but when you fixate on it, it becomes unfair and gossipy. Bottom line is, no one has a problem with criticizing or targeting Urvashi ' just do it on the right and fair basis.

The other point of contention some people might have is the insinuation of a relationship between Jai and Urvashi based on his FB messages. "I Love you, I'm proud of you" are words of endearment and affection. Some people never say such things unless they are really close to someone. But many people express such things frequently to close friends and people they care for and it carries no romantic weight. A good rule of thumb is always to try and avoid discussing social media or external media in general unless the main focus is actually the dance, the show and the content.

It is not always explicit words, but implicit meaning that make a difference. From your verbiage it came off as you were more fixated on the Jai connection, rather than other criticisms. It also came off that you wanted to link them in a gossipy way. Of course, I believe that your intent was not to gossip or make a big deal about Jai, but give fair objective criticism that she does not deserve to be there. But it just came off very differently in the topic. Miscommunications, misunderstandings happen on a forum, no biggie. Just pointing it out.😊

The only person who said Jai and Urvashi have no connection as far as I can see is pigsbelly4myfeet who said "Please...I refuse to believe that Urvashi is Jai's student. Jai and Urvashi have no comparison as dancers. Jai was just too awesome and Urvashi is simply average". Which again I think highlights explicit words and implicit meaning. It was like a hyperbole. They don't actually think there is no connection, the implicit meaning is "Urvashi is so mediocre that it is hard to believe she was trained by the very talented Jai" [At least that's how I interpret it ' and on an ADD side note pigsbelly4myfeet is a very intriguing userid, it makes me picture a person with many layers of bacon wrapped on their feet instead of shoes and socks]

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

@TOG

It is not always explicit words, but implicit meaning that make a difference. From your verbiage it came off as you were more fixated on the Jai connection, rather than other criticisms. It also came off that you wanted to link them in a gossipy way. Of course, I believe that your intent was not to gossip or make a big deal about Jai, but give fair objective criticism that she does not deserve to be there. But it just came off very differently in the topic. Miscommunications, misunderstandings happen on a forum, no biggie. Just pointing it out.😊

The only person who said Jai and Urvashi have no connection as far as I can see is pigsbelly4myfeet who said "Please...I refuse to believe that Urvashi is Jai's student. Jai and Urvashi have no comparison as dancers. Jai was just too awesome and Urvashi is simply average". Which again I think highlights explicit words and implicit meaning. It was like a hyperbole. They don't actually think there is no connection, the implicit meaning is "Urvashi is so mediocre that it is hard to believe she was trained by the very talented Jai" [At least that's how I interpret it ' and on an ADD side note pigsbelly4myfeet is a very intriguing userid, it makes me picture a person with many layers of bacon wrapped on their feet instead of shoes and socks]

Originally posted by: desicrowd

Wow in that aspect lemme shout out loud... TL I Love ya... M proud of ya... Hmmm m now TL's gf... Thanks thatoneguy... Saras idea Che dikro... M proud of ya too 😆...

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

@TOG

It is not always explicit words, but implicit meaning that make a difference. From your verbiage it came off as you were more fixated on the Jai connection, rather than other criticisms. It also came off that you wanted to link them in a gossipy way. Of course, I believe that your intent was not to gossip or make a big deal about Jai, but give fair objective criticism that she does not deserve to be there. But it just came off very differently in the topic. Miscommunications, misunderstandings happen on a forum, no biggie. Just pointing it out.😊

The only person who said Jai and Urvashi have no connection as far as I can see is pigsbelly4myfeet who said "Please...I refuse to believe that Urvashi is Jai's student. Jai and Urvashi have no comparison as dancers. Jai was just too awesome and Urvashi is simply average". Which again I think highlights explicit words and implicit meaning. It was like a hyperbole. They don't actually think there is no connection, the implicit meaning is "Urvashi is so mediocre that it is hard to believe she was trained by the very talented Jai" [At least that's how I interpret it ' and on an ADD side note pigsbelly4myfeet is a very intriguing userid, it makes me picture a person with many layers of bacon wrapped on their feet instead of shoes and socks]