what the hell..again contemporary

im am tired with shakti giving contemporary dance....right from the start and now again at the end she does it again...i know she is good at it but new styles should have been done..its just my opinion..

and what is going on, yesterday punit did a song on india and now shakti, this is truly the perfect way to cater lots of votes...

First of all her dance was NOT contemporary. It was Indo-Fusion. And there is a huge difference in the two different forms! Second off, an act on India is not to gain more votes by the public! Its so pathetic to even think that. An act on India is to show that we as Indians respect the country, the nation, the people, etc etc etc! Its to raise awareness that we are all united!

Yes naddim, the last one wasn't contemp. But I do agree, she mostly did contemp in the starting before masters told her to do anything else.

nope it was a mixture of contemporary and indian freestyle...but still there was contemporary in it...

No there is a difference between ALL contemporary and a small segment of contemporary! Her performance was Indo-Fusion. There may have been small portion of contemporary but the style itself was Indo- Fusion!

Originally posted by: Cutiepie Rani

No there is a difference between ALL contemporary and a small segment of contemporary! Her performance was Indo-Fusion. There may have been small portion of contemporary but the style itself was Indo- Fusion!

IDK exactly, coz in starting in the bottom wen it saws "Shakti" "Mumbai, India" and style said "Comtemporary, Indofusion"

That's probably because it did have a bit of contemporary in it. But I saw a lot more of Indo-Fusion. It was a mix of everything! It was NOT however purely contemporary!

Someone thinks she did it to garner votes..??