Shakti has been doing different styles. I will admit though, they are of similar genres - Like Jitterbug and Lindy Hop - different genres but similar in origins and movements.
I can understand the criticism that she perhaps needs to breakaway into something absolutely different, diametrically opposite in pace, origins and movements. However, I find it rich when Remo says that masters try to take the dancer away from familiar genres - for he did not build Prince on just a genre, a genre has diversity in moves, he built Prince on one single type of move - LnP.
Anywho, whats better Jack of all trades, master of none - or achieving perfection. Shakti has achieved exemplary perfection in what she does. Every time she performs she still manages to entertain me fully. I agree versatility is very important, but seeing how disconnected some others have seemed with doing different genres, sometimes even their own forte - I feel that maybe everyone perfected what they can do into a mindblowing performance and then moved on.
I guess some people are Ok eating exquisite food everyday, even if the dish is always Chinese. But others would rather have Italian one day Mexican the next even if the lasagna is undercooked and the tacos have no seasoning.
Edited by return_to_hades - 16 years ago