iftikar and yash

Dahleez as such gives us lot of substance to think.. makers have done a wonderful job
coming to... iftikar he is a Muslim and asad is also a muslim...years back...der was an article in The Hindu..With a tag..all Muslims are not terrorists But every terrorist is a Muslim...I never
thought deeply abt dis..iftikar has no brotherly feelings for asad like a fellow muslim..he is just a ruthless terrorist and asad a very innocent proud indian muslim...so terrorism has NO Religion...he just used asad as a pawn..destroyed his life...terrorist org like taliban alquieda isis kills innocent muslims only...for wat are dey doing dis..not to upgrade their religion..definitely not...just to spread terror...i never understood dis...asad's sacrifice and love for his country will be a moment of honour for his community and d one like iftikar a shame and
disgrace...
And coming to yash. ..I really liked dat d CV's did a gud job. .in not showing yash as a adarsh desh par mar mitne wala sipahi... showed dat people like yash are present in d army .who can misuse their power , selfish and can trap an innocent...all army men are not patriots...d one's like yash also wear d uniform ...and d punishment yash will get..stripped of all powers ...will be a lesson..

no..every terorist is not a muslim n dabh showed that..there r terrorist in all religion...n supporting terrorism is nowhere less than terrorism..so for me yash is a terrorist

I think that's what makers want to say.. terrorism has no religion.. Yash killed (directly or indirectly but he killed) an innocent soul who fought for his country when he wasn't binded by any duty unlike Abhay and Yash.. Yash asked his co-worker what would he get if he diffuses the bomb where as Abhay never thought about any such thing else he would be attending his brother's wedding.. That's the difference between them and their power of duties. Asad on the other hand purely for country fought and gave his precious life nobody expected him to do so and neither he was compelled by any duty.

Originally posted by: DiscoDhokla

I think that's what makers want to say..is terrorism has no religion.. Yash killed (directly or indirectly but he killed) an innocent soul who fought for his country when he wasn't binded by any duty unlike Abhay and Yash.. Yash asked his co-worker what would he get if he diffuses the bomb where as Abhay never thought about any such thing else he would be attending his brother's wedding.. That's the difference between them and their power of duties. Asad on the other hand purely for country fought and gave his precious life nobody expected him to do so and neither he was compelled by any duty.

We cannot compare abhay and yash...yash being a army officer is far away..he is not even a human being...he is just vile.. and asad he is a responsible citizen..and he clearly had d guilt of trusting iftikar and crew...he wanted to stop dem from cheating other people and destroying their city...

The Hindu is a progressive-liberal paper and could have never said all Muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim. It must have used the line used by the right-wing in order to refute it. I can vouch for this.

Originally posted by: rohini55

The Hindu is a progressive-liberal paper and could have never said all Muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim. It must have used the line used by the right-wing in order to refute it. I can vouch for this.

what's wrong in it ? all muslim's are not terrorists...though the world wide terrorist org are muslim based..taliban alquieda isis boko haram...and dis was an article published by hindu

Originally posted by: arshi2

no..every terorist is not a muslim n dabh showed that..there r terrorist in all religion...n supporting terrorism is nowhere less than terrorism..so for me yash is a terrorist

I will go with Rohini. Though the org like Al-Qaeda, Taliban and new IS has Muslim as the front face, what runs them, who runs them. What are the powers behind. We need to look at the religion of those. Allan Trevor. Who is he. He is a christian. Who dropped his charges. Manohar and Jai being aware of it, Suha supporting it. All Hindus. So it is all game of throne. Power. And people like Yash they add to the list of white collar terrorists. Everyone who aides terrorism directly or indirectly knowingly are terrorists themselves.

Yash is a sadist white collar terrorist. He used his power to frame an innocent.
Not only he framed & indirectly got Asad killed, he pushed Abhay in danger zone too.
He is doing biggest harm to national security by not talking about iftikhar.

Iftikhar & terrorists like him succeed by 'sacrificing' good souls like Asad & Haider. How ruthlessly he claimed: these 2 kurbanis will bring his terror group more recruits.
This is how all these modules work, and this is how they get those misguided youths who they blow up to keep terror cycle run.
It is true terrorism should not be linked to religion- but it is also true: if your religion is used as reason for all these mass killings!
It is biggest challenge of our time.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

I will go with Rohini. Though the org like Al-Qaeda, Taliban and new IS has Muslim as the front face, what runs them, who runs them. What are the powers behind. We need to look at the religion of those. Allan Trevor. Who is he. He is a christian. Who dropped his charges. Manohar and Jai being aware of it, Suha supporting it. All Hindus. So it is all game of throne. Power. And people like Yash they add to the list of white collar terrorists. Everyone who aides terrorism directly or indirectly knowingly are terrorists themselves.

Yash knows there is a third terrorist and it is not Asad. So as a duty bound officer he has to search for them. Manohar and Suha knows Trevor money can be used for terrorism and he doesnt care how it is getting used. So he is also responsible for terrorism.

What Dahleez highlights is how muslims are lured by fanatics in their own religions for their purpose and how the other religions directly or indirectly aiding this process, keeping the blame on one religion alone.