DOWRY DEATH - By CIDians

As discussed here, we will try to see how we can enhance a potential plot and turn it into a better case. Try to re-write the story how you would have liked to see it.

You can visit this link for the referring to the actual case
EP 651 : Dowry Death (4-Sep-2010)

[Last time this idea did not go anywhere, giving it another shot lets see]

I just wish the Money and Dowry angle was exploited rather than making the affair the main motive.

The dad killing Mithali was uncalled for... he should have worked on saving his daughter rather than getting Mithali killed.

Will think up of what would've been a better plot by tomorrow...

agree wid zerry.......he should save his daughter

Involving the character Mitali was completely unneccesary and added to the negative point in my opinion. Instead of bringing in things like Extra marital affair and sense of revenge, theyshould have concentrated more on the Dowry aspect. They could have shown that they disnt find any dead body till
towards the end. Even of they did, it must hav not given much help... U know some trick that they find proof against the the in laws. 😕

Was it really a dowry issue? They planned to kill her so that Sandeep can marry Tripti. Was there any word against dowry in the episode itself?
Sandeep was not willing to give divorce because then he have to give the alimony. So it is also a case of domestic violence.

Title was misleading, I think writer mainly concentrated on creating suspense and making think viewers other way around and sympathetic towards father initially and then turning him out to be murderer. They kept on showing inlaws suspect, tried suspense.

1) showing 2 girls who are burnt actually one fully burnt and others hand only from here one could easily make out that two girls were involved better camera work could have done trick so suspense that Salunke tells this girl is not Trupti was broken along time back by very good camera work, firstly showing that a girl in full flames and secondly a girl running here and there and only hand burnt so one could make out two girls involved.

2) They should not have shown that CID telling parents that body is of Trupti. C'mon its Mumbai, do you know the population living there from just body which was found at so and so area, how they can. wait for DNA report. Why giving heart attack to parents (just general).

3) They could have shown that Trupti's father knew that other girl visited house as he has seen sometimes, so he knew that she knew where keys are and about number how he get they can make it clear in his confession.

they tried suspense so I am not disappointed but would have been very good if they worked on few things. What was going to happen next one can make out.

The main mistake i the call...From whom that father got No. of Mitali..kisane diya...it was stupidity...sent daughter for packinng and calling MIthali...yar enake son-in- law ko manana hi padega GF ka no bhi sasur ko apane deta hein😆

Originally posted by: jiya1

yar enake son-in- law ko manana hi padega GF ka no bhi sasur ko apane deta hein😆

They could have shown that he has seen GF with his son in Law or anything so he inquired and got her number or address. They just need to show that he know about her before hand was very well aware of everything that she comes to home and knows where keys are etc etc.