Radhika will never learn - Page 2

Originally posted by: bee5

Mishti,
No, A_D is referring to Rad & Dev's conversation after she has her conversation with Shantanu. I went and read the written update and actually I had not missed it. It is just that I was not concentrating and was in listen only mode and doing my important office work. So, I had seen Dev hitting on that lying wood log and saw Radhika coming to talk to him and I just looked away into my work and when I glanced to the video again, the scene I saw was after their blah blah conversation is done and Dev is again back to hitting that poor lying wood log. 😆

Originally posted by: chalhov

The writers have completely lost it as far dialogues and screenplay is concerned. They are again playing with the screenplay to justify the existance of Shantanu and to introduce Vishaka in the story.

Originally posted by: Sandeepa108

All she has to do is obtain the hospital records from Goa that state what age Vish's fetus was and tell what transpried there and how Vish confronted RaDev and then lost the baby. Just by the fetus age alone it can be established that Dev cannot be the father because Vish was in Mumbai when she got pregnant. They can call in film producers and other Mumbaites that knew Vish there as witnesses. But do these people ever think logically? No!

Maybe she had a good reason for not telling Dev. I think she want to protect him. We don't know what Stantanu wants. I hope she tell when he is proved innocent. Otherwise I agree she would be trouble again and this time it is her own fault. No one is forcing her to hide the truth from Dev this time. But Radhika is going to be Radhika always thinking about family and never about herself, and herself includes Dev feelings too.

Originally posted by: misti73

Bee she says the same sentence twice using different words......

"Ladies of the house hide loads of stuff for the happiness and honour ofthe family",,,,,,,,,,,,,this was to Sastriji and then babuji tells her not todo anyhting that is based on lie..............and then that if necessary she has to accept the snake for her husbands and families happiness.

"Whatever I am doing I am doing it for you and our family"...........this to Dev when he questions about Shantanu, but here she tells that Shantanu is there to help them, but Dev guesses that there is something that she is hiding.

That is why I asked what are the creatives upto........either the dialogues have been written by different people who don't have any clue as to what the other is writing or it might mean that if at the end in the Sabha or in front of the Purohits this fact comes out , then will it mean that Dev himself will ask everyone the question that earlier Radhika did this hiding stuff for Shastrijis honour and now she has done this for Devs honour....so if people are not blaming her for the latter then why are they blaming her for the former? He can also ask Shastriji that earlier Radhika made a deal with amma to protect Shastriji and for that Shastriji is still angry with her...........and now on the basis of Shastrijis guidance she made a deal with Shanatnu......so what is the difference now?

The writers have completely lost it as far dialogues and screenplay is concerned. They are again playing with the screenplay to justify the existance of Shantanu and to introduce Vishaka in the story.