Rant alert
Just went through SI IV..I think it was the IF one.
she could describe the characer of Ridra very well but not hers
She is simple girl who will get shades as the story progresses
reminds m of IVs on the character of Madhubala.
this coupled with iv that ST keeps on giving abt how Rudra is ruthless and blah blah..irks me so much
how hard is it to define more than one character in a show properly. The wrotters should learn from Mittals..they draga nd show crap sometimes but heck they have done a brilliant job with DABH and TP and to a certain extent PV too esp female lead
GH needs to stop writing if what I think is true
The show has potential but it can go colossaly wrong too..Barring SI's accent, the two stupid fringes on her forehead and excessive impetus on violence, I loved almost everything else
The hero of the show has to be the brilliant cinematography, direction, detailing and background score. Kudos to Siddhart Sengupta(the guy is brilliant in capturing desert..one just has to see gulal to know) and whoever is the cinematographer. The outdoor shots are superb, high quality, movie like amd it shows they have spend. Its refreshing to not see just houses and rooms.
I would hate to see it all going down the drain after the rising thanks to writers inability to define/grow/focus on more than.one character
PS: sorry for the bother but u all will have to bear this for a few days
Edited by NalayakShaitaan - 11 years ago