~CC~ WHen You Say Nothing AT all~24 (strictly IO) - Page 53

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

39.3k

Users

24

Likes

1.9k

Frequent Posters

-chamkilli- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: mishaj


meine sab kuch boldiya... 🤣
hamari telepathy ko kyaa huaa... 🥺 😆

shh..we have to wear a disguise 😆 🤗 curtain ke peeche sab chalta hain 😉
Ilahi_mera_Jiya thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: -chamkilli-

shh..we have to wear a disguise 😆 🤗 curtain ke peeche sab chalta hain 😉

oh taubaaa...!!🤡
-chamkilli- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago
GM! We are talking about our telepathic connection 😳
Ilahi_mera_Jiya thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: riti4u

wanted a clarification from anyone who know anythin on laws about IT Act- Do they hold similar offense at public sites...? or are they limited to personal attacks on private accounts..?

i dont know much abt it riti...
I guess we can approach against cyber bullying in the concerned sites for the issues..may be they'll let us know what r the limitations..
-chamkilli- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: riti4u

wanted a clarification from anyone who know anythin on laws about IT Act- Do they hold similar offense at public sites...? or are they limited to personal attacks on private accounts..?

Google baba helped me out 😛 note this is coming from lawyer itself

Based on your brief statement of facts, you may have a civil claim for "defamation" against the person who is "making false accusations" about you, although your attorney would need more information before competently deciding whether you have a case.

In Washington State, when someone makes a false statement to another person and this causes harm to that person's reputation and good name, the law calls this "defamation." There are two types of defamation, slander (spoken) and libel (written).

There are various defenses to defamation. If a complete defense applies, it means the plaintiff (aggrieved party) cannot recover against the defendant (allegedly at-fault party). In Washington State, there are two commonly recognized defenses to defamation: "truth" and "mere opinion." Here, people are allowed to speak the truth or express their opinions, as long as they do so in a way that does not imply to a reasonable person the existence of underlying facts.

As a potential plaintiff in a civil action, you have the burden of proving each part of your defamation case on a more likely than not basis. Even if you are successful in proving that someone made false statements about you to another person, you still do not have a case until you allege and prove that these false statements actually caused you a specific type of harm.

While, generally speaking, a plaintiff in a defamation action must prove that the defamation caused them to suffer from a specific type of harm, there are certain instances where Washington State Courts will assume the fact (but not extent) of damages if the false statement made to another person contains allegations that the Plaintiff had a loathsome disease, engaged in sexual misconduct, committed a serious felony, or engaged in shady business practices.

If the defendant makes harmful and false accusations to law enforcement and this leads to the institution of unjustifiable criminal proceedings against you, and if these proceedings are terminated in your favor and brought with malice and without probable cause, you could also have a claim for "Malicious Criminal Prosecution."
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago
😊
Edited by riti4u - 12 years ago
simim thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: amritaa10


i dont know much abt it riti...
I guess we can approach against cyber bullying in the concerned sites for the issues..may be they'll let us know what r the limitations..



I think public sites only...Section 66 and 67 is used and abused... Anything mildly derogatory especially to celebrities is invoked at the slightest provocation... One girl was arrested for liking a post... In ap one lady wrote something abt a politician on her fb wall and the police came from chirala where the case was files all the way to Secunderabad on a Sunday and arrested her... So ya the act is invoked at the slightest provocation
Edited by simim - 12 years ago
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 12 years ago
neha laws in US are diff frm that in India though...bt thnks fr sharin...interestin read..
-chamkilli- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago
Two guys had gotten arrested for making slight mockery comments against a politician leader on FB as well
-chamkilli- thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: riti4u

neha laws in US are diff frm that in India though...bt thnks fr sharin...interestin read..

I know and that's the saddest part but I am sure there is that much of a gap of a difference

Related Topics

Chat Clubs Thumbnail

Posted by: radix

2 years ago

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".