Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan & Shri Krishna CC#5 DONE! - Page 54

Originally posted by: Dpka1415

Hey Bhaiya here's my second set of ques.. .. :

plzzzz write 3-4sentences for each :

Your instruction perfectly suits to the questions ' they are ideally 3-4 lines/sentences answer naturally '. Otherwise I would have had to ask for the clarification whether this general guideline was intended more to be the maximum limit or minimum limit.😆🤣

Now adding this line after completing the post (previous paragraph was written when I had just read the questions and did primary thinking over them) - since they were naturally 3-4 liners, it became 8-9 liners due to the person replying and since you know me very well, I am sure you intended to get 8-9 liners only and therefore wrote 3-4 liner instruction.🤣🤣🤣

Q1. Do u believe that in 2012 the whole Earth will be destroyed ?? Yes or no ?? Give reasons.

I liked the movie 2012. I can't say perfectly whether I believe in this statement or don't believe. I can only say that it looks to be impossible and impractical though very nicely imagined and logically explained in the movie. Even though ordinary humans can't accurately know what is happening in the atmosphere or inside the earth magma or on North pole ' South pole, in their routine life and at what speed it is happening; but it should be a very very gradual natural process, But who knows ' Matsaavataar time pralay came out of nowhere just in a few days of time from the warning of Lord Vishnu to the king. If I have to give strictly one answer, then I would have to say that NO, I don't believe because had it been true, I would ask Krishna to strongly inspire me to create the reason to retire from all my economic activities just now at the very moment which he has not done so far though I always have the natural inclination towards it.😊 I still have somehow made up the mind not to retire and demonstrate best possible professional quality until the age of 40-45 as my mode of devotion towards my students. If I say that I believe, then my daily actions or routine behaviour of economic activity would mean to be irrational, stupid and inconsistent with my thoughts.

Q2. If u were given a chance to relive the life of any of the characters of Ramayan..... who would u like to be and why??

Hanumanji. He is both God and Devotee for me at the same time.

So he is the inspiration of Karma and devotion also and he himself is the form of devotion also.

As I replied to Gunia too, he is the ideal personification of Geeta ' Bhakti yog, Gyan yog, Karm yog.

Q3. Suppose the 2012 rumours r true .. wat would be the 3 things u wud like to do before everythng is finished?? And why?

1) I would go after all my family members, friends and relatives, students, students' parents and other known people ' as far as my span of social network is - to convince (Sam-dam-dand-bhed) them about the fact of the forthcoming event to convince them to leave all their activities and now Bhaj le Hari Hari. If required, even through the tool of anger or misbehaviour with harsh words irrespective of the identity of relation or age (Aapatti kaale maryaadaa na asti). Bharat with Keikei, Vibhishan with Ravan and Sudama of SK would be my ideals then in that situation. Or the best would be Balram like he becomes so eager to punish Lord Indra before Govardhan leela (Or Lakshman with Sugreev after monsoon season) ' pralay in sab ko khatam kare usse pehele mai hi is sansaar ke jo log bhakti se dur hain un sabko hal se sabak sikha dun aur dhamki se hi sahi par sidhe raaste par laa dun. Then my answer to Aishi's question to ask for the necessary super power would change ' now no time to hypnotize people individually ' now time to do serious angry and punishing action before they miss the bus of salvation when they get punishment by nature.

2) I would try to collect the information about what storage media or audio-video technology would work on the moon and accordingly I would like to initiate efforts to convert Ramayan upto Rajyabhishek, SK upto Kalyavan's death, BRC MB's Geeta episodes and most of Nitish Bharadwaj wisdom scenes, my favourite spiritual and message giving movies and my favourite bollywood and other bhajans into that compatible format with as many copies as possible.

3) I would search the people who have got the opportunity to leave the earth in spaceship and would find the best eligible and reliable guy in that (Else I would have to enter myself in that spaceship somehow by any means) to hand him over the Hinduism scriptures most importantly Shrimad Bhagwad Geeta and audio-video collection as mentioned in the point above. Best thing here to do would be or should be to wish for the super power of Aishi's question again and drag all the capitalist money power personalities out of the ship and take inside all (as many as the sitting ' sorry ' standing capacity of the ship without any luxury but just congested standing space in the ship) the holy icon personalities of the world either of just one religion or of all the regions.

Lets talk about the MYTHO CHARACTERS , NOT OUR FAV ACTORS:

# Whose ur most fav. & least fav. male character in Ramayan & MB and why??

# Whose ur most fav. & least fav. female characters in Ramayan & MB and why??

Here with MB i mean the Dwapar yug happenings .. both SK & MB !

Ramayan most favourite male character: Hanumanji (If he can be considered) ' reason not needed I think to be given.

Ramayan least favourite male character: Ravan ' harassed sages & cows despite being Brahmin himself, harassed devtas and navgrah, gave shelter to the demons all around the world, kidnapped Jagdamba Sitaji (easily got prompted by sister due to her kaam ' didn't try to check whether Shoorpankha is telling the truth or not), kicked the dharma-Vibhishan, dragged devotion 'Vibhishan out of home and country, sacrificed one by one brothers and all sons for own desire and ego and eventually to take their revenge and keep on holding his ego, still fought with God till the end. But also as per the mythological interpretations that he knew about Ram's truth and wanted the salvation by being killed by his hands only (Like Bhishma also happily got ready for that), I am happy with the Virodh bhakti explanation too as I have mentioned below in Kans' paragraph. In case of Kans, it was still the enmity without knowledge. In case of Ravan, it is even said that it was deliberate and with full knowledge of God (I mean Kans knew that Krishna was Vishnu but the intention was not there known and deliberate to be killed in the hands of God for the salvation).

MB/SK most favourite male character: Hanumanji again. 😊 If that doesn't count this time at least, then Gargaachaarya (Obviously you must have noticed that I have not considered Lord Krishna otherwise the answer was straight forward) ' Vairaagi, Knowledgeable, Anuraagi for God only and greatest of devotion and knowledge as it is portrayed in the serial.

MB/SK least favourite male character: Kans ' There couldn't be worse sinner than him in either of the epics ' I wonder why he was sparing Devaki with the justification that she was female and didn't suit to his bravery when he was killing helpless babies. And even worse, despite committing sin, he was so much coward and worried about death. But having said that, I don't have negative emotions for him. Emotions are neutral. The answer is only intellectual and not emotional just like Shoorpankha below. On the contrary, I get more irritated about Duryodhan since there are people in the world found who are Duryodhan and Kaurava's fans. We don't find any supporter of human actions of Kans so I happily take the Virodh Bhakti explanation for Kans.

Ramayan most favourite female character: If Sitaji can't be counted just like Ramji or Krishnaji, then Maa Tapasvini Shabari. Treasure of Devotion and Knowledge. Also got salvation and knowledge of devotion from God and God himself says that she didn't need that but still giving to please her.

Ramayan least favourite female character: Shoorpankha ' destroyer of own dynasty almost ' kaamaatur naari ' liar ' encourages her relatives and masters or king to commit the greatest of sins ' even worse, she wants to fulfill her own revengeful purpose but tempts Ravan for the wrong way of revenge too and wrong cause and she actually had no desire for her brother's marriage with the most beautiful woman in the world either but she lied over there. She wanted Sitaji's miseries and pleased brother by saying that she wished her brother's happiness. But that was destiny and also the character part of the plans of destiny. Big big important character. So it would be tough to say actually that she should be disliked by a knowledgeable person. And also she was attracted (passionately and in wrongful way though) to Ramji so that was also a character in a way of Virodh bhakti (Like Putna uddhar explanation). The answer could also have been Taadkaa but her role is purely that of demon and nothing to relate to human characteristics and also having smaller role than Shoorpankha, so intellectually dropped her choice.

MB/SK most favourite female character: If Rukminiji/Radhaji can't be counted just like Sitaji, then Devaki maiya. Tolerance, faith and patience. Despite having the softest of woman part in her, she also had guts to make the decision to call Krishna in order to save her husband ' She has demonstrated the greatest of balance in this dialog to Akrurji ' "Yadi wo bhagwan hai, to hame uski chinta karne ki koi aavashyakataa nahi. Aur yadi wo bhagwan nahi, tab bhi is dharm sankat ki ghadi me jab mujhe pati aur putra me se kisi ek ka balidan karna pada, to maine putra ka balidan karna hi mera dharm samjha" ' exact dialog Lola will easily quote. Even after being able to meet Krishna after so many years of wait, she had to show the maturity when Krishna was to be sent to Sandipani aashram, then to be sent alone with his brother to fight Jarasandh and then for most of the time Krishna was busy in his agenda of dharmasansthaapan at political level in Aaryaavart.

MB/SK least favourite female character: It could have been Putna due to the magnitude of her sin just like Kans, but RSji hasn't allowed that from his mythological explanation from Shrimad Bhagwatam. Just brings everything to balance. If the choice is to be made from more human characters (rather than Krityaa ' raakshasi through taantrik aahvaahan - or Shambharasur's wife and such), then it can be Amba ' as she over reacted and wrongly demanded to marry Bhishma when it was her own fault too when she was being kidnapped. Bhishma did wrong but she was late in telling the truth and Bhishma was clear from the beginning that he was kidnapping the princesses not for himself but for Vichitravirya. Despite knowing about Bhishma's oath, the revengeful wish she was having had no logical base or support. She didn't want to marry Vichitravirya and Shaalva rejected her. Bhishma didn't have the fault as much as she reacted. I don't like Gandhari's character as per BRC MB but like it as per SK (as I mentioned in my post in MB CC to you with reference to your debate topic).

Will be back again ... with another exam

Pakka. Eventually while finalizing, the answers became lengthy, as I also had to justify with reasons. But the most favourite - least favourite character choices are mostly intellectual only as you must have noticed rather than emotional. These epics with their mythological essence (that all the characters were part of divine plot and were to get spiritual upliftment in their own way) doesn't allow us really to make such choices emotionally. BRC MB is easier in this regard to make human choices of liked or disliked characters in normal way the way we can do in case of non-mytho serials.

I am finding problem with this formatting when I am copying to word, type my answers there and paste here. Your lines and my lines can't be distinguished in terms of colour and formatting like they are there in my word file.