first of all awesome topic Anisha ... 👏👏👏👏Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath
Wow, superb topic, Anisha!👏 Really in-depth.I think the only thing I can say about the topic is that it is the duty of a family member to correct the wrongs of the wrongdoer. Whether that well-wisher is one's parent, wife, or child, the person doing the wrong has a duty to listen, and the well-wisher has the duty to advise him on the correct path. Ram himself said Meghnad had to die, because he was supporting Ravan in his bad cause. To support a sin is the same as committing the sin, because you are not letting the person know that he is treading the path of wrong. Meghnad not only supported Ravan, he encouraged him in every action until the very end when he realized the truth, but by then it was too late and his advice went through empty ears. A son is supposed to be his father's friend and well-wisher, and a friend and well-wisher always criticizes the other when he is doing Adharma, and Meghnad failed as a son when it came to that aspect. Loyalty is a very vague term. One must know when to be loyal, and when to break away from one's family to save themselves from sin and ruin. Meghnad at least should have refused to help his father in his evil deeds, even if it meant death, because death at the hands of his father at least would have given him moksha, while going against God and supporting his father only brought him infame.Prahlad is a different story, because he did warn his father. Even though he was years younger than Meghnad....a mere child, he warned his father a countless number of times that hate towards Sri Hari would only bring him ruin, but Hiranyakashipu would not listen. Prahlada never supported his father in his actions, so no blame can be given to him like in Meghnad's case. Prahlada always went against his father and prayed to Sri Hari for grace and protection, and because of that, in the end, Hiranyakashipu was killed while Prahlada was spared and protected.Before anything else in life, one must support Dharma, because Dharma is God and God is Dharma. If Dharma means to support one's family, then one must support it unconditionally, while if Dharma means to go against one's family, they must do so like in Vibhishna's case, because that alone takes them to God.Hope I made sense and wasn't ranting unnecessarily.😳-Janu