I am disgusted and Apalled - LOCKED - Page 16

Created

Last reply

Replies

638

Views

41k

Users

67

Frequent Posters

382958 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: DramaholicVibes

Ooops..Maybe i just confused it more..

Yes the screenshot could of been taken way after..
But we won't know what was exactly written since the CC mod edited the post..
so who to believe? =S



Trina should still face the consquences, since she released Chandni's personal information. Person that played with photo shop needs to step forward.
Bazinga thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: DramaholicVibes

Ooops..Maybe i just confused it more..

Yes the screenshot could of been taken way after..
But we won't know what was exactly written since the CC mod edited the post..
so who to believe? =S



DB I don't think EXACT words are required here, the CC MOD then has said PERSONAL INFO, CLEARLY in the edited post do you really need the lucid details of the post? Isn't the offense of the guilty obvious enough? And its a member of DT who has written, GG has taken screen shots of the ACTUAL content that too JUST NOW, hopefully you are not thinking that GG has photoshopped the evidence and posted it in THIS thread.
Kindly stop complicating things than they already are, its a humble request. Now since the concerned DT has ACTUAL, AUTHENTIC and NOT TAMPERED evidence, we are hoping that the KNOWN culprits at least will be dealt with and be punished IMMEDIATELY.

nisha80 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
my doubt....if da screen shot is edited...why is Trina quite
isnt this fishy
this doesnt reduce her offense

Edited by nisha80 - 15 years ago
Bazinga thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Gossip Girl

People that are trying to accuse Zainab, then this is the same evidence. I just took the screen shot yet again. Also, I don't have the Avatar option enabled, hence trina1's old "avi" is visible.







You can search it again to check the evidence out.

I have another question as well. To me it appears that yes Trina did post all these messages. But what about the other girls involved in this? Weren't they encouraging this? They were asking about Sonia. I mean clearly Sonia was not Trina's friend. I was looking for the posts and apparently that day in the CC two members logged in and posted messages. The members in question are counter-attack and ever4ever. They both were banned, and Trina "assumed" it was IC members, so she decided to leak Chandni's information out. Note: I don't believe this still justifies what was done. I mean to me this establishes beyond anything that it was NOT at all "unintentional" in fact it was clearly intentional.





BRILLIANT WORK GG, you totally NAILED this 👏 I'd be APPALLED if the justice that is due to Chandni takes time now.
382958 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Kavya_KraZQueen



DB I don't think EXACT words are required here, the CC MOD then has said PERSONAL INFO, CLEARLY in the edited post do you really need the lucid details of the post? Isn't the offense of the guilty obvious enough? And its a member of DT who has written, GG has taken screen shots of the ACTUAL content that too JUST NOW, hopefully you are not thinking that GG has photoshopped the evidence and posted it in THIS thread.
Kindly stop complicating things than they already are, its a humble request. Now since the concerned DT has ACTUAL, AUTHENTIC and NOT TAMPERED evidence, we are hoping that the KNOWN culprits at least will be dealt with and be punished IMMEDIATELY.



@blue: I know eh. I posted the page numbers as well, since I had a feeling people wouldn't believe. The problem is that I'm using kproxy else I would have posted the original link as well. I might do in a few minutes, but anyway he can think that, cus ten minutes later when he catches the post in question he will be thinking "Hey, that GG person was honest!" :P :P
382958 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: Kavya_KraZQueen

@GG: Please PM this evidence you took just now to Global Mods, Jot, Mimi and Ravjot as well, it will be difficult n a waste of time for them to find it by reading through this thread.



Thanks, Kavya, I sent the PM to Jot :)
-dramaholic- thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 15 years ago
LOL I didn't say GG was lying.. Thanks for posting the links, that sure is something that will help the admins:)
psycho_angel thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
interesting...in this post,not just she mention the person's location,but indirectly bashes as well
[read the last line:or she is probably exfoliating...is she referring to the victim as a scaly reptile?]
isnt bashing members equal to violating one of the fundamental COCs of IFs?
and yes,an IP check would reveal the location of the person.guess trina1 did that.



this is scary behavior.the first page evidence may have been tampered with(i dunno for sure),but not this one.i took the screenshot from GGs link right now

Edited by mjhtac - 15 years ago
382958 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: mjhtac

interesting...in this post,not just she mention the person's location,but indirectly bashes as well
[read the last line:or she is probably exfoliating...is she referring to the victim as a scaly reptile?]
isnt bashing members equal to violating one of the fundamental COCs of IFs?
and yes,an IP check would reveal the location of the person.guess trina1 did that.



this is scary behavior.the first page evidence may have been tampered with(i dunno for sure),but not this one.i took the screenshot from GGs link right now



Exfoliation involves the removal of the oldest dead skin cells on the skin's outermost surface, and has been used for many years to help maintain the skin.

Yes, she is implying that Sonia has dead skin, as you mentioned Aditi that is a personal attack, plus she mentioned the name of a lot of members of IC (including NEMA? someone mentioned) I caught that on Page 52. The word friend in this case was sarcasm used to get away! I thought we had a role that we are not permitted to mention other members in CC, and no sarcasm or implying permitted. Apart from releasing personal information of a member there is a whole lot here.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".