Posted:
The celebrations which are being shown in the name of engagement is looking as if its Taani's marriage and not engagement, but still since its only dance and Puja's, they can be passed off and accepted easily.
But today they showed Swayam saying groom side sitting for "SAJJANKOT". Now this is definitely not a part of engagement. The "SAJJANKOT" is done after the marriage, in which all the grooms relatives and friends sit down along with the bride and the bride's side serve them.
They could have shown Swayam stating that they would serve the boy's side just as a gesture (the royal treatment which is usually given to the groom's side), but using the term which is associated after the wedding should have been avoided.
The CV's should be careful while showing all these. Shantannu being a Marwari must be aware of this, how come he did not pin-point such a big blunder, amazes me.
Udne Ki Aasha
Kumkum Bhagya
