... CGM under direct supervision ... but 'BHEJA'!

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

39

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#31

@rinku yeah i'd also read on net that sum scholars think chanyakya as of dravidian origin. its not only that aryans were allowed in early vedic period all ppl r allowed 2 leran & read vedas & i agree wid u that we've so many female rishis who even composed sum of vedic hymns like lopmudra, & sum were respected scholars like gargi & maitreyi but later on wen caste system bcame rigid it was restricted only 2 high caste males!!!

@jhum_86 i agree chanyakya was a brahmin but it doesn't mean dravidian ppl r not brahmins. as u know rahul dravid is a brahmin. and though historians think that sanskrit was not written until 6th BCE but theres 1 quesn that how cum such large collection of literature work like vedas, upnishadas, brahmanas r passed 2 nxt generations only verbally!!😕it really reqd as sum1'd said on sum oder site" super human memory"!!

Reply

Quote

Arunita Chandra

@RoseFairy

Dazzler

22

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#32

@jhum_86 i agree chanyakya was a brahmin but it doesn't mean dravidian ppl r not brahmins. as u know rahul dravid is a brahmin. and though historians think that sanskrit was not written until 6th BCE but theres 1 quesn that how cum such large collection of literature work like vedas, upnishadas, brahmanas r passed 2 nxt generations only verbally!!😕it really reqd as sum1'd said on sum oder site" super human memory"!!

ya they had a super human memmory....but the vedic literature came much after the first four vedas....so i think when the vedic litterature came the culture of writing had been introduced before them...and ya dravidian can be brahmin...but its only after the mixing of culture of arya and anaryas....but during the chanakya's time i guess the mixing didn't start ...brahmins and khatriyas both words were related to only aryans then...so i think there's a very least possibilities of chanakya being dravidian by orgin

Reply

Quote

neha mehra

@rinku4u

Dazzler

21

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

#33

Originally posted by: tiny15
@rinku yeah i'd also read on net that sum scholars think chanyakya as of dravidian origin. its not only that aryans were allowed in early vedic period all ppl r allowed 2 leran & read vedas & i agree wid u that we've so many female rishis who even composed sum of vedic hymns like lopmudra, & sum were respected scholars like gargi & maitreyi but later on wen caste system bcame rigid it was restricted only 2 high caste males!!!

@jhum_86 i agree chanyakya was a brahmin but it doesn't mean dravidian ppl r not brahmins. as u know rahul dravid is a brahmin. and though historians think that sanskrit was not written until 6th BCE but theres 1 quesn that how cum such large collection of literature work like vedas, upnishadas, brahmanas r passed 2 nxt generations only verbally!!😕it really reqd as sum1'd said on sum oder site" super human memory"!!

exactly .tin & aru di😊.. but i think they used 100 % of their brain .. which can do miracles (no pun intended). we use only 0.01 % of our grey matter can do remarkable inventions in 2des age . so i guess it could have been memorised if de used 100 % of it . & really de did miracles as we say now . but its nothing , just that they used 100% of their IQ

Edited by rinku4u - 14 years ago

1

Reply

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

39

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#34

Originally posted by: jhum_86

@jhum_86 i agree chanyakya was a brahmin but it doesn't mean dravidian ppl r not brahmins. as u know rahul dravid is a brahmin. and though historians think that sanskrit was not written until 6th BCE but theres 1 quesn that how cum such large collection of literature work like vedas, upnishadas, brahmanas r passed 2 nxt generations only verbally!!😕it really reqd as sum1'd said on sum oder site" super human memory"!!

ya they had a super human memmory....but the vedic literature came much after the first four vedas....so i think when the vedic litterature came the culture of writing had been introduced before them...and ya dravidian can be brahmin...but its only after the mixing of culture of arya and anaryas....but during the chanakya's time i guess the mixing didn't start ...brahmins and khatriyas both words were related to only aryans then...so i think there's a very least possibilities of chanakya being dravidian by orgin

u r rite abt chanyakya not a dravidian. but the theory of aryans cuming from outside is not v.much taken by many scholars now-a-days!! now if u read history books they don't think as aryans cuming from outside & dravidians from india & make both as not related.

now even foriegn scholars r also not buying this theory of aryan being outsiders!!😊

1

Reply

Quote

Moner_Radio

@Moner_Radio

Rocker

29

Posted: 14 years ago

#35

oh my god!!!! i'm going at all dis discussions!!! u ppl r simply ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️!! got to learn so many things from u 2day 😛😛 !!

Edited by polly_03 - 14 years ago

2

Reply

Quote

Moner_Radio

@Moner_Radio

Rocker

29

Posted: 14 years ago

#36

but cuming 2 d main point of dis thread, sagar's shud definately tk more cr of CGM 's vocabulary or it will b all 🤢 🤢🤢🤢of d show!! i mean even a show lyk Jhansi Ki Rani on Zee tv uses much more chaste hindi dan dis ,sumtyms more dan we can digest actually 😆😆😆& it 's abt an incident dat took place in 1857 den how cum CGM uses d common -man's hindi of d 21st century??? 😡😡

Edited by polly_03 - 14 years ago

Reply

Quote

Arunita Chandra

@RoseFairy

Dazzler

22

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#37

Originally posted by: tiny15

ya they had a super human memmory....but the vedic literature came much after the first four vedas....so i think when the vedic litterature came the culture of writing had been introduced before them...and ya dravidian can be brahmin...but its only after the mixing of culture of arya and anaryas....but during the chanakya's time i guess the mixing didn't start ...brahmins and khatriyas both words were related to only aryans then...so i think there's a very least possibilities of chanakya being dravidian by orgin

u r rite abt chanyakya not a dravidian. but the theory of aryans cuming from outside is not v.much taken by many scholars now-a-days!! now if u read history books they don't think as aryans cuming from outside & dravidians from india & make both as not related.

now even foriegn scholars r also not buying this theory of aryan being outsiders!!😊

ya ths is a very controversial theory still now....but many sources support that they were outsider...but we are not sure...anyways even if they were not outsider but still brahmin r only related to aryans...

Reply

Quote

Abhiram Rao

@Abhiram-

Dazzler

23

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

#38

@rinku4u.......i agree with u tht some words were not used in the time then.........but maybe some modern words were retained so as to make the Hindi used as simple as possible, and at the same time retaining the pure Hindi used.......

1

Reply

Quote

neha mehra

@rinku4u

Dazzler

21

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

#39

Originally posted by: nivren
@rinku4u.......i agree with u tht some words were not used in the time then.........but maybe some modern words were retained so as to make the Hindi used as simple as possible, and at the same time retaining the pure Hindi used.......

yes tiny dear😊 but the words which i pointed out are not pure hindi .its derived from Urdu . & that time Urdu was not dere 😊😊😊😊😊

Reply

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

39

+ 3

Posted: 14 years ago

#40

Originally posted by: rinku4u

yes tiny dear😊 but the words which i pointed out are not pure hindi .its derived from Urdu . & that time Urdu was not dere 😊😊😊😊😊

yeah u r rite sum of the words were of Urdu. but may b they r using 2 make it easy 4 the viewers!! or may b dialogue writers don't know the exact words so using urdu words!!😊

Reply

Quote

... CGM under direct supervision ... but 'BHEJA'! - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics