Evil predominence..but it is quite short lived

Page

siva06

@siva06

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

A classical episode

At the beginning of their relationship they felt completely in love, like nothing could come between the two of them.

They were living the romantic fantasy .But a lot of untoward events happened and their future seemed bleak with out any hope

Still now she has no evidence to put forth to prove her innocence..but always truth speaks

Chandra still loves(deep in his heart) and care for her.He has started to renew and revive their relationship, not for his son alone, for his own self also. Love is patient; love forgives

Though in a state of confusion ( always instigated by Helana),he has half belief in her. How tenderly he puts her in bed and covers her and admires her innocence...very very stirring and warming

Can you reason it out?No..he is in the process of improving, renewing and making something more beautiful

The confrontation between Acharya and CGM is quite dramatic.This is Acharya's show.

Rajat and Manoj set scene ablaze with their forceful and intense dialogues Even though Acharya is against her, the poor soul Nandini tries her best to mend their rift,but in vain for the goodness of magadh

Sudden departure of Acharya shocked every body and all blame Nandini, including Moora. Rajamatha threatened to leave the palace..but Chandra firmly asked her to stay for his own sake. Hurray!!!

Apama & party has gone to the extent of establishing Yavan Samrajya in Magadh with Mahasthanese as maha manthri.We were all hell shocked when Chandra Gupta Maurya endorsed the same consequently...

what a coincidence?

All the events run as predicted by Apama and that evil woman in her euphoria vouches to evacuate Nandini from the palace.Evil predominance..but it is quite short lived.

Edited by siva06 - 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

RTDeewani

@RTDeewani

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

Hi siva. I have been silently following your posts for a while now and I really appreciate the efforts that you put in to your posts, that is reflected by your beautifully woven words. I am surprised at how you manage to always keep a positivity regarding the episodes turning for good and logical, while most of us are fast losing hope and I am among those who is only putting up with it due to my love for RT's performance.

I have been noticing all this while that almost all are sure and say with conviction that the heated arguments between Chanakya and Chandra is just an act to expose Helena and Apama.

But I wonder that all this so-called plans of exposing could have been done a year back itself. We can't forget the fact that Chanakya did have a speck of doubt on H & A even then. And what made the light bulb glow after a year? And why would Chanakya even care to prove Nandni innocent, when he was no less than Helena in trying to keep Chandra away from Nandni as they were busy falling hard for each other?

Yes, it might be true that such an incident did happen in the real cgm's life where he was at loggerheads with Chanakya,only to be revealed later that it was all an act to expose something by the duo. but we know there's hardly history followed in the show. Therefore, I highly feel that these differences between them to be a real one.

And I am really confused at Chandra's gestures towards Nandni. No doubt he still loves her deeply, unbeknownst to him. But what is exactly his opinion about her with respect to Durdhara's murder?

If he firmly believes her to be the culprit, then the need for all these acts and secret planning never arises. And if he believes in her innocence, I dont get his need to hurt her with his venomous words even in the confines of their bedroom?

I wonder when will I get a clear picture of what is actually cooking up?

Once again a fantastic post, Siva. Keep this coming.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

siva06

@siva06

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

Fantastic and excellent..Vow.. beyond comprehension...Sangeeta.. what is life..let me take my breath...are we living in fantasy? what are the daring truths surrounding us

C & N are not angels straight from heaven. They are mere humans with all sorts of human frailties

Do really eyes speak?what is belief?

Belief is the state of mind in which a person thinks something to be the true, with or without there being external evidence to prove that something is that case with factual certainty.

Yes.. as you said... both are in the evolving process..but their circumstances and situations may retard their progress...but in the end truth gains..love will be sustained( I haven't seen a few good men movie.now searching in the net)i remember seeing the movie long ago.but again going thru..the young Tom Cruise and Demi Moore were in excellent forms

Do all wives are like Joe as in "sillunnu oru kaadhal" sending her husband to spend one day with his ex?

Edited by siva06 - 8 years ago

Quote

AshtaVasus

@AshtaVasus

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: siva06
Apama & party has gone to the extent of establishing Yavan Samrajya in Magadh with Mahasthanese as maha manthri.
We were all hell shocked when Chandra Gupta Maurya endorsed the same consequently... what a coincidence?

Isn't this exactly what i had written on your posts a few days back ???!!!!!!

Seleucus lost both his Indian Invasion war AND his daughter with Chandra. He had to return empty handed. He too was a warrior, who became King later.

Aparna was Seleucus's favourite Queen (so she claims), and it doesn't sit well with her seeing her husband in shame and losing her own daughter as well to Indian soil.

What her husband could not get through direct means, Aparna tries through indirect means. Even if it means, manipulating her own daughter...

Helena, as such, is a power hungry woman, who wanted everything under her control. She was commanding people even when she was just a mere Warrior's daughter in Alexander army. Naturally, when she became Queen of Magadh, the hunger for Authority and Power only increased multifold.

She even wanted to become Rajmata of Magadh (remember, the conversation that Moora and Helena had in the beginning) - This Hunger for Power is exactly what Aparna manipulates to get what she wants. A mother knows her daughter well, isn't it ?

Aparna wants Helena to get a heir through Chandra - so that indirectly the Yavan Samrajya is established in India. Helena was NOT in love with Chandra at all. Aparna manipulated her and made her focus on that issue, repeatedly increasing her jealousy against Nandini, right from the beginning.

(This is exactly what Chanakya feared and predicted, when he directed Chandra to have a heir through Durdhara first, even though she may be his Second Wife).

Its the same Rajniti that Rajputs employed against Mughals later. Mughal invaded India. Rajputs married their princesses to Mughals, diluted the bloodline and brought it back to Hindus.

When Shahjahan approached his mother Jagat Gosain regarding his marraige with Mumtaz, he was apprehensive that his mother will not approve. He asked whether she would be ok if he, a Muslim, married another Muslim. In reply, Jagat Gosain said "You are a Hindu actually. But its ok if you marry a Muslim". Shahjahan was surprised. How can he be a Hindu ? Jagat replies "Your father Jehangir aka Salim, was born to Akbar and Jodha (a Rajput princess). So he was Half Hindu. And you are born to Jehangir and me Jagat Gosain (Full Hindu). So, 75% of your DNA is Hindu".

Edited by rajatshweta - 8 years ago

Quote

siva06

@siva06

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

Isn't this exactly what i had written on your posts a few days back ???!!!!!!

Seleucus lost both his Indian Invasion war AND his daughter with Chandra. He had to return empty handed. He too was a warrior, who became King later.

Aparna was Seleucus's favourite Queen (so she claims), and it doesn't sit well with her seeing her husband in shame and losing her own daughter as well to Indian soil.

What her husband could not get through direct means, Aparna tries through indirect means. Even if it means, manipulating her own daughter...

Helena, as such, is a power hungry woman, who wanted everything under her control. She was commanding people even when she was just a mere Warrior's daughter in Alexander army. Naturally, when she became Queen of Magadh, the hunger for Authority and Power only increased multifold.

She even wanted to become Rajmata of Magadh (remember, the conversation that Moora and Helena had in the beginning) - This Hunger for Power is exactly what Aparna manipulates to get what she wants. A mother knows her daughter well, isn't it ?

Aparna wants Helena to get a heir through Chandra - so that indirectly the Yavan Samrajya is established in India. Helena was NOT in love with Chandra at all. Aparna manipulated her and made her focus on that issue, repeatedly increasing her jealousy against Nandini, right from the beginning.
(This is exactly what Chanakya feared and predicted, when he directed Chandra to have a heir through Durdhara first, even though she may be his Second Wife).

Its the same Rajniti that Rajputs employed against Mughals later. Mughal invaded India. Rajputs married their princesses to Mughals, diluted the bloodline and brought it back to Hindus.
When Shahjahan approached his mother Jagat Gosain regarding his marraige with Mumtaz, he was apprehensive that his mother will not approve. He asked whether she would be ok if he, a Muslim, married another Muslim. In reply, Jagat Gosain said "You are a Hindu actually. But its ok if you marry a Muslim". Shahjahan was surprised. How can he be a Hindu ? Jagat replies "Your father Jehangir aka Salim, was born to Akbar and Jodha (a Rajput princess). So he was Half Hindu. And you are born to Jehangir and me Jagat Gosain (Full Hindu). So, 75% of your DNA is Hindu".

I won't go thru any of the postings here,bcoz it may disturb my thoughts on RT and CN..but I read each and every line of your postings thoroughly like a school child going for history exam

I remember your lines on Selucus and thought it as a sort of satire OK..Apama tries to establish a Greek kingdom here.She wants a heir thru CGM..but he adamantly refuses to yield .

Plz answer my question?

So you say helena is not in love with Chandra ? simply wants a heir? Then why so much of jealousy? They may try to murder Bindusaar also.So N and B are so vulnerable? and again a murder charge?

Quote

Evil predominence..but it is quite short lived

Related Topics

Explore Topics