we feel angry towards society

The the incident of trying to molest Nandini is to be condemned strongly

Nandini is warrior princess..she knows her self defence

and is a strong willed queen capable of fighting against the atrocities of

women pathetically fights for her chastity

No women on earth should undergo this much of humiliation,sexual assault and abuse under the very eyes of her loving husband

Bottomline is women are not safe in any era; it is a thorny day to day issues

Witches like Helana have their places in society with high esteem

So Chandra Gupta maurya is the only boss around to act as the saviour of women

A continuous remembrance of his exiled wife always torments him

The fact that his loving wife suffering in the hands of a stranger is intriguing, disgusting and disturbing.

But, we have seen this happening

I feel angry towards the great Chandra Gupta Maurya.

We admire and respect the versality of Rajat and he is a superb spontaneous actor

But we feel some inadequacy in him in this separation track.

Originally posted by: pinky_rajatfan

I agree with u completely on this Siva..nandini is shown so much helpless in this separation track..she is the same girl who arrived in the battle ground to save her father and fought with her father for her husband...what are the CV up to...it was pathetic to watch nandini being nearly raped..and too the girl who is Chandra's nandini.

Chandra on the other hand has believed that nandini killed dur..just because all proofs were against her..but what about his trust??? He told her to get out from the kingdom but what her safety that did not bother him???

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

Yes, there is too much inconsistency in CGM characterisation.

Initial stages of his marriage, he constantly doubted her for everything and then would come back and apologise to her later.

Later, he started confronting her saying Maun Mat Raho, say the truth of your side before I pass my judgement.

Then, he started really trusting her blindly. To that extent, when the entire family was against Nandini during Chhaya abortion, and Chandra himself was fighting for his life after drinking poison (which was prepared by Nandini incidentally). he passed the Jeev Samadhi judgement, but kept her hidden safely, because HE TRUSTED HER.

When Chanakya was blaming Nandini for poisoning Durdhara (which was prepared by Nandini again) he just went away with Nandini because HE TRUSTED HER.

Durdhara was fighting for her life since then. All of a sudden he spots Nandini in Durdhara's bed, giving her water, and Durdhara's letter stating the word Sauten, he instantly believes That Nandini is the murderer. TRUST VANISHES SUDDENLY. Huge gap here.

The same guy who learnt, When Durdhara fell down from stairs, that just because the oil came from Nandini's room, it doesn't mean that she did it. The same guy now believes that just because he saw Nandini giving water to a Durdhara doesn't mean that she poisoned it.

Last one year, it didn't occur to him even once, that Durdhara had 2 Sauten, and that she always favoured Nandini and was always scared of Helena.

It was Durdhara who kept prodding Chandra to confess his love for Nandini often.

It was durdhara who kept on asking Nandini to be her child's mom - even in front of Chandra.

It was Durdhara who was happy to see Chandra taking Nandini side when he chose to go away from the Mahal.

It was Helena who arm twisted Chandra to give up Nandini, and forced him to give her a child. She even waged war against him through her father. With Durdhara and her child gone, it would have opened opportunity for her as well. And this fact doesn't get noticed by Chandra for last one year that she COULD be the culprit !! And for mastermind Chanakya as well ?!?!

Last time when Nandini was being walled alive, Daadi came and created such a big scene. This time, she simply said I can't believe that Nandini did this. And last one whole year, she chose not to approach Chandra and talk this matter at all.

Moora mistook Nandini twice for revengeful Nandputri (during her birthday and Chandra poison) and realised her mistake later. It didn't strike her also that something amiss in the whole scene, for so long.

Chandra had gone on war for last one year. But Moora and Daadi and Chanakya would have sensed what's happening inside the Andhapuram and Rajya, post Nandini's exit.

One year passed and he is back to Ghrina word against Nandini today. This sudden Ghrina and sudden vanishing of trust is not properly justified by showing convincing scenes by the CVs. CVs just dropped us viewers in mid air.

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

Yes, there is too much inconsistency in CGM characterisation.

Initial stages of his marriage, he constantly doubted her for everything and then would come back and apologise to her later.

Later, he started confronting her saying Maun Mat Raho, say the truth of your side before I pass my judgement.

Then, he started really trusting her blindly. To that extent, when the entire family was against Nandini during Chhaya abortion, and Chandra himself was fighting for his life after drinking poison (which was prepared by Nandini incidentally). he passed the Jeev Samadhi judgement, but kept her hidden safely, because HE TRUSTED HER.

When Chanakya was blaming Nandini for poisoning Durdhara (which was prepared by Nandini again) he just went away with Nandini because HE TRUSTED HER.

Durdhara was fighting for her life since then. All of a sudden he spots Nandini in Durdhara's bed, giving her water, and Durdhara's letter stating the word Sauten, he instantly believes That Nandini is the murderer. TRUST VANISHES SUDDENLY. Huge gap here.

The same guy who learnt, When Durdhara fell down from stairs, that just because the oil came from Nandini's room, it doesn't mean that she did it. The same guy now believes that just because he saw Nandini giving water to a Durdhara doesn't mean that she poisoned it.

Last one year, it didn't occur to him even once, that Durdhara had 2 Sauten, and that she always favoured Nandini and was always scared of Helena.

It was Durdhara who kept prodding Chandra to confess his love for Nandini often.

It was durdhara who kept on asking Nandini to be her child's mom - even in front of Chandra.

It was Durdhara who was happy to see Chandra taking Nandini side when he chose to go away from the Mahal.

It was Helena who arm twisted Chandra to give up Nandini, and forced him to give her a child. She even waged war against him through her father. With Durdhara and her child gone, it would have opened opportunity for her as well. And this fact doesn't get noticed by Chandra for last one year that she COULD be the culprit !! And for mastermind Chanakya as well ?!?!

Last time when Nandini was being walled alive, Daadi came and created such a big scene. This time, she simply said I can't believe that Nandini did this. And last one whole year, she chose not to approach Chandra and talk this matter at all.

Moora mistook Nandini twice for revengeful Nandputri (during her birthday and Chandra poison) and realised her mistake later. It didn't strike her also that something amiss in the whole scene, for so long.

Chandra had gone on war for last one year. But Moora and Daadi and Chanakya would have sensed what's happening inside the Andhapuram and Rajya, post Nandini's exit.

One year passed and he is back to Ghrina word against Nandini today. This sudden Ghrina and sudden vanishing of trust is not properly justified by showing convincing scenes by the CVs. CVs just dropped us viewers in mid air.

1. attacks magadh,
2. murders Chanakya and apamadadi and moora
   
3. keeps helena as his patrani ,she will accept if he promises for shishu
4. puts chandragupt behind bars for life
   
5. and get back nandini's lost honour.
6. she is better to remain as father's daughter rather than doubting Hubby's wife
7. serial ends