Chandra Nandini 61-70: Mrigtrishna? - Page 12

No, Lavanya, I think we are in for a lot of fun as Roopa does a lovey dovey act with Chandra, and he does not know how to take it!😉 Last night's episode - with him ending up as Nandini's teddy bear 😉- gave a strong indication of how he is going to start melting pretty soon. So he would be like putty in the hands of a cheeky, aggressive Roopa, whom he would of course assume to be Nandini.

That is not the real issue The real issue is what on earth Sunanda is aiming for. I think she wants to get rid of Chandra - remember the highly disapproving look on her face as Nandini is rejoicing when Chandra recovers consciousness? . So she must be planning to use Roopa to seduce him first and then bump him off.

Of course the Sunanda-Aapama duo would first have to get Nandini out of the way first for this to work.

Now Sunanda cannot reveal this real motive to Aapama, who does not want Chandra dead, quite the opposite, but does want Nandini to vanish from the scene. So Sunanda will have to tell her a cooked up story about a quite different yojana.What will that be? Question No. 1.

What of the cheroot smoking Roopa? She will hardly be a pliable puppet for keeps. She might fall for Chandra herself, like Helena and Nandini, and then she might want to simply replace Nandini in Chandra's life for keeps, and let Sunanda go to the blazes. Question No.2.

How did Roopa materialise anyway? Is she a twin sister of Nandini's, which is totally implausible in the case of a royal birth with the doctors and the maids and the soldiers around, as Anne (AJSharma79) had pointed out earlier, stressing than Nandini was born outside the palace, when Avantika was returning from somewhere. It would have been impossible for Sunanda, who was not there then, to have smuggled one baby out without running a huge risk.

Or is she a lookalike that Sunanda has chanced upon somewhere, like Maham Anga stumbling upon her own lookalike Lakhi? This is more plausible. She could then have kept her hidden all this while, planning to palm her off on Nand some day as a twin of Nandini's. Whence her constant references to a great secret that he would desperately want to know. Question No. 3.

I suppose Roopa's identity would be revealed when she cannot tackle any of Nandini's high level pustakein!

Well, these three Qs are enough to be going on for the moment. I will try and think of some more soon, and so can you! Did I not say it would be fun?

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: AJSharma79

And his 'she should have left in the morning' after dadi asked where Nandini was...oh, when will he stop being such a child with nappy rash? He is stupid, undignifie and plain insuferable in his treatment of Nandini. What does he expect her to do? Sit around for him to toss her about like trash? Everyone seems to have forgotten she was brought up a princess...a very loved one at that. She would have never had to bow to anyone or treated ill by anyone. The fact that she had been so docile at every turn with him, should speak volumes. But no! He is cranky and annoying like a baby with a sore butt...and he is driving me up the wall

Originally posted by: BabyHimavari

@bold... aunty at the moment I really couldn't hold my nerve and want to smack chandu's head in anger.. I was like hello mahnnn, you yourself told your wife to leave the palace at the mid of night and you are expecting her to wait their for morning?!😕😕...Any woman with dignity and self respect won't be doing so... this chandu 2 is seriously heights of dumbness sometimes...

Originally posted by: sashashyam

You must be right about the potli, my dear Amina, and Chandra must have brought that stuff and the mudra back with him.

It is not just that Nandini now has no ego where he is concerned. It is also that she sees that bag of mudra as something of his given to her, a memento, that she wants to keep forever.That is really why she does not refuse to take it.

But his behaviour then is so atrocious that I wanted to clout him. What kind of man would do this to his wedded wife, asking her to leave her home for good in the middle of the night? What if she had been carried off by bandits and sold as a slave? And he has the gall to stand around later arguing with himself that he had done the right thing.

Not just that, later, when he is faced with daadi's demand for Nandini, he exclaims with exasperation that she should have left in the morning!😡He deserves to be kicked with hobnailed boots all the way to Takshashila for such despicable behaviour.

Shyamala Aunty

My dear (what is your name, if you do not mind?),

It was you who made my day with this crisp and very flattering comment. Thank YOU!

Shyamala Aunty (or Di, whichever is age appropriate seeing that I am well over 60)

Originally posted by: sashashyam

No, Lavanya, I think we are in for a lot of fun as Roopa does a lovey dovey act with Chandra, and he does not know how to take it!😉 Last night's episode - with him ending up as Nandini's teddy bear 😉- gave a strong indication of how he is going to start melting pretty soon. So he would be like putty in the hands of a cheeky, aggressive Roopa, whom he would of course assume to be Nandini.

MORE HAMAM SCENES...yaay!!

That is not the real issue The real issue is what on earth Sunanda is aiming for. I think she wants to get rid of Chandra - remember the highly disapproving look on her face as Nandini is rejoicing when Chandra recovers consciousness? . So she must be planning to use Roopa to seduce him first and then bump him off. This makes sense of course, as any Nand clan would only aim to rid of Maurya clan

Of course the Sunanda-Aapama duo would first have to get Nandini out of the way first for this to work. On Aapama part it makes sense to get rid of Nandini, but on Sunanda part - unless she is planning to dethrone Chand and she plonks herself there, i dont understand what she wants. Because ditching Nandini will not sit well with Nand, the only surviving male of the clan to reclaim the throne if Sunanda suceeds.

Now Sunanda cannot reveal this real motive to Aapama, who does not want Chandra dead, quite the opposite, but does want Nandini to vanish from the scene. So Sunanda will have to tell her a cooked up story about a quite different yojana.What will that be? Question No. 1.

I will help you to rid of Nandini if you will speak to your daughter and get me back my bigger room?

What of the cheroot smoking Roopa? She will hardly be a pliable puppet for keeps. She might fall for Chandra herself, like Helena and Nandini, and then she might want to simply replace Nandini in Chandra's life for keeps, and let Sunanda go to the blazes. Question No.2.

At this point, Sunanda will do a reverse Roopa and bring back Nandini; at which point the already confused, confounded and dumb bounded Chandra will have his head spinning so fast on his shoulders he will not even be able to say Aacharya straight

How did Roopa materialise anyway? Is she a twin sister of Nandini's, which is totally implausible in the case of a royal birth with the doctors and the maids and the soldiers around, as Anne (AJSharma79) had pointed out earlier, stressing than Nandini was born outside the palace, when Avantika was returning from somewhere. It would have been impossible for Sunanda, who was not there then, to have smuggled one baby out without running a huge risk.

I think Roopa is Sunanda-Nand love child or Nand-Dasi X love child; though the latter is more plausible. Fearing the wrath of Avantika, Nand probably had never told her about this baby whom he had given to Sunand to get rid of. Of course, Sunanda would not have done so. So here were are ...

Or is she a lookalike that Sunanda has chanced upon somewhere, like Maham Anga stumbling upon her own lookalike Lakhi? This is more plausible. She could then have kept her hidden all this while, planning to palm her off on Nand some day as a twin of Nandini's. Whence her constant references to a great secret that he would desperately want to know. Question No. 3.

Chancing upon a lookalike - i dont that would have gotten Nand shaking in his pants. It must be his love child, aunty. Just imagine Nandini finding out that her great PitaMaharaj had an affair...oh, can you hear the wind, the waves and the birds and other stuff coming to a still?

I suppose Roopa's identity would be revealed when she cannot tackle any of Nandini's high level pustakein!

or by her bad cheerot breath.

Well, these three Qs are enough to be going on for the moment. I will try and think of some more soon, and so can you! Did I not say it would be fun? Fun means only one thing - HAMAM scene...yaay!

Shyamala Aunty

I liked it a lot, and I have commented on it. It is another matter that my comments are longer than your post!😆

Shyamala Aunty

???? Ignore what ?

You are all getting naughtier by the moment, but remember that if you go too far, I have a trusty belan with which to get you kids back to the straight and narrow!😉

Right now, where is my Sandhya? She is the resident hamaam aficionada!😉

Shyamala Aunty

Sunanda was married to Nand, silly, so where does the notion of their having a love child arise? Not that there could ever have been much love between them!😆

And of course Sunanda would never want to get rid if Nandini, no way. Pita maharaj would execute her on the spot if he even got a whiff of that idea! Unless she plans to replace Nandini by Roopa on a permanent basis and control her from behind the scenes (always a tricky proposition at the best of times).

I am waiting to see what story she palms Aapama off with, and how these two cobras deal with each other.

Shyamala Aunty