Pros and Cons of CN serial

Page

Next Last

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Cons

1) Repeated story - its same story in every serial repeated again here. Nothing new and surprising

2) No historical theme at all - Chandra Nandini has not even one historical theme. Its all saas bahu saga. Atleast JA had a few like Adhams death, Marriage age drama etc But here since Nnad lost there is not a single historical story all saas- bahu drama

3) Queens acting stupid - Dhurudhara acting child like always

4) Queen acting non royal and vamp - Nandini

5) No gripping story that can attract a viewer to an admirer or fanatic

6) Direction is bad leaves lot to be desired. And so is story line.

7) Chandra too much dominated by Chankya

8) Helena and Malay and Nnadini step mom making fool of CGM an emperor

9) Helena dominating and misbehaving with Chandra too much

10) No good supporting characters and supporting parallel story's

Pros

1) Actors are very good

2) Sets are good

Edited by myviewprem - 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

@su_94

Sparkler

Posted: 8 years ago

i think u r 4th point was meant to b Helena but u mentioned Dur 😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

krithika

@Krithzz

Stunner

Posted: 8 years ago

Am keeping logic aside and enjoying actors and Chandini 😳

Quote

amina1

@amina1

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

Prem it's better to put our brain aside and enjoy the entertainment

Quote

swriter

@swriter

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

I have one question dear . Why does his all Queens use to call him " tum" or " Chandra kaha gaya hain" etc.
Means yaar he is their husband and I know in India still woman use respective words like " aap " for her husband.
So no doubt in that era and uss par bhi vo king ho toda respect to karati hogi .
I m sorry, I don't want to hurt anyone.
But itana logic to ekta mata ko dekhana padega.
For God sake vo king hain wives se thoda respect dilvado 😆

Quote

Tanulovesrt

@Tanulovesrt

Beginner

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: swriter
I have one question dear . Why does his all Queens use to call him " tum" or " Chandra kaha gaya hain" etc.
Means yaar he is their husband and I know in India still woman use respective words like " aap " for her husband.
So no doubt in that era and uss par bhi vo king ho toda respect to karati hogi .
I m sorry, I don't want to hurt anyone.
But itana logic to ekta mata ko dekhana padega.
For God sake vo king hain wives se thoda respect dilvado 😆

Not only because he's a king so they shouldn't call him by his name but in that era no woman took her husband's name. I cannot understand why they are ignoring all these things.

Quote

Sanju

@.Karna

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

Well...i disagree with some points .

Durdhara is immature ...but you cannot call her stupid ...dont know about others ...but for me ,she is adorable ..way too adorable..if i would get a chance to choose btw these three ...then i would choose durdhara for sure ...i dont want my wife to be my love ( vese bhi me itna kismat vala nhi hoon😛 ) ...i want my wife to be my best friend .

And i dont have any problem with 'chanakya dominating chandra' ...haan chanakya jab sabke samne dominate karta hai to thoda illogical lagta hai ki , ek emperor se izzat se baat karni chahiye aur ye hai ki ...par yahan to uski patniyaan bhi izzat nhi deti ...'tu' 'tu' karke baat karti hain ...us era me esa nhi hota tha tha ...chalo if not as a husband ...but as a king to izzat se baat karni chahiye ...yahan helena sabse yuhi puchti rehti hai ki " hey chandra kahan hai " .

Par main baat to yahi thi ki , chandra har baat manta tha chankya ki ...aur sare decision bhi unke decisions pe lete they ...par actually har king esa hi karta hai ..vo hamesa apne mahamantri ya chief advisor ki baat mante they ...unless vo biased ya gusse me ho to , kuch bhi kar dete the...aur vese raja jyada tike nhi

Khud bhagwaan ram ne bhi sita ji ko tabhi vanvas bheja jab unke guru ne kaha , jo chief advisor they unke , usse se pehle kitno ne hi mana kiya ya hami bhari ...khud bhi nhi chahte the ...par guru ke kehne pe final decision ho gaya .

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: shubhaR
i think u r 4th point was meant to b Helena but u mentioned Dur 😆

i love durudhara so much shes fresh air in stale envin 😆

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: swriter
I have one question dear . Why does his all Queens use to call him " tum" or " Chandra kaha gaya hain" etc.
Means yaar he is their husband and I know in India still woman use respective words like " aap " for her husband.
So no doubt in that era and uss par bhi vo king ho toda respect to karati hogi .
I m sorry, I don't want to hurt anyone.
But itana logic to ekta mata ko dekhana padega.
For God sake vo king hain wives se thoda respect dilvado 😆

yes

dhurudhara is fine childhood friend

other too acting as if chandu was their chaddi buddy 😭😲

Quote

myviewprem

@myviewprem

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: .Karna
Well...i disagree with some points .
Durdhara is immature ...but you cannot call her stupid ...dont know about others ...but for me ,she is adorable ..way too adorable..if i would get a chance to choose btw these three ...then i would choose durdhara for sure ...i dont want my wife to be my love ( vese bhi me itna kismat vala nhi hoon😛 ) ...i want my wife to be my best friend .
And i dont have any problem with 'chanakya dominating chandra' ...haan chanakya jab sabke samne dominate karta hai to thoda illogical lagta hai ki , ek emperor se izzat se baat karni chahiye aur ye hai ki ...par yahan to uski patniyaan bhi izzat nhi deti ...'tu' 'tu' karke baat karti hain ...us era me esa nhi hota tha tha ...chalo if not as a husband ...but as a king to izzat se baat karni chahiye ...yahan helena sabse yuhi puchti rehti hai ki " hey chandra kahan hai " .

Par main baat to yahi thi ki , chandra har baat manta tha chankya ki ...aur sare decision bhi unke decisions pe lete they ...par actually har king esa hi karta hai ..vo hamesa apne mahamantri ya chief advisor ki baat mante they ...unless vo biased ya gusse me ho to , kuch bhi kar dete the...aur vese raja jyada tike nhi

Khud bhagwaan ram ne bhi sita ji ko tabhi vanvas bheja jab unke guru ne kaha , jo chief advisor they unke , usse se pehle kitno ne hi mana kiya ya hami bhari ...khud bhi nhi chahte the ...par guru ke kehne pe final decision ho gaya .

Dhurudhara is my fav too

any man would want wife like dhurudhara when he returns tired from war field or court

but chankya like i said dominating too much and bordering on misbehaviour

why he dare not misbehave with malayketu his other disciple

just because chandra respect him do not take undue advantage

i do not think others kings PMs dominated them like a chankya to chandra

No minister or PM dare speak like that to a emperor especially in front of others

And hitting in cane was limit

Do you think maham, bairam khan dare hit akbar their disciple in cane after he is big 20-25 years old no ways or any emperor for that matter 😕