Chandra Nandini 23-25: Helen 2.0 - Page 12

Created

Last reply

Replies

197

Views

16.4k

Users

25

Likes

601

Frequent Posters

sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
Since you are not coming back for 2 days, my dear Ranjana, I could take my time over this, but I wanted to respond before I move to another thread tomorrow.

To say that the eternal spirit of an ancient and spiritually powerful country like India roots for amar prem is pure balderdash. As a people, we are highly suspicious of any such emotions that escape from the pages of Kalidasa or the like and enter real life. 😉

Our marriages are,even today, over 70% vyapaari, to borrow EBM's line, and in those days it was 100%. In particular, we would never have approved of our girls experimenting with such dangerous things. Just look at the way the arranged marriage system is touted in innumerable films. What does it have to do with any kind of prem?

This amar prem nonsense has even less place in a king's life, which should focus on war, empire building, and then good governance.

I do not know for how long Chandra will keep up some semblance of independence from this corrupting sentiment, but the day he begins his marshmallow left out in the sun act is the day I quit this show. I have had enough of that in Jodha Akbar and I am not going to tolerate any more of it. At least Jodha was really beautiful, something that this female, with her insufferable corkscrew curls, is not.😆

Ah yes, I will make it a point to read that article. It sounds very promising!

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: kautilya04

Btw aunty, you must read this enjoyable article. I'd shared it in the Naamkaran forum some time ago. The write-up is hilarious and enlightening😆.

http://www.arre.co.in/culture/the-secret-diary-of-a-saas-bahu-writer-indian-daily-soaps-television/

Returning to the show, I have some doubts that I'm going to share quickly. Going by some lines in your previous posts, I'm guessing one of the main themes of the show is heart versus mind' or some balderdash of that sort. I'm confused about who is supposed to represent what. From what I understand, neither Helena nor Chandra lack Dils. If anything, both are driven by powerful emotions, albeit dissimilar ones. And they are using their brains to achieve objectives set out by the heart, which, I think, is a pretty dandy and sensible thing to do. What is supposed to be the opposite of that (as represented by Nandini, I assume)? Using your heart to look for ways to achieve what your brain wants?😕😆 That is not the heart's area of expertise. In fact, that is a highly certified recipe for disaster😆.

Or is EBM rooting for amar prem? Because that is what the eternal spirit of an ancient and spiritually powerful country like India roots for?😆 For two specific people to fall in love, get married, produce children and live happily until one of them kicks the bucket? Or finds another soulmate? God, the only way I'll be able to tolerate EMB's malarkey is if she clarifies that she is not touting the cause of eternal love, but of the two main characters - Amar and Prem - in that awesome movie Andaaz Apna Apna. That would be a lot more understandable and acceptable as far as I'm concerned😆.

Now I'm going to vanish again, and will try to be back within two days :)

Durgeshnandini thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: BabyHimavari

BTW adwitiya... I loved your username... "Durgeshnandini"... another historical delight by Bankimchandra Chatterji... I guess after sharadindu babu... it was only his historicals and Abanindranath Tagore's Raajkahini which also fascinates me to some extent(its sad that there is a void of historcial fiction in bengali literature apart from these few gems)... I remember i tried to read Durgeshnandini while i was in 6th std but quited due to his utterly pure Tatsama Bengali pronouncr...😆... I read that ltr...

It took me 3 installments and few explanations from the references to understand what I was reading 😆. But last time I read Durgeshnandini, I managed to do so without any assistance and I truly enjoyed what I read 😊... so Durgeshnandini is my favourite too!
disha15 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
Do I see Ranjana di in the thread? 😲 Di,I have followed your Prithvi fanfic like a bhakt! 😆
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
Now this is a very interesting, but largely derailed take on Helena, my dear Ranjana.

For I was not seeking your views on how the CVs are trying, insidiously and at times openly, to boost Nandini and downgrade and criticise Helena. The firangi aurat subtext is always there, and at times in your face. I am not surprised by this, and in fact I had expected it.

But I do not think the suhaag raat scene, which developed in such a delightfully unexpected manner, was written so from the firangi aurat angle . It was rather to stress that there is no amar prem behind their marriage, plus her fixation on her revenge. For us, such a thirst for revenge is acceptable only in a Draupadi or an Amba. And of course in a Nandini.

What I had wanted to know was your views on Helena as she has been shown to us, as a character.

For one thing, I do not agree that it is every woman's ambition to be a man's soulmate. It never was mine; I was, am, and will be my own person. I can offer empathy and support and affection, loyalty and love, but I do not want to share my soul with anyone or get a part of anyone else's!😉 This approach has worked very well for me.

I do not see Helena having any such soulmate ambitions either. I agree with your interpretation that the riverside scene was like the owner of a sports team bolstering the confidence of the favourite/star player after a crushing defeat in a match. But, to me at least, it did not seem as if that was all that there was to it. There was genuine protectiveness and genuine caring, for him, not for his ultimate victory.

Why would Chandra seek her company when he is downcast? He is guilt-ridden, and he wants to crawl into a hole and pull it in after him or, as he says, run away.

I had hoped that you would expand on or discuss my key point, which of course no one else here has even thought about (sometimes I wonder why I waste my time on these posts) : that Helena somehow has the ability to get thru to even such an introverted and remote individual as Chandra.

He has hardly spent much time with her; it is not like his guru who has moulded and shaped him for a decade. How then is she able to coax Chandra out of his depression?

How is it that, as I had specifically pointed out, such an alpha male has no problem with exposing all his weaknesses in front of this girl? That too one he hardly knows? It is unheard of!

These are the real psychologically interesting questions that I had hoped you would look into. I still hope that you will do that.

Not what the CVs are plotting against Helena and in favour of the tiresome, stupid Nandini. As for my take on the latter as she is at present, do take a look at my interim response to Ankita above!😉 There is also some stuff about Helena there that might interest you.

Let us see what Helena is about by the time you resurface. Bye for now, my dear. You are an original, and a perennial source of genuine amusement for me, for which I thank you!

Shyamala Aunty


Originally posted by: kautilya04

@sashashyam

Auntyjiii, I finished a crucial bit of the work last night, and so my dimaag gave itself permission to chill out for a short while😆. Logged in here and read your reply. It has prompted me to type a looong reply.

Arre auntyjii, I am notorious for my nautanki here, there and everywhere😆. Don't believe me? Oh... you do😳😆. Right then. Err...let's move on...😆

Oh yes, I forgot to mention the photo in my previous reply. It is perfect😃. That was the precise moment that caught my attention😆

I'm glad you feel I might have something worthwhile to contribute regarding Helena. I have my doubts😆. But a couple of points did occur to me while I watched some scenes and then read your lovely post, though they are based on my instinctive feelings about the thought-processes of the CVs rather than an analysis of the character and her actions. First, I'll share my current thoughts on the overall depiction of the character, which are based mainly on your posts since I've only watched 3 episodes so far, quickly before my conscience hauls me away.

The writing with respect to Chandra-Helena has been good. But the tenor of the writing, including Ekta's Bharat Mata's (who shall henceforth be referred to as EBM in my posts because I cannot let that feckless mind and voice even pretend to be the real thing🤢) preposterous vishesh tippanis, is obvious and off-putting.

While I don't feel any empathy or affection for the character yet, Helena is undeniably tough. She can think coolly, act bravely, make intelligent plans, and she doesn't let emotional weakness come in the way once her mind is made. Hence, she is a good partner in war, but but but but she is unworthy of qualifying as a man's soul-mate, which is what every woman aspires to be😆. As you've mentioned, if these same qualities had been depicted in a man in any show, he would have been deemed an alpha male, born to be drooled over😆.

The few Chandra-Helena scenes I've watched so far, even the ones that are outwardly positive, give me a feeling the CVs are going to great trouble to show that Helena's interest in Chandra is by and large tactical, with the foundation of respect and a sprinkling of affection. In the post-defeat scene, Helena encourages him and infuses fresh strength into him. And she is certainly affectionate. But they don't allow her to express genuine warmth towards him. At least, I didn't get that feeling. Don't be gussa on me, but, this time, I felt I was watching the owner of a sports team bolstering the confidence of the favourite/star player after a crushing defeat in a match. I feel the CVs don't want the audiences to forget this is a partnership of convenience, obviously in preparation for the explosion of passion that is going to occur between the titular characters and melt everyone's TV screens😆.

Chandra-Helena first night- Loved your take😆. Yes, it was a good and surprising scene in many ways. However, here again, I sensed a slightly malicious motive behind the writing😆.

Look at the scene. It is the bridal chamber...where she is supposed to be Rambha herself, seeking only to please her husband *rolling eyes a hundred times per minute*😆. But what do we see? A calm woman who is fully in control of the situation. Lying sinuously on the bed, she laughs and confidently asks her husband to come closer. Then she proceeds to unveil a battle strategy😆. Now contrast that scene to the traditional, and highly popular, idea of an Indian bride on the wedding night - a shy, afraid and breathless young woman sitting on a flower-strewn bed, shrinking coyly from the advances of her husband😆.

In the show, Chandra displays no sign that he is tempted by her looks, or (unless I'm forgetting any scenes mentioned in your posts) even seeks her company of his own volition when he is downcast. And Helena's behaviour is shown to be cold and bold - two things a woman ought not to be😲😆😆. So yes, while it was a good scene, it appeared to be an attempt to underpin the Truth that she is, after all, a firangi aurat, devoid of shame/shyness, and holds no real attraction for the Indian hero. A woman of the world' as opposed to innocent Indian beauties who merely seek to kill their husbands with spiky armours on the wedding night😆. That said, I do have a soft corner for Nandini for reasons that only have a little to do with the show😆.

Edited by sashashyam - 8 years ago
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
For which, my dear Disha, you owe me a big vote of thanks, for it was I who, having stumbled on her by sheer accident in another forum that I was visiting, coaxed her to join us here.😉

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: .FemmeFatale.

Do I see Ranjana di in the thread? 😲 Di,I have followed your Prithvi fanfic like a bhakt! 😆

disha15 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
Aunty,I had read this post as soon as you posted it and I had even typed a reply to the post,unfortunately now that I checked,it never got posted due to my fluctuating WiFi connection.
With regard to the Chandra-Helena scene,was struck me is the fact that Chandra let his guard down at all. That too to Helena. Now I understand that Chandra is otherwise very strong and bold etc,but he is not arrogant and he is not a male chauvinist. Now in the same scenario,if there was a Malay for instance,he would have thrashed this woman for intruding his privacy and secondly would have been offended by the fact that a woman saw him cry. Mardaangi to men like Malay is all about how powerful a man is over a woman. Male ego would have been a barrier. He would used some other means to let off his steam and show Helena her place 😕

I have mentioned this earlier too,though Chandra repeatedly says that emotions are a distraction,but it unconsciously is his biggest strength.

Edited by .FemmeFatale. - 8 years ago
disha15 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: sashashyam

For which, my dear Disha, you owe me a big vote of thanks, for it was I who, having stumbled on her by sheer accident in another forum that I was visiting, coaxed her to join us here.😉

Shyamala Aunty


Thank you aunty! 😆 Ranju di is an incredible writer and infact when Rajat was pretty much off the screen,kept us entertained for years with her stories which was Rajat's PRC inspired 😆
mishtidoi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
A very interesting debate going on around Helena and Nandini. I'm enjoying it😊
Helena is ambitious, yes, but not heartless...as we have seen wrt her handling of Chandra.
She's proud, yes, but also respects formidable opposition...as we saw her becoming friends with Nandini after their duel.
I don't think, she's still vying for Malayketu, she wants him to teach a lesson for disrespecting her, BUT she truly values what she's got with Chandra, and she has faith in him, and has not trifled with her life...she's too intelligent for being just a woman scorned.

As for Nandini, she's a daughter, yes, BUT SHE'S, NOT, JUST A DAUGHTER, she is also a Princess. I think she's forgotten that or knows nothing about its responsibilities...she's not a Princess in just a war room and not only to win a battle for her father. She's got a Kingdom, the one, about which she blabbers eloquently about but knows nothing about its state or her Praja...her father shelters or misguides her but did not cage her. She's not a toddler, but it seems, she has never put a foot outside her palace gates, never met or interacted with her praja...a la frog in a well syndrome...otherwise she would have known her Pita Maharaja's true colour. It is not that she has not been made aware of her surroundings, even inside palace, her mother tries indirectly, but she chose and chooses to turn a blind eye. Therefore, Chandra was right when he said, "your part of your father's crime and will get punished".

In last night's episode, she did not even made an attempt to listen, like really listen to what Chandra was telling her...her mind was one tracked...he's my Pita maharaja's enemy...that's it.
Also her going after Chandra with her sword was a poor after thought done half halfheartedly...the acting was below standard, I couldn't decipher, if it was sheer anger, frustration or fear.
.
We can see the difference responses to fear, in Chandra's mothers, one who's a simple charwaha's wife, only wants his safety even at her life's price, the other who's a mother and a Queen wants his safety but also her revenge.

We can see the responsibility a status puts in, as Moora, same goes for Nandini. I can't pity her saying, "poor daughter misguided by her father.
Even Prince Siddharth, who was iron shielded from death, despair and misery, had logical questions...certainly not putting Nandini in same league as the person who went on to became "The Enlightened One", that will be hara-kiri, but a normal human brain does have questions and puzzles, does it not?
Edited by mishtidoi - 8 years ago
pakhiv. thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

Aunty supposing this Patalgram and other areas were not under Magadh or any particular kingdom. They could be small village hamlets or principalities skirting Magadhan kingdom and nearby the Former Greek ruled areas in India. This chap, Durdhara's dad could be the Chieftain of these regions. This could also work. Moora was running for day/days together in pregnant avastha. So she could well have crossed the borders of Magadh before she was recaptured by the Magadhan soldiers.

Chandra was irritated by the love soap opera tune of his foster mother so he never visited her. But he kept visiting Durdhara who was his childhood friend occasionally whenever he had vacations at Taxilla gurukul!

kautilya04 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago

@sashashyam - Dear aunty, your comments drag me back even when I try to stay away from this site 😆I'm typing this from a rickshaw, so please forgive any errors.

Aunty, my views on prem, soul mates and marriage - be it in this century or a thousand years ago - are more cynical than that of a woman who has endured ten lifetimes of marital misery😆😆. Believe me, I was joking when I wrote every woman aspires to be a man's soul mate😆. And it was something of a black comedy wala joke 💔😆

I'm sorry my post disappointed you :( but honestly, I hadn't meant for my post to be considered a reply to your analysis. Your mention of Helena induced a bout of mental diarrhea in me😆 and josh mein aake I jotted down whatever I remembered of the thoughts that had passed through my mind while watching those scenes😆. The actual comment related to your analysis will hopefully be posted after I complete my work and am at peace😳. Filhaal, my mind is like an Indian railway station before the departure of several long-distance trains🤪. As for my way of looking at those scenes, I'm helpless. Until early last year, I used to invest some thought into the characters I watched onscreen. But I've lost that ability now. Ab I mostly look at a character through the lens of "What was going on in the script-writer's mind while writing this?" 🤔😆 Yes, it is a very drab and joyless way of watching a show 😆 To snap out of that mode, I have to follow a show for some time, and it helps greatly if the writing is sharp over a sustained period. Then I can forget everything and focus on the characters. Otherwise, all I think is - Could they have written this scene in some other way? Used some better dialogues? Blah blah blah 🥱🥱 Yes, my mind is a tiresome place😆. Perhaps I'll be able to give some rational takes on the characters after I watch some more episodes *fingers crossed*

@Disha - Hey darling, your username is unfamiliar, but your real name does strike a chord :) Thank you for the sweet words 😳🤗

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".