This reminds me of a similar criticism - that time that Rajat's Jalal was stiff in his demeanour - made in the early days of Jodha Akbar in June 2013. It was only when I pointed out, in a post specially requested by young Disha, that the great Dilip Kumar had the same stance in
Mughal-e-Azam, that the carping ceased.
As for this sequence, here is a general, not equipped with a megaphone, having to make himself heard by his soldiers amidst the din of the battlefield. He naturally has to yell at the top of his voice. And they use sync sound. So how could poor Rajat's voice be anything but hoarse?
Still, one could make out every single word, which is not always the case with him, or with Padmanand and several others during the usual indoor scenes.
I am no one's fan, and I am too old to drool over a handsome young man. But I have watched a lot of both Indian and international cinema and TV. Going by my experience with these, Rajat is, to my mind, a very competent, indeed very good actor all the time, and an exceptional one from time to time. In particular, he is a master of nuance.
And after seeing the kind of performances that seem to thrive in Hindi TV, this conviction of mine has only been strengthened. Has anyone found an Amitabh Bachchan or a Dilip Kumar in Hindi TV, perhaps, against whom Rajat is found so wanting? I at least have not seen any. The place is, especially when it comes to male actors, crowded with mediocrities who play supporting roles while the female leads dominate the show. No wonder, then, that anything goes for male TV actors.
Shyamala B.Cowsik
Edited by sashashyam - 8 years ago