Kangana is seriously losing it! - Page 7

Originally posted by: atominis

Like I said, she and Rangoli are bitter, traumatised and foul mouthed.

She has often talked about slapping back her dad and grandpa too.

She thinks she is being honest or blunt but it only makes her look bad.

She never thinks before she shoots her mouth off.

I know her rants or wishing death on others or attacking even young comedians and content creators online is cheap but she seems to be in perpetual victim mode and sees everyone as enemy who needs to be punished or eliminated if they piss her off.

I can understand often bitter experiences in young age make person so damn bitter that he or she simply gets into maaro ya maro mentality and sees everyone else as extension of those who hurt her or him in first place.

Kangana needs therapy. And also needs to be left alone to herself. The more people talk to her or react or chide or question her the worse she becomes.

Rangoli is another nasty piece of work but what Kangana did to Vikrant Massey is completely inexcusable. I mean he was bantering with his friend but trust the vile woman to come out of nowhere and start her crap

I feel Rangoli also became bitter after that acid attack incident which ruined her face.

Both sisters are bitter and see themselves as lone warriors defending each other. And now hide behind nationalism or religion or politics or caste etc to play victim.

She's not suited for politics. 👎🏼

I feel that many members here have written things that correspond to Kangana's behaviour since many years...a behaviour where she degrades herself more & more.

I don't want to add to the psychological "design" painted by some...I rather think that her portrait is a mix or a kind of conglomeration of different or complementary views.

I like the concept of nature - nuture and in Kangana, I see a lot of hate and a destructive mind that seems to get the mastery over her creative and artistic talent. This is also a very self-destructing way and seems to fatally destabilise her mental and emotional health (which may - or may not - originate from her childhood).

If ever she would see a need for therapy, it would (imo) only be when she is at the lowest point of her existence - for now, she still doesn't seem to perceive herself as doing/saying/writing something "wrong".

Originally posted by: Clochette

I feel that many members here have written things that correspond to Kangana's behaviour since many years...a behaviour where she degrades herself more & more.

I don't want to add to the psychological "design" painted by some...I rather think that her portrait is a mix or a kind of conglomeration of different or complementary views.

I like the concept of nature - nuture and in Kangana, I see a lot of hate and a destructive mind that seems to get the mastery over her creative and artistic talent. This is also a very self-destructing way and seems to fatally destabilise her mental and emotional health (which may - or may not - originate from her childhood).

If ever she would see a need for therapy, it would (imo) only be when she is at the lowest point of her existence - for now, she still doesn't seem to perceive herself as doing/saying/writing something "wrong".

Any suggestions as to a solution prior to her getting to her low point? The OUTBURSTS are Artistic and Political in nature.

Honestly, I doubt, that Kangana is a "political" person...policy seems to be just a tool to keep herself relevant...and the current policy fits in with her destructive tendency. The little I saw of her kind of portraying Indira doesn't give me any positive vibes.

Originally posted by: atominis

I feel bad for her for what happened to her in PAST. Not what she does NOW.

She is messed up for life perhaps due to past.

Modi is not pro Sikh. Please read how he harassed and tried to drive out Sikh farmers of Gujarat when he was Gujarat CM.

Swamy is two faced and is used by RAW, RSS, IB to have back channel talks with Sikhs and integrate Sikh separatists from abroad also in mainstream. This is why he pretends to condemn 1984 and even goes to extent of calling Bhindranwale a saint and defends him.

Most of BJP brass does not like him BTW. He is seen as blabbering idiot.

He or Modi do NOT recognise Sikhs as separate religion and keep repeating tripe of Sikhism being offshoot of Hinduism or Guru Gobind Singh creating Khalsa only to protect Hindus and fight Muslims.

The recent praise for Sikhs or condemning 1984 or bashing Indira is only done to counter INC and expose it as bigger sinner against minorities and original murderer of democracy so that INC stops acting holier than thou about minorities or human rights or democracy.

I am shocked at number of young Sikhs who seem to be carried away by drama of Swamy or Modi.

There were BJP leaders from MP, UP who openly said they were missing Indira Gandhi and said she handled it right in 1984 or called farmers Khalistanis.

To claim only IT cell trolls did it and no one else, is untrue.

IT cell, babas, godmen, celebs, TV anchors close to BJP, RSS do everything at bidding of high command. The high command did nothing to stop them either.

Modi even repeated the LIE that farmers attacked Red Fort or desecrated Indian flag though they did NOT desecrate or remove Tiranga at all. And Modi whined in Mann ki baat ki aaj bahut bura hua blah blah. He is a wily man who pretends to be friendly but keeps encouraging a certain narrative too.

Anyone who thinks even mildly that RW is friend of Sikhs, really needs to rethink and relook.

It was this Sanghi/pro RW editor Girilal Jain of TOI who was at forefront of inciting anti Sikh hate in 80s and 90s and even justified Nov 1984 genocide claiming Sikhs deserved it. Rather bashed victims who moved to Punjab for safety, claiming they will get radicalised or become militants or pose a security threat to Hindus of Punjab.

Even when Modi withdrew farm laws he did not say he did it for farmers. He said they were unable to explain benefits to farmers so they are withdrawing these laws for sake of security, integrity, unity and national interest of India. Indirectly hinting as if farmers would have broken the country or its unity if the laws were not withdrawn - lending credence to propaganda linking farmers to terrorism and separatism.

Once again you are pretending that I am ignorant. Or you like putting words in other people's mouths. I wish I could show you my Twitter or any other social media accounts, or any of the newspaper articles I published during that time. I can't because it will reveal my identity. I am not a fan of the BJP. I specifically have stated that Kangana's hatred goes beyond her party loyalty. That does not mean that BJP is in any way good. If you have been following me close enough here I criticize them on this forum as well. In fact, when it comes to choosing between Bollywood and BJP I often point out any political plots BJP might have up their sleeve to gain more control into suppressing Bollywood into their whims.

Again saying someone has condemned Indira is not saying they are pro-Sikh. Again where are you getting this from? This education lesson on how BJP is not pro-Sikh as if I honestly did not know. Swamy is just as hell bent of creating a hindutva raj in India as any other RSS member. The difference between him and Modi is he has always known Sikhs can't be forced to bow down to anyone's wishes. They have to be sweet-talked, manipulated, and won over using other methods. Modi learned that the hard way. My sister and I were among the first in our group of friends circles to tell others that no one else in the world believed what the Indian media was trying to sell happened at red fort. We had a meeting with our Congressmen that said no one in Washing D.C. believed the farmers had been violent at red fort incident. The last source they would have believed was the Indian media. Do you honestly think we would have missed Modi's narrative?

Politicians saying they are missing Indira Gandhi is still not equivalent to them calling a genocide. I am sure they were probably wishing for it. They know they can not get away with that in today's time. It is not 1984 anymore. Once again when did I say it was only the BJP IT cell? Don't you think anyone following the protest like I already have stated I did would have known the Indian media is at it? So much of what you are saying implies I stated something I did not.

Of course, politicians make whatever statements they make regarding Indira or anyone else due to political motives. At times they support her for political motives and at times they condemn her. The difference between Kangana and them is she just spews venom. Whether that makes her better or worse is a different story. But her problematic statements do not occur just due to her loyalty to her party. For an example, Modiji go back to your virat roop from the early 2000s, we need gundey to fight gundey. She meant the Gujrat Riots you really think she got brownie points from Modi for indirectly asserting he was the culprit behind the Gujrat riots? There was huge buzz that it was the Modi government who got her banned.

Even at the end of the protest. She seemed angered about the farmers celebrating their victory. She could not take their happiness. Thus she brought up a traumatic past event that had occurred in the community that was the same community as some of the people protesting. I am sure Modi in his mind was cursing the Sikhs. They were a huge part of the farmer's protest. Although protest entailed almost all faiths and castes.The farmers broke down his tough guy image and made him go back on his word. But at the time he took back the laws because he realized he was going to politically jeopardize himself if he did not repeal them. So I am not sure how Kangana's statement was politically helpful to BJP at the time.

She makes hateful statements if had to make an analogy don't mean to gross anyone else. It is almost like when someone needs to barf. We need to cleanse our stomachs of rotten food. She needs to cleanse her mind of hatred and anger. Thus I said her hateful comments go beyond her party loyalty. That once again did not in any way imply that I am a fan of BJP or I think they were pro-Sikh.

You on the other hand have stated you have no issues with what Kangana does NOW. You might not feel bad for her now but for her past maybe. But not have issues with what she does now is something I disagree with. Whatever it stems from her behavior is problematic.

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

No, the second tweet was successfully reported and deleted. It was def calling for genocide. Locating the cancer of the nation and wanting to eradicate it.

Regarding Bengal? Go back to your virat roop from the early 2000s (Gujrat riots) which was definitely a genocide.

And no Kangana used a picture of this dadi saying she was the same Shaheen Bagh Dadi. This dadi responded to Kangana in punjabi to explain. The Shaheen Bagh dadi does not speak Punjabi. She explained how she was a farmer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1OjwyH4lRw

Here is Kangana's tweet where she commented on the Shaheen Bagh protests dadi who was on Time magazine. The other lady's photo is in the meme only. Kangana deleted this post after the backlash anyways. BBC didn't need to track down the Punjabi lady, unnecessarily make her feel insulted by twisting Kangana's words as if she had taken a direct dig at her, just to invite more Kangana bashing because it suited their agenda as Kangana supported the farm bills.

Similarly, that other tweet was being spread without any context. It's too far-fetched to come to such conclusions IMO. Here are the other tweets from the same time, showing that she was talking regarding the leaked toolkit.

Originally posted by: Sadhanai

Here is Kangana's tweet where she commented on the Shaheen Bagh protests dadi who was on Time magazine. The other lady's photo is in the meme only. Kangana deleted this post after the backlash anyways. BBC didn't need to track down the Punjabi lady, unnecessarily make her feel insulted by twisting Kangana's words as if she had taken a direct dig at her, just to invite more Kangana bashing because it suited their agenda as Kangana supported the farm bills.

First of all it does not take a genius to figure out what the meme implied. It states, "1 Dadi at Shahhed Bagh" then states "2 Dadi Farmers." Then underneath it goes on to say, "Dadi available for hire on per day basis" It is implying that it is the same dadi being hired to protest at both of these events for money. And why did Kangana share a meme that clearly indicated that? Right because she too Is implying something. You are telling me Kangana shared a meme with two completely different women on it by accident? She might be nuts but she is not that stupid. She is clearly implied the same thing. She said, "It is the same dadi. She is available for 100 rupees." As in the same person at both protest is being paid to protest for 100 rupees. It turned out to be two completely different women.

Similarly, that other tweet was being spread without any context. It's too far-fetched to come to such conclusions IMO. Here are the other tweets from the same time, showing that she was talking regarding the leaked toolkit.

First of all the Khalistani implication once again on the meme shared by Kangana is ludicrous.

"The idea that a global network of secessionists and anti-nationals are fuelling the world’s largest protest is nothing short of ludicrous. But instead of addressing the legitimate concerns of protesting farmers, the Indian government seems to be persisting with its two-pronged approach of silencing dissent and attempting to delegitimise the protests with its dubious claim of foreign interference.

Ravi’s arrest encapsulates this two-pronged approach but it is also symptomatic of a larger malaise – the subversion of democratic institutions in order to further political interests. The deep-rooted rot within India’s criminal justice system makes it susceptible to being weaponised by political parties when they control the state. In this context, the eagerness of the police to make out a less-than-credible case against Ravi that helps promote the ruling party’s international conspiracy trope raises serious concerns about the rule of law in India."

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/2/23/greta-thunbergs-toolkit-exposes-indias-failing-institutions

Secondly how is it far-fetched based on what she is implying? We have identified the cancer of the nation. Khalistanis according to her who are funding this protest she would clearly like to end it for political reasons. Now the process of eradication can begin. You tell me what else could she have possibly meant far-fetched my foot. It was crystal clear what she was implying.

Thirdly, the farmers protest is over. Kangana already lost her battle to defame farmers and the protest. The fact that you have to continue to cover up how big of an idiot Kangana revealed herself to be is just a sad state of affairs for fans, PR, and anyone else associated with her. Which further proves the lady is idiotic. She would do herself a huge favor by keeping her mouth shut with scotch tape but she can't. You are saying this woman can not call for a genocide of the farmers she claims are Khalistanis? The implication should not at all be farfetched here.

Responses should be in red !

Bolsanaro lost. There is hope.

Tories next? Can happen.